© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Weathering and Aging of Paint 109<br />
exchanged, reducing the resistance and thus aging the coating. Coatings vary in their<br />
ability to resist this, but all exhibit the trend to some extent.<br />
Chemical species, such as road salts and atmospheric contaminants in the wind<br />
or rain, are routinely deposited on paint surfaces. There, they combine with condensation<br />
to form aggressive, usually saline or acidic solutions. Most polymers used in<br />
modern coatings have good resistance to acids and salts; however, modern coatings<br />
also contain a large number of additives (see Chapter 2), which can prove vulnerable<br />
to chemical attack. For example, many coatings contain light stabilizers based on<br />
hindered amines to aid UV resistance. It is well known that the performance of these<br />
stabilizers is diminished <strong>by</strong> acids and pesticides [35]. When this occurs, chemical<br />
exposure makes the coating vulnerable to UV breakdown.<br />
The number of studies in this area is limited, but a few have shown exposure of<br />
coatings to atmospheric contaminants to be detrimental. Sampers [35] reports that, in<br />
a study of polyolefin samples exposed both in Florida and on the Mediterranean coast<br />
of France, a dramatic difference was seen in polymer lifetime. Samples exposed on<br />
the Mediterranean had only half the life of those in Florida. The two stations had<br />
broadly similar weathering parameters; the differences should have led to longer<br />
lifetimes in France. Sampers concluded that constituents in the rain or wind had<br />
chemically interacted with the hindered amine light stabilizers in the polymers exposed<br />
in France, causing these samples to be especially vulnerable to UV degradation.<br />
In a study of gloss retention of coatings exposed for 2 1/2 years at weathering<br />
sites in Kuwait, Carew and colleagues [36] reported a probable link between industrial<br />
pollution and coating damage, although in this case the damage seems to have<br />
been caused <strong>by</strong> dust from a cement factory. The sites in this study are described in<br />
Table 6.2. Because all the sites are located in the Shuaiba area of Kuwait’s industrial<br />
belt, they should be very similar in temperature and humidity. The difference between<br />
sites is the distance from the Arabian Gulf and the amount and type of atmospheric<br />
pollution. Carew and colleagues found that coatings consistently showed the worst<br />
performance at site C, although this site is farther from the sea than sites A and B<br />
TABLE 6.2<br />
Description of Sites in Kuwait Study<br />
Site<br />
Distance<br />
from Sea Pollution Notes<br />
A 0.2 km Heavy Downwind from refinery and salt and chlorine<br />
plant<br />
B 0.55 km Heavy Next to refinery and desalination and electricity<br />
production plant<br />
C 1.5 km Heavy Upwind from refinery, next to cement clinker<br />
factory<br />
D 3 km Mild Rural area<br />
Data from: Carew, J.A. et al., Weathering performance of industrial atmospheric coatings<br />
systems in the Arabian Gulf, Proc. Corros. ’94, NACE, Houston, 1994, Paper 445.<br />
<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>