Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RHS Chart - edition Plant Varieties Journal Vol. 21 No.3 vineyard conditions as well as for those grown in the pot trial. Leaf measurements were recorded for vines grown in the pot trial. Leaf lamina length (L1) was recorded from the point at which the petiole attached to the mid-apex of the leaf. Similar measurements were made between the point at which the lamina attached to the apices of the other lobes (L2, L3, R2 and R3). Leaf widths were also recorded between the two proximal (R3 and L3) and the two distal (R2 and L2) lobes. Petiole length was also recorded. These measurements were used to calculate a number of ratios. Origin and Breeding A series of controlled crosses was devised by CSIRO vine breeder Dr. A. J. Antcliff (deceased) to re-combine the characteristics of American Vitis species for selection under Australian conditions. The crosses, which involved many different species combined either through inter- or intra-specific hybridisations, were conducted in 1967 at the University of Illinois by Dr. H. C. Barrett, who was an employee of CSIRO and acted under the direction of Dr. Antcliff. ‘Merbein 5512’ was selected from a cross made between V. berlandieri Ressequier No. 1 (female parent) x V. berlandieri ‘Mazade’ (male parent). The seeds from the crosses were introduced to Australia in 1967 and germinated at CSIRO Plant Industry’s laboratories at Merbein in NW Victoria. Emergent seedlings were rowed out in progeny groups in the experimental vineyard at CSIRO Merbein in 1968 and trained to a single wire trellis. These seedlings have been maintained using standard viticultural practices. The progeny from which ‘Merbein 5512’ was selected was screened for a range of essential and desirable rootstock characteristics under the direction of Dr. Ernst Ruhl and Mr. Peter Clingeleffer, former and current employees of CSIRO Plant Industry, respectively. Based on its nursery and propagation characteristics, which were measured using dormant cuttings taken from the original seedling, coupled with the mineral status of its shoot tissues measured over several seasons, ‘Merbein 5512’ was multiplied via dormant cuttings in 1988. Rootlings, produced from dormant cuttings propagated under mist over bottom heated beds, were grafted with V. vinifera cv. Shiraz scions for further screening as a rootstock in a replicated trial conducted at CSIRO’s Koorlong property in NW Victoria from 1989 until present. Under the supervision of Mr Peter Clingeleffer, vine performance and winemaking data were collected and analysed for this trial from 1995 until 2003. These data, along with additional information concerning its nematode and Phylloxera tolerance collected under the guidance of Dr Steve Sykes (CSIRO Plant Industry) and Dr Kevin Powell (DPI Victoria), respectively, were used to select ‘Merbein 5512’ as a potential new rootstock for the wine industry. ‘Merbein 5512’ was selected because of: its very high rate of propagation by rooting dormant cuttings; its graft compatibility with a major wine grape variety, viz. V. vinifera cv. Shiraz; its tolerance to both the Rutherglen and King Valley strains of Phylloxera; its ability to withstand infestation by three biotypes of root-knot nematode, viz. Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica (a) and M. javanica (b); its ability to regulate potassium uptake into Shiraz berries such that optimum levels were attained for premium winemaking; its ability to impart an appropriate level of vigour in Shiraz scions matched by yield and fruit quality which are reflected in juice and wine quality; its ability to impart good oenological characteristics to Shiraz grapes such that wine quality in terms of colour density, total anthocyanins and total phenolics exceeded those imparted by 1103 Paulsen and Ramsey rootstocks, which are commonly used industry standards. To date, no off-types have been observed following vegetative propagation of ‘Merbein 5512’. Page 472 of 550
Plant Varieties Journal Vol. 21 No.3 Choice of Comparators Characteristics used for grouping varieties to identify the most similar Variety of Common Knowledge Organ/Plant Context Part State of Expression in Group of Varieties Cuttings ease of propagation to yield rootlings very easy Flower sexual organs fully developed stamens and no gynoecium or reflexed stamens and fully developed gynoecium Young shoot openness of tip fully open Young shoot density of prostrate hairs on tip very dense/dense Most Similar Varieties of Common Knowledge identified (VCK) Name Comments ‘41B’ ‘K48-45 Lider’ ‘M61-19’ CSIRO roostock hybrid of same parentage (ie V. cinerea 55 x V. cinerea 194-1). ‘M61-36’ CSIRO selection for which PBR Part 1 has also been submitted. ‘Merbein 5489’ CSIRO selection for which PBR Part 1 has also been submitted. ‘Merbein 6262’ CSIRO selection for which PBR Part 1 has also been submitted. Varieties of Common Knowledge identified and subsequently excluded Variety Distinguishing State of State of Comments Characteristic Expression in Expression in Candidate Comparator Variety Variety ‘125AA Young openness of tip fully open half open excluded from Kober’ shoot comparative table ‘5C fully open half open excluded from Teleki’ comparative table ‘Borner’ Young openness of tip fully open wide open excluded from shoot comparative table ‘Cosmos Young openness of tip fully open half open excluded from 10A’ shoot comparative table ‘Dogridge’ Young openness of tip fully open half open excluded from shoot comparative table ‘Freedom’ Young openness of tip fully open half open excluded from shoot comparative table ‘K48-38 Young openness of tip fully open wide open excluded from Lider’ shoot comparative table ‘K48-48 Young openness of tip fully open half open excluded from Lider’ shoot comparative table Page 473 of 550
