© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Corrosion Testing — Practice 135<br />
8.2.1 GENERAL CORROSION<br />
Direct evidence of corrosion can be obtained <strong>by</strong> macroscopic measurement of creep<br />
from scribe, rust intensity, blistering, cracking, and flaking.<br />
8.2.1.1 Creep from Scribe<br />
If a coating is properly applied to a well-prepared surface and allowed to cure, then<br />
general corrosion across the intact paint surface is not usually a major concern.<br />
However, once the coating is scratched and metal is exposed, the situation is dramatically<br />
different. The metal in the center of the scratch has the best access to<br />
oxygen and becomes cathodic. Anodes arise at the sides of the scratch, where paint,<br />
metal, and electrolyte meet [9]. Corrosion begins here and can spread outward from<br />
the scratch under the coating. The coating’s ability to resist this spread of corrosion<br />
is a major concern.<br />
Corrosion that begins in a scratch and spreads under the paint is called creep or<br />
undercutting. Creep is surprisingly difficult to quantify, because it is seldom uniform.<br />
Several methods are acceptable for measuring it, for example:<br />
• Maximum one-way creep (probably the most common method), which is<br />
used in several standards, such as ASTM S1654<br />
• Summation of creep at ten evenly spaced sites along the scribe<br />
• Average two-way creep<br />
None of these methods is satisfactory for describing filiform corrosion. The maximum<br />
one-way creep and the average two-way creep methods allow measurement<br />
of two values: general creep and filiform creep.<br />
8.2.1.2 Other General Corrosion<br />
Blistering, rust intensity, cracking, and flaking are judged in accordance with the<br />
standard ISO 4628 or the comparable standard ASTM D610. In these methods, the<br />
samples to be evaluated are compared to a set of standard photographs showing<br />
various degrees of each type of failure.<br />
For face blistering, the pictures in the ISO standard represent blister densities<br />
from 2 to 5, with 5 being the highest density. Blister size is also numbered from<br />
2 to 5, with 5 indicating the largest blister. Results are reported as blister density<br />
followed in parentheses <strong>by</strong> blister size (e.g., 4(S2) means blister density = 4 and<br />
blister size = 2); this is a way to quantify the result, “many small blisters.”<br />
For degree of rusting, the response of interest is rust under the paint, or rust<br />
bleed-through. Areas of the paint that are merely discolored on the surface <strong>by</strong> rusty<br />
runoff are not counted if the paint underneath is intact. The scale used <strong>by</strong> ISO 4628<br />
in assigning degrees of rusting is shown in Table 8.1 [10].<br />
Although the ASTM and ISO standards are comparable in methodology, their<br />
grading scales run in opposite directions. In measuring rust intensity or blistering,<br />
<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>