11.02.2013 Views

Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ I<br />

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. IV<br />

PREFACE ............................................................................................................... VIII<br />

1.0 MÉXICO .......................................................................................................... 1<br />

1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1<br />

1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL <strong>REDD+</strong> STRATEGY AND <strong>REDD+</strong> BENEFITS ....................... 3<br />

1.2.1 <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefits ........................................................................................................... 5<br />

1.3 MODELS FOR INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR <strong>REDD+</strong> BENEFITS ............................... 5<br />

1.3.1 Cona<strong>for</strong>’s Proárbol PES .............................................................................................. 5<br />

1.3.2 Carbon PES in Oaxaca ................................................................................................ 9<br />

1.3.3 <strong>REDD+</strong> Pilot Project in the State of Chiapas ..................................................... 12<br />

1.3.4 PES under the State of Chiapas’ Climate Change Strategy ............................. 12<br />

1.4 LESSONS LEARNED, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 13<br />

1.4.1 Lessons Learned and Conclusions ......................................................................... 13<br />

1.4.2 General Recommendations ..................................................................................... 18<br />

MEXICO CASE STUDY APPENDIX 1.1: LIST OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED DURING THE<br />

FIELD VISIT (MARCH 1–12, 2011) ...................................................................................... 20<br />

2.0 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO........................................... 21<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 21<br />

2.2 OVERVIEW OF DRC’S NATIONAL <strong>REDD+</strong> STRATEGY AND OPTIONS CONSIDERED FOR<br />

<strong>REDD+</strong> BENEFIT SHARING AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL....................................................... 22<br />

2.2.1 What Are the Forms of <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefits Identified? ....................................... 24<br />

2.2.2 Who Are the <strong>REDD+</strong> Beneficiaries Identified in the National Strategy? .... 25<br />

2.2.3 What <strong>Institutional</strong> System is Considered to Channel <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefits?..... 27<br />

2.3 ILLUSTRATION OF A PROJECT-BASED BENEFIT-SHARING ARRANGEMENT: THE<br />

IBI-BATÉKÉ PROJECT ............................................................................................................. 29<br />

2.3.1 General Description of the Project ....................................................................... 30<br />

2.3.2 Funding Sources .......................................................................................................... 30<br />

2.3.3 Link between Land Rights and Communities’ Access to Benefits ................. 31<br />

2.3.4 Functions Per<strong>for</strong>med in Terms of Benefit Sharing ............................................ 32<br />

2.3.5 Consultation of with Local Communities ............................................................ 33<br />

2.3.6 Grievance and Conflict Resolution <strong>Mechanisms</strong> ................................................ 34<br />

2.3.7 Evaluation of Past Per<strong>for</strong>mance .............................................................................. 34<br />

2.4 BENEFIT-SHARING ARRANGEMENT IN THE FORESTRY SECTOR: THE CASE OF SOCIAL<br />

AGREEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 34<br />

2.4.1 General Description of the Institution ................................................................. 35<br />

2.4.2 Funding Sources .......................................................................................................... 36<br />

2.4.3 Link between Land Rights and Communities’ Access to Benefits ................. 36<br />

2.4.4 Functions Per<strong>for</strong>med in Terms of Benefit Sharing ............................................ 36<br />

2.4.5 Consultation of with Local Communities ............................................................ 37<br />

2.4.6 Grievance and Conflict Resolution <strong>Mechanisms</strong> ................................................ 38<br />

2.4.7 Evaluation of Past Per<strong>for</strong>mance .............................................................................. 38<br />

2.5 LESSONS LEARNED, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 39<br />

2.5.1 Lessons Learned from Ibi-Batéké and Social Agreements in the Forestry<br />

Sector: Challenges and Opportunities <strong>for</strong> <strong>REDD+</strong> Benefit-Sharing ............ 39<br />

2.5.2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 42<br />

DRC CASE STUDY APPENDIX 2.1: LIST OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED DURING THE FIELD<br />

VISIT (MARCH-MAY 2011) .................................................................................................. 44<br />

PRRGP INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR REDD: CASE STUDIES – WORKING PAPER i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!