12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 Corrosion Control Through Organic Coatings<br />

most automotive tests, including the cyclic corrosion tests, have been developed<br />

using coatings relevant to automotive application. These are designed to act quite<br />

different from protective coatings. Automotive-derived test methods commonly overlook<br />

factors critical to protective coatings, such as weathering and UV factors. In<br />

addition, automotive coatings have much lower dry film thickness than do many<br />

protective coatings; this is important for mass-transport phenomena.<br />

This section is not intended as an overview of automotive industry tests. Some<br />

tests that have good correlation to actual field service for cars and trucks, such as<br />

the Ford APGE, Nissan CCT-IV, and GM 9540P [4], are not described here. The<br />

three tests described here are those believed to be adaptable to heavy maintenance<br />

coatings VDA 621-415, the Volvo Indoor Corrosion Test (VICT), and the Society<br />

of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J2334.<br />

8.1.4.1 VDA 621-415<br />

For many years, the automotive industry in Germany has used an accelerated test<br />

method for organic coatings called the VDA 621-415 [5]; this test has begun to be<br />

used as a test for heavy infrastructure paints also. The test consists of 6 to 12 cycles<br />

of neutral salt spray (as per DIN 50021) and 4 cycles in an alternating condensation<br />

water climate (as per DIN 50017). The time-of-wetness of the test is very high, which<br />

implies poor correlation to actual service for zinc pigments or galvanized steel. It is<br />

expected that zinc will undergo a completely different corrosion mechanism in the<br />

nearly constant wetness of the test than the mechanism that takes place in actual field<br />

service. The ability of the test to predict the actual performance of zinc-coated substrates<br />

and zinc-containing paints must be carefully examined because these materials<br />

are commonly used in the corrosion engineering field. Also, the start of the test (24<br />

hours of 40°C salt spray) has been criticized as unrealistically harsh for latex coatings.<br />

8.1.4.2 Volvo Indoor Corrosion Test or Volvo-cycle<br />

The VICT [6] was developed — despite its name — to simulate the outdoor<br />

corrosion environment of a typical automobile. Unlike many accelerated corrosion<br />

tests, in which the test procedure is developed empirically, the VICT test is the result<br />

of a statistical factorial design [7, 8].<br />

In modern automotive painting, all of the corrosion protection is provided <strong>by</strong><br />

the inorganic layers and the thin (circa 25 µm) electrocoat paint layer. Protection<br />

against UV light and mechanical damage is provided <strong>by</strong> the subsequent paint layers<br />

(of which there are usually three). Testing of the anticorrosion or electrocoat paint<br />

layer can be restricted to a few parameters, such as corrosion-initiating ions (usually<br />

chlorides), time-of-wetness, and temperature. The Volvo test accordingly uses no<br />

UV exposure or mechanical stresses; the stresses used are temperature, humidity,<br />

and salt solution (sprayed or dipped).<br />

The automotive industry has a huge amount of data for corrosion in various<br />

service environments. The VICT has a promising correlation to field data; one<br />

criticism that is sometimes brought against this test is that it may tend to produce<br />

filiform corrosion at a scribe.<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!