12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 Corrosion Control Through Organic Coatings<br />

substrate, depending on which is the weakest link in the system. Therefore, adhesion<br />

of the primer to the metal is not necessarily what this method measures, unless it<br />

is at this interface that the adhesion is the weakest.<br />

DPO methods suffer from some additional disadvantages:<br />

• Tensile tests usually involve a complex mixture of tensile and shear forces<br />

just before the break, making interpretation difficult.<br />

• Stresses produced in the paint layer during setting of the adhesive may<br />

affect the values measured (a glue/paint interactions problem).<br />

• Nonuniform tensile load distributions over the contact area during the<br />

pulling process may occur. Stress concentrated in a portion of the contact<br />

area leads to failure at these points at lower values than would be seen<br />

under even distribution of the load. This problem usually arises from the<br />

design of the pulling head.<br />

Unlike lateral stress methods, DPO methods can be used on hard or soft coatings.<br />

As previously mentioned, however, for a well-adhering paint, these methods tend to<br />

measure the cohesive strength of the coating, rather than its adhesion to the substrate.<br />

With DPO methods, examination of the ruptured surface is possible, not only<br />

for the substrate but also for the test dolly. A point-<strong>by</strong>-point comparison of substrate<br />

and dolly surfaces makes it possible to fairly accurately determine interfacial and<br />

cohesive failure modes.<br />

8.2.2.3 Lateral Stress Methods<br />

Methods employing lateral stresses to detach a coating include bend or impact tests<br />

and scribing the coating with a knife, as in the cross-cut test.<br />

In the cross-cut test, which is the most commonly used of the lateral stress<br />

methods, knife blades scribe the coating down to the metal in a grid pattern. The<br />

spacing of the cuts is usually determined <strong>by</strong> the coating thickness. Standard guidelines<br />

are given in Table 8.2. The amount of paint removed from the areas adjacent<br />

to, but not touched <strong>by</strong>, the blades is taken as a measurement of adhesion. A standard<br />

scale for evaluation of the amount of flaking is shown in Table 8.3.<br />

Analysis of the forces involved is complex because both shear and peel can<br />

occur in the coating. The amount of shearing and peeling forces created at the knife<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong><br />

TABLE 8.2<br />

Spacing of Cuts in Cross-Cut Adhesion<br />

Coating thickness Spacing of the cuts<br />

Less than 60 µm 1 mm<br />

60 µm–120 µm 2 mm<br />

Greater than 120 µm 3 mm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!