Page 1 and 2:
● Plant Breeders Rights ● Home
Page 3 and 4:
Interactive Variety Description Sys
Page 5 and 6:
A payment of $100 is required on lo
Page 7 and 8:
Overseas Testing/Data Use of Overse
Page 9 and 10:
PBR Infringement Grantees should be
Page 11 and 12:
Cumulative Index to Plant Varieties
Page 13 and 14:
Requirement to Supply Comparative V
Page 15 and 16:
European Developments Community pla
Page 17 and 18:
Instructions to Qualified Persons I
Page 19 and 20:
The Queensland office Monday 4 May
Page 21 and 22:
ACCEPTANCE The following varieties
Page 23 and 24:
‘Bonmadpipa’ syn Pink Single Ap
Page 25 and 26:
‘BundyGem’ Application No: 2008
Page 27 and 28:
Erodium chrysanthum CRANESBILL, YEL
Page 29 and 30:
‘Caramel’ Application No: 2008/
Page 31 and 32:
‘MULTIRED 3’ Application No: 20
Page 33 and 34:
‘TPP5’ Application No: 2008/071
Page 35 and 36:
‘PRERASJER’ Application No: 200
Page 37 and 38:
Applicant: The Western Australian A
Page 39 and 40:
Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima)
Page 41 and 42:
Lentil (Lens culinaris) Leucadendro
Page 43 and 44:
Nectarine (Prunus persica var. nuci
Page 45 and 46:
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Wheat (Tr
Page 47 and 48:
Plant Varieties Journal Plant Varie
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 57 of 550 Plant Varieties Jour
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 101 of 550 Plant Varieties Jou
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Details of Application Application
Page 161 and 162:
Ear: length medium medium medium me
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
*Spathe: colour of throat spot purp
Page 167 and 168:
Variety Description and Distinctnes
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Degree of: fading of flower colour
Page 173 and 174:
Varieties of Common Knowledge ident
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Mean 13.00 14.90 15.20 Std. Deviati
Page 179 and 180:
grown. Selection was made for vigou
Page 181 and 182:
LSD/sig 1.97 P≤0.01 P≤0.01 ns S
Page 183 and 184:
Choice of Comparators Characteristi
Page 185 and 186:
Leaf: presence of nectaries present
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Bract: size medium medium Boll: siz
Page 191 and 192:
Most Similar Varieties of Common Kn
Page 193 and 194:
Fibre: length uniformity (%) Mean 8
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Boll: lint proportion (%) Mean 45.5
Page 199 and 200:
RHS Chart - edition 2001 edition. O
Page 201 and 202:
Statistical Table Organ/Plant Part:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Petal: apex rounded pointed rounded
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Standard petal: colour of markings
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
*Adult leaf: size of blade *Mature
Page 223 and 224:
Prior Applications and Sales Countr
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
achis inflorescence peduncle Flower
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
*Leaf: anthocyanin colouration abse
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Plant: height (flowering plant incl
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
*Leaf blade: angle of the tip point
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
*Leaf blade: angle of the tip point
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
*Spike: maximum width medium to bro
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
*Flower: colour of standard blue bl
Page 257 and 258:
Organ/Plant Part: Context ‘Wildfi
Page 259 and 260:
*Male floret mass: colour of distal
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
*Flower: main colour of inner side
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Leaf: thickness (mm) Mean 0.81 0.59
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
length/width ratio Fully developed
Page 279 and 280:
Mature fruit: groove in left should
Page 281 and 282:
DNA/molecular marker: LMMA1/202 DNA
Page 283 and 284:
LSD/Sig. 104.8 P≤0.01 ns Ripe fru
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
and branches Inflorescence: density
Page 289 and 290:
ackground colour Mature fruit/skin:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
*Mature fruit: presence of sinus *M
Page 295 and 296:
DNA/molecular marker: LMMA12/204 DN
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
*Fruit: anthocyanin colouration aro
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
*Corolla: predominant colour medium
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
etween veins (varieties with red lo
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Fruit: thickness of skin medium med
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Fruit ground colour of flesh whitis
Page 331 and 332:
*Fruit: pubescence present present
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Std. Deviation 0.92 0.95 LSD/sig 1.
