- Page 1: PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RESOURCE GOVERN
- Page 6 and 7: 3.0 TANZANIA ......................
- Page 8 and 9: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AA Autho
- Page 10 and 11: IUPHHK Timber Resources Utilization
- Page 12 and 13: PREFACE The Institutional Mechanism
- Page 14 and 15: 3. Increasing experience in Payment
- Page 16 and 17: BOX 1.1: COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION AND
- Page 18 and 19: � Risk of deforestation; � Prop
- Page 20 and 21: Priority Ecosystems (INEGI classifi
- Page 22 and 23: Overview of key institutions and ac
- Page 24 and 25: It appears that this project is rel
- Page 26 and 27: deliberate, and continuous outreach
- Page 28 and 29: � Additional reforestation: Befor
- Page 30 and 31: elected as assistants to members of
- Page 32 and 33: MEXICO CASE STUDY APPENDIX 1.1: LIS
- Page 34 and 35: Today, the DRC is the most-advanced
- Page 36 and 37: 2.2.1 WHAT ARE THE FORMS OF REDD+ B
- Page 38 and 39: to be harmonized with the 2006 Cons
- Page 40 and 41: FIGURE 2.3: TENTATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR
- Page 42 and 43: herbaceous or shrubby savanna that
- Page 44 and 45: comprised of the 18 clan chiefs wit
- Page 46 and 47: NOVACEL staff and supporters is tha
- Page 48 and 49: 2.4.2 FUNDING SOURCES As mentioned
- Page 50 and 51: These institutions are in essence p
- Page 52 and 53:
The institutional model for social
- Page 54 and 55:
In the case of logging concessions,
- Page 56 and 57:
DRC CASE STUDY APPENDIX 2.1: LIST O
- Page 58 and 59:
sharing. First, consultations with
- Page 60 and 61:
emissions). There is also the quest
- Page 62 and 63:
the village would earn less through
- Page 64 and 65:
3.3.2 FUNDING SOURCES Revenues star
- Page 66 and 67:
village went from earning $50,000 U
- Page 68 and 69:
hunting quotas set too high by the
- Page 70 and 71:
Suledo Forest lies in the Kiteto Di
- Page 72 and 73:
The ZEC aims to acquire rights to m
- Page 74 and 75:
3.4.7 EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANC
- Page 76 and 77:
3.5 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMME
- Page 78 and 79:
incentives for populations to engag
- Page 80 and 81:
� The size and composition of agg
- Page 82 and 83:
Type of organization Organization n
- Page 84 and 85:
FIGURE 4.1 MAP OF NEPAL AND LOCATIO
- Page 86 and 87:
improved tenure security, enhanced
- Page 88 and 89:
―distant users‖). Presumably, t
- Page 90 and 91:
which are housed in the district of
- Page 92 and 93:
This demonstration project has been
- Page 94 and 95:
significant backlog of unapproved O
- Page 96 and 97:
Monitoring and Verification: A moni
- Page 98 and 99:
management. REDD+ simply provides a
- Page 100 and 101:
initially be directed towards a par
- Page 102 and 103:
5.0 INDONESIA 5.1 COUNTRY CONTEXT S
- Page 104 and 105:
REDD), and the Forest Investment Pr
- Page 106 and 107:
FIGURE 5.3: THREE IMPLEMENTATION PH
- Page 108 and 109:
TABLE 5.1: BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION ACC
- Page 110 and 111:
Land user partnerships: A REDD+ pro
- Page 112 and 113:
� Learn lessons and build capacit
- Page 114 and 115:
identifies the owner and boundaries
- Page 116 and 117:
carried out by Yayasan Puter will f
- Page 118 and 119:
5.4.2 FUNDING SOURCES The RUPES pro
- Page 120 and 121:
Monitoring and verification: HKm gr
- Page 122 and 123:
provided by Yayasan Puter was not e
- Page 124 and 125:
emission reductions. However, emerg
- Page 126 and 127:
REFERENCES Almeida, F. & Hatcher, J
- Page 128 and 129:
Graf, S. & Iglesias, L. 2010. Pago
- Page 130 and 131:
REDD+ Forestry and Climate Change C
- Page 132:
U.S. Agency for International Devel