12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 Corrosion Control Through Organic Coatings<br />

<strong>by</strong> the fact that, as the chromium concentration in the blasting debris<br />

increased, the TCLP chromium concentration also increased.<br />

• The authors noted that the sequential acid leaching found in their testing<br />

was much more harsh than concrete is likely to experience in the field;<br />

however, it does hint that stabilization of toxic metals with portland<br />

cement will work only as long as the concrete has not broken down.<br />

5.4.3 PROBLEMS WITH ALUMINUM IN CONCRETE<br />

Not all metals can be treated with portland cement alone; aluminum in particular can<br />

be a problem. Khosla and Leming [31] investigated treatment of spent abrasive containing<br />

both lead and aluminum <strong>by</strong> portland cement. They found that aluminum particles<br />

corroded rapidly in the moist, alkaline environment of the concrete, forming hydrogen<br />

gas. The gas caused the concrete to expand and become porous, decreasing both its<br />

strength and durability. No feasible rapid-set (to avoid expansion) or slow-set (to allow<br />

for corrosion of the aluminum while the concrete was still plastic) was found in this<br />

study. (Interestingly, the amount of lead leaching was below the EPA limit despite the<br />

poor strength of the concrete.) However, Berke and colleagues [32] found that calcium<br />

nitrate was effective at delaying and reducing the corrosion of aluminum in concrete.<br />

5.4.4 TRIALS WITH PORTLAND CEMENT STABILIZATION<br />

In Finland, an on-site trial has been conducted of stabilization of blasting debris<br />

with portland cement. The Koria railroad bridge, approximately 100 m long and 125<br />

years old, was blasted with quartz sand. The initial amount of debris was 150 tons.<br />

This debris was run through a negative-pressure cyclone and then sieved to separate<br />

the debris into four classes. The amount of ‘‘problem debris” — defined in this pilot<br />

project as debris containing more than 60 mg of water-soluble heavy metals per<br />

kilogram debris —remaining after the separation processes was only 2.5 tons. This<br />

was incorporated into the concrete for bottom plates at the local disposal facility [33].<br />

The U.S. Navy has investigated ways to reduce slag abrasive disposal costs in<br />

shipyards and found two methods that are both economically and technically feasible:<br />

reusing the abrasive and stabilizing spent abrasive in concrete. In this investigation,<br />

copper slag abrasive picked up a significant amount of organic contamination (paint<br />

residue), making it unsuitable for portland cement concrete, for which strength is a<br />

requirement. It was noted, however, that the contaminated abrasive would be suitable<br />

in asphalt concrete [34].<br />

5.5 OTHER FILLER USES<br />

Blasting debris can also be incorporated as filler into asphalt and bricks. Very little<br />

is reported in the literature about these uses, in particular which chemical forms the<br />

heavy metals take, how much leaching occurs, and how permanent the whole<br />

arrangement is. In Norway, one company, Per Vestergaard Handelsselkab, has<br />

reported sales of spent blasting media for filler in asphalt since 1992 and for filler<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!