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Bract: curving absent absent Bract:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Inflorescence: size small medium In
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Flower bud: anthocyanin colouration
Page 359 and 360:
‘Remarka’ Variety Description a
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
weak Leaflet: depth of veins shallo
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
of coalescence Leaflet: waviness of
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Leaf: anthocyanin colouration on mi
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Leaf: openness Leaf: presence of se
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Terminal and lateral leaflets: freq
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
*Plant: frequency of flowers low lo
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
*Plant: frequency of flowers low lo
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
inflorescence colouration brownish
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Inflorescence: tepal blade colour (
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Stem: intensity of basal branching
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Flower: size medium small *Fruit: l
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
section *Flower: type double *Flowe
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422: Flower: profile of upper part *Flow
Page 423 and 424: Most Similar Varieties of Common Kn
Page 425 and 426: Details of Application Application
Page 427 and 428: Flower bud: shape of longitudinal s
Page 431 and 432: Flowering shoot: number of flowers
Page 435 and 436: *Flower: profile of lower part conc
Page 441 and 442: Variety Description and Distinctnes
Page 445 and 446: Petiole: attitude of hairs strongly
Page 449 and 450: *Leaf: blistering medium weak weak
Page 453 and 454: Terminal leaflet: shape of incision
Page 457 and 458: *Fruit: ratio of length/width sligh
Page 459 and 460: Choice of Comparators Characteristi
Page 463 and 464: *Fruit: predominant shape conical a
Page 465 and 466: per variety per block. Measurements
Page 469 and 470: *Mature leaf: anthocyanin colourati
Page 471: Plant Varieties Journal Vol. 21 No.
Page 475 and 476: erect hairs on internodes Shoot: nu
Page 477 and 478: Mean 0.89 0.96 1.15 0.89 0.95 0.95
Page 479 and 480: laid out as a randomised block desi
Page 481 and 482: for fruit production only) *Young s
Page 483 and 484: colouration of main veins on upper
Page 487 and 488: Characteristics Additional to the D
Page 493 and 494: Stripe rust gene Yr18: present/abse
Page 497 and 498: GRANTS Agapanthus africanus AGAPANT
Page 499 and 500: Certificate No: 3571 Expiry Date: 1
Page 501 and 502: Agent: Australian Nurseryman's Frui
Page 503 and 504: ‘EGA Burke’ A Application No: 2
Page 505 and 506: Denomination Changed Common Changed
Page 507 and 508: Change of Agent Plant Varieties Jou
Page 509 and 510: Withdrawn Plant Varieties Journal V
Page 511 and 512: 2002/080 Plectranthus strigosus sac
Page 513 and 514: Corrigenda Cordyline australis ‘J
Page 515 and 516: APPENDIX 1 FEES Two fee structures
Page 517 and 518: APPENDIX 2 Plant Breeders Rights Ad
Page 519 and 520: Anigozanthos Paananen, Ian Kirby, G
Page 521 and 522: Cereals Bullen, Kenneth Collins, Da
Page 523 and 524:
___________________________________
Page 525 and 526:
Lucerne Bannan, Nathaniel Downes, R
Page 527 and 528:
Ornamentals - Indigenous Abell, Pet
Page 529 and 530:
Pistacia Richardson, Clive Sykes, S
Page 531 and 532:
___________________________________
Page 533 and 534:
TABLE 2 Plant Varieties Journal Vol
Page 535 and 536:
Plant Varieties Journal Vol. 21 No.
Page 537 and 538:
Paananen, Ian 02 4381 0051 02 8569
Page 539 and 540:
Appendix 4 Index of Accredited Non-
Page 541 and 542:
APPENDIX 5 ADDRESSES OF UPOV AND ME
Page 543 and 544:
analysed data. These staff will req
Page 545 and 546:
Luff Partnership Kulnura, NSW Ramm
Page 547 and 548:
APPENDIX 7 List of Classes for Vari
Page 549 and 550:
APPENDIX 8 REGISTER OF PLANT VARIET
show all

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?