28.01.2013 Views

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

Plant Variety Journal - IP Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Details of Application<br />

Application Number 2005/276<br />

<strong>Variety</strong> Name ‘NMBP4069’<br />

Genus Species Mangifera indica<br />

Common Name Mango<br />

Synonym Nil<br />

Accepted Date 13 Apr 2006<br />

Applicant State of Queensland through its Department of Primary<br />

Industries and Fisheries, CSIRO, Northern Territory of<br />

<strong>Australia</strong> rep by the Department of Primary Industry,<br />

Fisheries and Mines, State of WA through its Department of<br />

Agriculture and Food.<br />

Agent Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane,<br />

QLD<br />

Qualified Person Ian Bally<br />

Details of Comparative Trial<br />

Location Southedge Research Station, McMallisn Rd, Paddys Green,<br />

PO Box 174, Mareeba, QLD 4880. (Lat 17 °S, Long 145 °E,<br />

Elevation 457 metres).<br />

Descriptor Mango (Mangifera indica) TG/112/4.<br />

Period 2000-2008.<br />

Conditions The field site has soil of the Morganbury sub-type of red<br />

kandosos with deep to very deep brown sandy loam to sandy<br />

clay grading to red apedial sandy clay loam to sandy clay,<br />

moderately acid to neutral (pH 5.8-7.5) and gravely. Scions of<br />

the candidate and comparator varieties were grafted onto<br />

polyembryonic ‘Kensington Pride’ seedling rootstocks and<br />

planted at 4 meters in the row and 7 meters between rows.<br />

Trial Design The comparative trial design was a randomised complete<br />

block design with five single tree replicates of the candidate,<br />

parents and comparator cultivars.<br />

Measurements 10-20 random measurements were made of each character<br />

assessed on each of the five single tree replicates.<br />

RHS Chart - edition fourth edition.<br />

Origin and Breeding<br />

Controlled pollination: The candidate cultivar was generated by closed pollination<br />

using hand pollination techniques (Bally et al. 2000) with ‘Van Dyke’ as the maternal<br />

parent and ‘Kensington Pride’ as the paternal (pollen) parent. Selection of the<br />

candidate from other progeny of this and other families was done at two sites:<br />

Southedge Research Station, Mareeba, QLD and Coastal plains Research Farm,<br />

Darwin, NT. The candidate cultivar was selected after comparative evaluation of tree<br />

and fruit characteristics over several seasons - Bally ISE, Kulkarni VJ, Johnson PR,<br />

Leonardi J, Robinson D, Harris MA, Hamilton D (2000) the <strong>Australia</strong>n National<br />

Mango Breeding Project. Acta Horticulturae 509, 225-231.<br />

Page 284 of 550<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Varieties <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 21 No.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!