Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper
Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper
Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ I<br />
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. IV<br />
PREFACE ............................................................................................................... VIII<br />
1.0 MÉXICO .......................................................................................................... 1<br />
1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1<br />
1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL <strong>REDD+</strong> STRATEGY AND <strong>REDD+</strong> BENEFITS ....................... 3<br />
1.2.1 <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefits ........................................................................................................... 5<br />
1.3 MODELS FOR INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR <strong>REDD+</strong> BENEFITS ............................... 5<br />
1.3.1 Cona<strong>for</strong>’s Proárbol PES .............................................................................................. 5<br />
1.3.2 Carbon PES in Oaxaca ................................................................................................ 9<br />
1.3.3 <strong>REDD+</strong> Pilot Project in the State of Chiapas ..................................................... 12<br />
1.3.4 PES under the State of Chiapas’ Climate Change Strategy ............................. 12<br />
1.4 LESSONS LEARNED, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 13<br />
1.4.1 Lessons Learned and Conclusions ......................................................................... 13<br />
1.4.2 General Recommendations ..................................................................................... 18<br />
MEXICO CASE STUDY APPENDIX 1.1: LIST OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED DURING THE<br />
FIELD VISIT (MARCH 1–12, 2011) ...................................................................................... 20<br />
2.0 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO........................................... 21<br />
2.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 21<br />
2.2 OVERVIEW OF DRC’S NATIONAL <strong>REDD+</strong> STRATEGY AND OPTIONS CONSIDERED FOR<br />
<strong>REDD+</strong> BENEFIT SHARING AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL....................................................... 22<br />
2.2.1 What Are the Forms of <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefits Identified? ....................................... 24<br />
2.2.2 Who Are the <strong>REDD+</strong> Beneficiaries Identified in the National Strategy? .... 25<br />
2.2.3 What <strong>Institutional</strong> System is Considered to Channel <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefits?..... 27<br />
2.3 ILLUSTRATION OF A PROJECT-BASED BENEFIT-SHARING ARRANGEMENT: THE<br />
IBI-BATÉKÉ PROJECT ............................................................................................................. 29<br />
2.3.1 General Description of the Project ....................................................................... 30<br />
2.3.2 Funding Sources .......................................................................................................... 30<br />
2.3.3 Link between Land Rights and Communities’ Access to Benefits ................. 31<br />
2.3.4 Functions Per<strong>for</strong>med in Terms of Benefit Sharing ............................................ 32<br />
2.3.5 Consultation of with Local Communities ............................................................ 33<br />
2.3.6 Grievance and Conflict Resolution <strong>Mechanisms</strong> ................................................ 34<br />
2.3.7 Evaluation of Past Per<strong>for</strong>mance .............................................................................. 34<br />
2.4 BENEFIT-SHARING ARRANGEMENT IN THE FORESTRY SECTOR: THE CASE OF SOCIAL<br />
AGREEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 34<br />
2.4.1 General Description of the Institution ................................................................. 35<br />
2.4.2 Funding Sources .......................................................................................................... 36<br />
2.4.3 Link between Land Rights and Communities’ Access to Benefits ................. 36<br />
2.4.4 Functions Per<strong>for</strong>med in Terms of Benefit Sharing ............................................ 36<br />
2.4.5 Consultation of with Local Communities ............................................................ 37<br />
2.4.6 Grievance and Conflict Resolution <strong>Mechanisms</strong> ................................................ 38<br />
2.4.7 Evaluation of Past Per<strong>for</strong>mance .............................................................................. 38<br />
2.5 LESSONS LEARNED, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 39<br />
2.5.1 Lessons Learned from Ibi-Batéké and Social Agreements in the Forestry<br />
Sector: Challenges and Opportunities <strong>for</strong> <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefit-Sharing ............ 39<br />
2.5.2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 42<br />
DRC CASE STUDY APPENDIX 2.1: LIST OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED DURING THE FIELD<br />
VISIT (MARCH-MAY 2011) .................................................................................................. 44<br />
PRRGP INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR REDD: CASE STUDIES – WORKING PAPER i