Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

More documents

Recommendations

Info

emission reductions. However, emerging experiences from REDD+ pilot projects in Indonesia suggest that the profit motivation of private project developers may not necessarily be aligned with the interests of local communities. The unwillingness of PT-RMU to invest financial resources into a full-fledged FPIC process until after the ERC is secured provides an example of this dilemma. This challenge highlights an urgent need for policies, measures, and standards at the national level that regulate private project developers, define a spectrum of acceptable benefit sharing practices, and clarify and legally recognize communities‘ rights in the context of REDD+. Social and environmental safeguards should be developed, monitored, and enforced. In addition, the Government of Indonesia should consider national scale interventions that strengthen the capacity of local communities to participate in REDD+ projects, rather than relying on NGOs or private project developers to deliver these services at scale. 112 PRRGP INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR REDD: CASE STUDIES – WORKING PAPER
INDONESIA CASE STUDY APPENDIX 5.1 – LIST OF INTERVIEWS Type of organization Organization name Contacts interviewed & Title Government Ministry of Forestry Dr. Ir. Hadi S. Pasaribu Dr. Yetti Rusli, Senior Advisor to the Minister of Forestry on Environment and Climate Change Donors USAID Jakarta Alfred Nakatsuma, Aurelia Micko, Carey Yeager, Tony Djogo, Ben Stoner, Bill Rush Ford Foundation Dr. Steve Rhee CLUA Chip Fay AusAid Jakarta Timothy Jessup, Forest and Climate Specialist World Bank Jakarta Tim Brown, Mubariq Ahmad, Emile Jurgens, Olivia Tanujaya Local government Mantaya Sabrang Village Samsudin Molano , Head of Village, Mantaya Sabrang Sumberjaya Sub-District Cucu Suryadi, District forest ranger NGOs Indonesian Center for Environmental Law Giorgio Budi Indrarto CIFOR William Sunderlin, Andrew Wardell Clinton Climate Initiative Taufiq Alimi, National Coordinator Association for Community and Ecologically-Based Law Reform (HuMa) Steni Bernadinus The Nature Conservancy Erin Madeira, Senior Advisor, Forest Carbon Climate Change Team Sekala Ketut Deddy, Director Kemitraan Partnership Avi Mahaningtyas, Chief of Economic and Environmental Cluster HKM Forum Eddy Perwanto, HKM Forum Coordinator = Yayasan Puter Andaman, Katingan Project Facilitator Private sector McKinsey & Company Dr. Gotz Martin Project developers Starling Resources John Claussen, Managing Partner; Rezal Kusumaatmadja, Managing Partner World Agroforestry Center Beria Leimona, RUPES Project Coordinator; Ujjwal (ICRAF) Pradhan; Chandra Wijaya, RUPES Project Coordinator Project Mantaya Sabrang Village Syamsu Usman, Village elder stakeholders Murnia, Head of FPIC group Saifull Anwar, Village Facilitator (hired by Puter Yayasan) Buluh Kapur Community Darsono, Head of Buluh Kapur HKM Group PLTA Way Besai (hydropower company) Subono, CSR Director PRRGP INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR REDD: CASE STUDIES – WORKING PAPER 113
Page 1 and 2:
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RESOURCE GOVERN
Page 3:
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RESOURCE GOVERN
Page 6 and 7:
3.0 TANZANIA ......................
Page 8 and 9:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AA Autho
Page 10 and 11:
IUPHHK Timber Resources Utilization
Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE The Institutional Mechanism
Page 14 and 15:
3. Increasing experience in Payment
Page 16 and 17:
BOX 1.1: COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION AND
Page 18 and 19:
� Risk of deforestation; � Prop
Page 20 and 21:
Priority Ecosystems (INEGI classifi
Page 22 and 23:
Overview of key institutions and ac
Page 24 and 25:
It appears that this project is rel
Page 26 and 27:
deliberate, and continuous outreach
Page 28 and 29:
� Additional reforestation: Befor
Page 30 and 31:
elected as assistants to members of
Page 32 and 33:
MEXICO CASE STUDY APPENDIX 1.1: LIS
Page 34 and 35:
Today, the DRC is the most-advanced
Page 36 and 37:
2.2.1 WHAT ARE THE FORMS OF REDD+ B
Page 38 and 39:
to be harmonized with the 2006 Cons
Page 40 and 41:
FIGURE 2.3: TENTATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR
Page 42 and 43:
herbaceous or shrubby savanna that
Page 44 and 45:
comprised of the 18 clan chiefs wit
Page 46 and 47:
NOVACEL staff and supporters is tha
Page 48 and 49:
2.4.2 FUNDING SOURCES As mentioned
Page 50 and 51:
These institutions are in essence p
Page 52 and 53:
The institutional model for social
Page 54 and 55:
In the case of logging concessions,
Page 56 and 57:
DRC CASE STUDY APPENDIX 2.1: LIST O
Page 58 and 59:
sharing. First, consultations with
Page 60 and 61:
emissions). There is also the quest
Page 62 and 63:
the village would earn less through
Page 64 and 65:
3.3.2 FUNDING SOURCES Revenues star
Page 66 and 67:
village went from earning $50,000 U
Page 68 and 69:
hunting quotas set too high by the
Page 70 and 71:
Suledo Forest lies in the Kiteto Di
Page 72 and 73:
The ZEC aims to acquire rights to m
Page 74 and 75: 3.4.7 EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANC
Page 76 and 77: 3.5 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMME
Page 78 and 79: incentives for populations to engag
Page 80 and 81: � The size and composition of agg
Page 82 and 83: Type of organization Organization n
Page 84 and 85: FIGURE 4.1 MAP OF NEPAL AND LOCATIO
Page 86 and 87: improved tenure security, enhanced
Page 88 and 89: ―distant users‖). Presumably, t
Page 90 and 91: which are housed in the district of
Page 92 and 93: This demonstration project has been
Page 94 and 95: significant backlog of unapproved O
Page 96 and 97: Monitoring and Verification: A moni
Page 98 and 99: management. REDD+ simply provides a
Page 100 and 101: initially be directed towards a par
Page 102 and 103: 5.0 INDONESIA 5.1 COUNTRY CONTEXT S
Page 104 and 105: REDD), and the Forest Investment Pr
Page 106 and 107: FIGURE 5.3: THREE IMPLEMENTATION PH
Page 108 and 109: TABLE 5.1: BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION ACC
Page 110 and 111: Land user partnerships: A REDD+ pro
Page 112 and 113: � Learn lessons and build capacit
Page 114 and 115: identifies the owner and boundaries
Page 116 and 117: carried out by Yayasan Puter will f
Page 118 and 119: 5.4.2 FUNDING SOURCES The RUPES pro
Page 120 and 121: Monitoring and verification: HKm gr
Page 122 and 123: provided by Yayasan Puter was not e
Page 126 and 127: REFERENCES Almeida, F. & Hatcher, J
Page 128 and 129: Graf, S. & Iglesias, L. 2010. Pago
Page 130 and 131: REDD+ Forestry and Climate Change C
Page 132: U.S. Agency for International Devel
show all

Institutional Mechanisms for REDD+ - Case Studies Working Paper

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?