12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Corrosion Testing — Practice 135<br />

8.2.1 GENERAL CORROSION<br />

Direct evidence of corrosion can be obtained <strong>by</strong> macroscopic measurement of creep<br />

from scribe, rust intensity, blistering, cracking, and flaking.<br />

8.2.1.1 Creep from Scribe<br />

If a coating is properly applied to a well-prepared surface and allowed to cure, then<br />

general corrosion across the intact paint surface is not usually a major concern.<br />

However, once the coating is scratched and metal is exposed, the situation is dramatically<br />

different. The metal in the center of the scratch has the best access to<br />

oxygen and becomes cathodic. Anodes arise at the sides of the scratch, where paint,<br />

metal, and electrolyte meet [9]. Corrosion begins here and can spread outward from<br />

the scratch under the coating. The coating’s ability to resist this spread of corrosion<br />

is a major concern.<br />

Corrosion that begins in a scratch and spreads under the paint is called creep or<br />

undercutting. Creep is surprisingly difficult to quantify, because it is seldom uniform.<br />

Several methods are acceptable for measuring it, for example:<br />

• Maximum one-way creep (probably the most common method), which is<br />

used in several standards, such as ASTM S1654<br />

• Summation of creep at ten evenly spaced sites along the scribe<br />

• Average two-way creep<br />

None of these methods is satisfactory for describing filiform corrosion. The maximum<br />

one-way creep and the average two-way creep methods allow measurement<br />

of two values: general creep and filiform creep.<br />

8.2.1.2 Other General Corrosion<br />

Blistering, rust intensity, cracking, and flaking are judged in accordance with the<br />

standard ISO 4628 or the comparable standard ASTM D610. In these methods, the<br />

samples to be evaluated are compared to a set of standard photographs showing<br />

various degrees of each type of failure.<br />

For face blistering, the pictures in the ISO standard represent blister densities<br />

from 2 to 5, with 5 being the highest density. Blister size is also numbered from<br />

2 to 5, with 5 indicating the largest blister. Results are reported as blister density<br />

followed in parentheses <strong>by</strong> blister size (e.g., 4(S2) means blister density = 4 and<br />

blister size = 2); this is a way to quantify the result, “many small blisters.”<br />

For degree of rusting, the response of interest is rust under the paint, or rust<br />

bleed-through. Areas of the paint that are merely discolored on the surface <strong>by</strong> rusty<br />

runoff are not counted if the paint underneath is intact. The scale used <strong>by</strong> ISO 4628<br />

in assigning degrees of rusting is shown in Table 8.1 [10].<br />

Although the ASTM and ISO standards are comparable in methodology, their<br />

grading scales run in opposite directions. In measuring rust intensity or blistering,<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!