© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Corrosion Testing — Practice 151<br />
• Water uptake and hydrolysis are greater than in the field.<br />
• A constant water film with high conductivity is present, which does<br />
not happen in the field.<br />
b. Elevated temperature<br />
• Water, oxygen, and ion transport are greater than in the field.<br />
• For some paints, the elevated temperature of the test comes close to<br />
the glass transition temperature of the binder.<br />
c. High chloride concentration (effect on corrosion depends on the type<br />
of protection the coating offers)<br />
• For sacrificial coatings, such as zinc-rich primers, the high chloride<br />
content together with the constant high humidity means that the zinc<br />
is not likely to form a passive film as it does in the field.<br />
• For inhibitive coatings, chlorides adsorb on the metal surface, where<br />
they prevent passivation.<br />
• For barrier coatings, the osmotic forces are much less than in the field;<br />
in fact, they may be reversed completely from that which is seen in<br />
reality. In the salt spray test, corrosion at a scribe or defect is exaggeratedly<br />
aggressive compared with a scribe under intact paint.<br />
Lyon, Thompson, and Johnson [56] point out that the high sodium chloride content<br />
of the salt spray test can result in corrosion morphologies and behaviors that are not<br />
representative of natural conditions. Harrison has pointed out that the test is inappropriate<br />
for use on zinc — galvanized substrates or primers with zinc phosphate pigments,<br />
for example — because, in the constant wetness of the salt spray test, zinc undergoes<br />
a corrosion mechanism that it would not undergo in real service [57]. This is a wellknown<br />
and well-documented phenomenon and is discussed in depth in chapter 7.<br />
8.4.3 IMPORTANCE OF WET/DRY CYCLING<br />
Skerry, Alavi, and Lindgren have identified three factors of importance in the degradation<br />
and corrosion of painted steel that are not modeled <strong>by</strong> the salt spray test:<br />
wet/dry cycling, a suitable choice of electrolyte, and the effects of UV radiation<br />
(critical because of the breakdown of polymer bonds in the paint) [3].<br />
Lyon, Thompson, and Johnson explain why wet/dry cycles are an important<br />
factor in an accelerated test method [56]:<br />
Many studies have shown the specific importance of wetting and drying on atmospheric<br />
corrosion... On a dry metal surface, as the relative humidity (RH) is increased, the<br />
corrosion rate initially rises, then decreases to a relatively constant value which becomes<br />
greater as the RH is increased. A similar effect is observed during physical wetting<br />
and drying of a surface. Thus, on initial wetting, the corrosion rate rises rapidly as<br />
accumulated surface salts first dissolve. The rate then decreases as the surface electrolyte<br />
dilutes with continued wetting. The corrosion rate also rises significantly during<br />
drying because of both the increasing ionic activity as the surface electrolyte concentrates<br />
<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>