Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

More documents

Recommendations

Info

initially be directed towards a particular REDD+ objective. Rather, they should support communities to understand their rights and responsibilities within a broader forest management context and to implement transparent, accountable, and inclusive governance practices. � Investigate lessons learned from collaborative forest management and the potential for scaling. CFM now has nearly a decade of experience, yet the scale of implementation remains small. The Government of Nepal and NGOs should ramp up efforts to cull lessons learned from past experiences in order to discern the scalability of CFM in the Terai. 88 PRRGP INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR REDD: CASE STUDIES – WORKING PAPER
NEPAL CASE STUDY APPENDIX 4.1: LIST OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED DURING THE FIELD VISIT (MAY 13–27, 2011) Type of organization Organization name Contacts interviewed & Title Government REDD Forestry and Climate Krishna Paudel, Chief; Keshav Khanal, Under- Change Cell secretary; and Dil Raj Paudel, FECOFUN representative Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Krishna Acharya, Director General Ministry of Environment, Climate Change Management Division Batu Krishna Uprety, Joint Secretary and Chief Local government District Forest Office, Chitwan Jeeban Thakur, District Forest Officer NGOs International Centre for Laxman Joshi, Payments for Ecosystem Services Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) Specialist and Bhaskar Karky, Resource Economist Forest Action Nepal Dr. Naya Sharma Paudel, Executive Coordinator Federation of Community Forest Users, Nepal (FECOFUN) Dil Raj Khanal, Policy Facilitator Winrock International Bibek Chapagain, Director and Nira Bhatta, Program Associate Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) Pasang Dolma Sherpa, National Coordinator Livelihoods and Forestry Programme (LFP) Peter Branney, Programme Adviser REDD+ project REDD+ Watershed Network Approximately 15 members of the network, plus stakeholders Office, Chitwan forest officer (translator) REDD+ Watershed Network Approximately 15 members of the network, plus Office, Ghorka forest officer (translator), plus local representative of FECOFUN PRRGP INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR REDD: CASE STUDIES – WORKING PAPER 89
Page 1 and 2:
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RESOURCE GOVERN
Page 3:
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RESOURCE GOVERN
Page 6 and 7:
3.0 TANZANIA ......................
Page 8 and 9:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AA Autho
Page 10 and 11:
IUPHHK Timber Resources Utilization
Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE The Institutional Mechanism
Page 14 and 15:
3. Increasing experience in Payment
Page 16 and 17:
BOX 1.1: COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION AND
Page 18 and 19:
� Risk of deforestation; � Prop
Page 20 and 21:
Priority Ecosystems (INEGI classifi
Page 22 and 23:
Overview of key institutions and ac
Page 24 and 25:
It appears that this project is rel
Page 26 and 27:
deliberate, and continuous outreach
Page 28 and 29:
� Additional reforestation: Befor
Page 30 and 31:
elected as assistants to members of
Page 32 and 33:
MEXICO CASE STUDY APPENDIX 1.1: LIS
Page 34 and 35:
Today, the DRC is the most-advanced
Page 36 and 37:
2.2.1 WHAT ARE THE FORMS OF REDD+ B
Page 38 and 39:
to be harmonized with the 2006 Cons
Page 40 and 41:
FIGURE 2.3: TENTATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR
Page 42 and 43:
herbaceous or shrubby savanna that
Page 44 and 45:
comprised of the 18 clan chiefs wit
Page 46 and 47:
NOVACEL staff and supporters is tha
Page 48 and 49:
2.4.2 FUNDING SOURCES As mentioned
Page 50 and 51: These institutions are in essence p
Page 52 and 53: The institutional model for social
Page 54 and 55: In the case of logging concessions,
Page 56 and 57: DRC CASE STUDY APPENDIX 2.1: LIST O
Page 58 and 59: sharing. First, consultations with
Page 60 and 61: emissions). There is also the quest
Page 62 and 63: the village would earn less through
Page 64 and 65: 3.3.2 FUNDING SOURCES Revenues star
Page 66 and 67: village went from earning $50,000 U
Page 68 and 69: hunting quotas set too high by the
Page 70 and 71: Suledo Forest lies in the Kiteto Di
Page 72 and 73: The ZEC aims to acquire rights to m
Page 74 and 75: 3.4.7 EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANC
Page 76 and 77: 3.5 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMME
Page 78 and 79: incentives for populations to engag
Page 80 and 81: � The size and composition of agg
Page 82 and 83: Type of organization Organization n
Page 84 and 85: FIGURE 4.1 MAP OF NEPAL AND LOCATIO
Page 86 and 87: improved tenure security, enhanced
Page 88 and 89: ―distant users‖). Presumably, t
Page 90 and 91: which are housed in the district of
Page 92 and 93: This demonstration project has been
Page 94 and 95: significant backlog of unapproved O
Page 96 and 97: Monitoring and Verification: A moni
Page 98 and 99: management. REDD+ simply provides a
Page 102 and 103: 5.0 INDONESIA 5.1 COUNTRY CONTEXT S
Page 104 and 105: REDD), and the Forest Investment Pr
Page 106 and 107: FIGURE 5.3: THREE IMPLEMENTATION PH
Page 108 and 109: TABLE 5.1: BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION ACC
Page 110 and 111: Land user partnerships: A REDD+ pro
Page 112 and 113: � Learn lessons and build capacit
Page 114 and 115: identifies the owner and boundaries
Page 116 and 117: carried out by Yayasan Puter will f
Page 118 and 119: 5.4.2 FUNDING SOURCES The RUPES pro
Page 120 and 121: Monitoring and verification: HKm gr
Page 122 and 123: provided by Yayasan Puter was not e
Page 124 and 125: emission reductions. However, emerg
Page 126 and 127: REFERENCES Almeida, F. & Hatcher, J
Page 128 and 129: Graf, S. & Iglesias, L. 2010. Pago
Page 130 and 131: REDD+ Forestry and Climate Change C
Page 132: U.S. Agency for International Devel
show all

Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?