12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

134 Corrosion Control Through Organic Coatings<br />

8.2 EVALUATION AFTER ACCELERATED AGING<br />

After the accelerated aging, samples should be evaluated for changes. By comparing<br />

samples before and after aging, one can find:<br />

• Direct evidence of corrosion<br />

• Signs of coating degradation<br />

• Implicit signs of corrosion or failure<br />

The coatings scientist uses a combination of techniques for detecting macroscopic<br />

and submicroscopic changes in the coating-substrate system. The quantitative and<br />

qualitative data this provides must then be interpreted so that a prediction can be<br />

made as to whether the coating will fail, and if possible, why.<br />

Macroscopic changes can be divided into two types:<br />

1. Changes that can be seen <strong>by</strong> the unaided eye or with optical (light)<br />

microscopes, such as rust-through and creep from scribe<br />

2. Large-scale changes that are found <strong>by</strong> measuring mechanical properties,<br />

of which the most important are adhesion to the substrate and the ability<br />

to prevent water transport<br />

Changes in both the adhesion values obtained in before-and-after testing and in the<br />

failure loci can reveal quite a bit about aging and failure mechanisms. Changes in<br />

barrier properties, measured <strong>by</strong> electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), are<br />

important because the ability to hinder transport of electrolyte in solution is one of<br />

the more important corrosion-protection mechanisms of the coating.<br />

One may be tempted to include such parameters as loss of gloss or color change<br />

as macroscopic changes. However, although these are reliable indicators of UV<br />

damage, they are not necessarily indicative of any weakening of the corrosionprotection<br />

ability of the coating system as a whole, because only the appearance of<br />

the topcoat is examined.<br />

Submicroscopic changes cannot be seen with the naked eye or a normal laboratory<br />

light microscope but must instead be measured with advanced electrochemical<br />

or spectroscopic techniques. Examples include changes in chemical structure of the<br />

paint surface that can be found using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)<br />

or changes in the morphology of the paint surface that can be found using atomic<br />

force microscopy (AFM). These changes can yield information about the coating-metal<br />

system, which is then used to predict failure, even if no macroscopic changes have<br />

yet taken place.<br />

More sophisticated studies of the effects of aging factors on the coating include:<br />

• Electrochemical monitoring techniques: AC impedance (EIS), Kelvin probe<br />

• Changes in chemical structure of the paint surface using FTIR or x-ray<br />

photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)<br />

• Morphology of the paint surface using scanning electron microscopy<br />

(SEM) or AFM<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!