12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abrasive Blasting and Heavy-Metal Contamination 95<br />

• The combination of sodium silicate and silica fume provided higher compressive<br />

strength and lower permeability than separate use of these compounds.<br />

• The set time is proportional to the lead/portland cement ratio; decreasing<br />

the ratio decreases the set time. The compressive strength of the mortar,<br />

on the other hand, is inversely proportional to this ratio.<br />

• For the most highly contaminated mixtures, accelerators were required to<br />

achieve setting.<br />

• All the mortars studied had TCLP leaching concentrations below EPA<br />

limits. No correlation between the types and amounts of metals in the<br />

wastes and the TCLP leaching results was found.<br />

• The proper accelerator and amounts of accelerator necessary should be<br />

determined for each batch of blasting debris (where the batch would be<br />

all the debris from a repainting project, which could be thousands of tons<br />

in the case of a large structure) <strong>by</strong> experimenting with small samples of<br />

debris, accelerators, and portland cement.<br />

Webster and colleagues [30] have investigated the long-term stabilization of<br />

toxic metals in portland cement <strong>by</strong> using sequential acid extraction. They mixed<br />

portland cement with blasting debris contaminated with lead, cadmium, and<br />

chromium. The solid mortar was then ground up and subjected to the TCLP<br />

leaching test. The solid left after filtering was then mixed with fresh acetic acid<br />

and the TCLP test was repeated. This process was done sequentially until the pH<br />

of the liquid after leaching and filtering was below 4. Their findings are summarized<br />

here:<br />

• The amount of lead leaching was strongly dependent on the pH of the<br />

liquid after being mixed with the solid; lead with a pH below 8 began to<br />

leach, and the amount of lead leaching rose dramatically with each sequential<br />

drop in pH.<br />

• Cadmium also began leaching when the pH of the liquid after being<br />

mixed with the solid dropped below 8; the amount leaching reached<br />

a maximum of 6 and then fell off as the pH continued to drop. This<br />

could be an artificial maximum, however, because the amount of<br />

cadmium was low to begin with; it could be that <strong>by</strong> the time the pH<br />

had dropped to 5, almost all the cadmium in the sample had leached<br />

out.<br />

• The authors suggest that the ability of the calcium matrix to resist breakdown<br />

(due to acidification) in the concrete is important for the stabilization<br />

of lead and cadmium.<br />

• Chromium began leaching with the first extractions (pH 12); the amount<br />

leached was constant with each of the sequential extractions until the pH<br />

dropped below 6. Because the amount of chromium in the debris was also<br />

low, the authors suggest that chromium has no pH dependency for leaching;<br />

instead it merely leaches until it is gone. This finding was supported<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!