© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Corrosion Testing — Background and Theoretical Considerations 115<br />
correctly mimic the mass transport phenomena that occur in the field. There<br />
is a limit to how much we can scale down the duration of a temperature–humidity<br />
cycle in order to fit more cycles in a 24-hour period. Beyond<br />
that limit, the mass transport occurring in the test no longer mirrors that<br />
seen in the field.<br />
• Temperature/salt load/relative humidity (RH). The balance of these<br />
factors helps to determine the size of the active corrosion cell. If that is<br />
not to scale in the accelerated test, the results can diverge greatly from<br />
that seen in actual field service. Ström and Ström [1] have described<br />
instances of this imbalance in which high salt loads combined with low<br />
temperatures led to an off-scale cell.<br />
• Type of pollutant/RH. Salts such as sodium chloride (NaCl) and calcium<br />
chloride (CaCl 2) are hygroscopic but liquefy at different RHs. NaCl liquefies<br />
at 76% RH and CaCl 2 at 35% to 40% RH (depending on temperature).<br />
At an intermediate RH, for example 50% RH, the type of salt used<br />
can determine whether or not a thin film of moisture forms on the sample<br />
surface due to hygroscopic salts.<br />
Various polymers, and therefore coating types, react differently to a change in one<br />
or more of these weathering stresses. Therefore, in order to predict the service life of<br />
a coating in a particular application, it is necessary to know not only the environment<br />
— average time of wetness, amounts of airborne contaminants, UV exposure, and so<br />
on — but also how these weathering stresses affect the particular polymer [2].<br />
7.2.1 UV EXPOSURE<br />
UV exposure is extremely important in the aging and degradation of organic<br />
coatings. As the polymeric backbone of a coating is slowly broken down <strong>by</strong> UV<br />
light, the coating’s barrier properties can be expected to worsen. However, UV<br />
exposure’s importance in anticorrosion paints is strictly limited. This is because a<br />
coating can be protected from UV exposure simply <strong>by</strong> painting over it with another<br />
paint that does not transmit light.<br />
The role of UV exposure in testing anticorrosion paints may be said to be<br />
“pass/fail.” Knowing if the anticorrosion paint is sensitive to UV light is important.<br />
If it is, then it will be necessary to cover the paint with another coating to protect<br />
it from the UV light. This additional coating is routinely done in practice because<br />
the most important class of anticorrosion paints, epoxies, are notoriously sensitive<br />
to UV stress. It does not prevent epoxies from providing excellent service; rather,<br />
it merely protects them from the UV light.<br />
Because UV light itself plays no role in the corrosion process, the need for UV<br />
stress in an accelerated corrosion test is questionable.<br />
7.2.2 MOISTURE<br />
There are as many opinions about the proper amount of moisture to use in accelerated<br />
corrosion testing of paints as there are scientists in this field. The reason is almost<br />
<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>