28.01.2013 Views

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Details of Application<br />

Application Number 2006/203<br />

<strong>Variety</strong> Name ‘Tegege’<br />

Genus Species Cannabis sativa<br />

Common Name Industrial Hemp<br />

Synonym Nil<br />

Accepted Date 15 Aug 2006<br />

Applicant Agri Fibre Industries Pty. Ltd., Bundaberg, QLD<br />

Agent N/A<br />

Qualified Person David Gillespie<br />

Details of Comparative Trial<br />

Location Bargara, QLD<br />

Descriptor Hemp (Cannabis sativa) TG/Hemp (DRAFT).<br />

Period 2008-2009.<br />

Conditions Trial 1 (Autumn 2008): the trial was sown in a well prepared<br />

red ferrisol kraznozem on 28th Feb 2008. Growth conditions<br />

were not conducive for plant measurements as we<br />

subsequently discovered that the area had previously been<br />

band treated with diuron two years before planting, too soon<br />

for a sensitive crop like industrial hemp, and this made the<br />

trial quite variable. Also the autumn time of sowing meant<br />

maturity was earlier and less spread out than the normal<br />

spring planting time. Leaf measures and plant heights were<br />

affected by the short day length and differences were slight<br />

compared to a spring planting. Weeds were removed at a<br />

young age by hand throughout the trial period. Watering was<br />

by trickle irrigation and plants were never stressed for water.<br />

Pest and diseases were controlled as necessary with<br />

insecticides and fungicides before there was any damage.<br />

Trial Design Randomised factorial complete block with 4 replicates with<br />

100 plants per variety per replicate.<br />

Measurements For leaf 30 samples per replicate, for plant height 20 samples.<br />

RHS Chart - edition 2001.<br />

Origin and Breeding<br />

Controlled pollination: the pollination was controlled to the extent that male plants<br />

were removed before anthesis from the maternal parent while several paternal parents<br />

of unknown origin to the applicant pollinated the maternal parent. The source F1<br />

hybrid seed coded ‘Guelph 3-64’ was imported through quarantine under licence from<br />

Mr Peter P. Dragla (now deceased), University of Guelph, Ridge Town College,<br />

Ontario, Canada in Dec, 2003. The breeding line ‘Guelph 3-64’ was from very late<br />

maturing parents under Canadian conditions (matured in 160 days from sowing). The<br />

F1 source seed and subsequent generations were then grown in isolation until final<br />

selection. Open pollination from individual plants selected for low THC content was<br />

carried out in the first three generations from the F1 source seed. Male plants were<br />

screened before anthesis, small males discarded and female plants screened for low<br />

THC content at half seed fill using an in-house colorimetric test. The Government<br />

analyst also monitored populations with a random 30 plant sample. Achenes of<br />

‘Tegege’ were tasted when semi-hard mature at F3 generation and tasted very good.<br />

‘Tegege’s fatty acid profile was determined by SGS Toowoomba, Queensland a<br />

NATA accredited laboratory. Bast fibre strength by breaking stalks was low for<br />

‘Tegege’. Bast fibre content was however high at 31% while ‘Carmen’ measured 30%<br />

bast fibre content and ‘Anka’ 18% bast in previous experiments. Seed yields of<br />

individual plants were recorded with the highest seed yielding plants retained that had<br />

low THC content. Final selections were taken at the F5 generation.<br />

Page 231 of 550<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Varieties <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 21 No.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!