12.02.2013 Views

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction 3<br />

• A dissolution process at the anode<br />

• A cathode site<br />

• An electrolytic path between the anode and cathode<br />

Any of these items could potentially be rate controlling. A coating that can<br />

suppress one or more of the items listed above can therefore limit the amount of<br />

corrosion. The main protection mechanisms used <strong>by</strong> organic coatings are:<br />

• Creating an effective barrier against the corrosion reactants water and<br />

oxygen<br />

• Creating a path of extremely high electrical resistance, thus inhibiting<br />

anode-cathode reactions<br />

• Passivating the metal surface with soluble pigments<br />

• Providing an alternative anode for the dissolution process<br />

The last two protection mechanisms listed above are discussed extensively in Chapter 2.<br />

This section will therefore concentrate on the first two protection mechanisms in the list<br />

above.<br />

It must be noted that it is impossible to use all these mechanisms in one coating.<br />

For example, pigments whose dissolved ions passivate the metal surface require the<br />

presence of water. This rules out their use in a true barrier coating, where water<br />

penetration is kept as low as possible.<br />

In addition, the usefulness of each mechanism depends on the service environment.<br />

Guruviah studied corrosion of coated panels under various accelerated test<br />

methods with and without sodium chloride (salt). Where salt was present, electrolytic<br />

resistance of the coatings was the dominant factor in predicting performance. However,<br />

in a generally similar method with no sodium chloride, oxygen permeation<br />

was the rate-controlling factor for the same coatings [2].<br />

1.2.1 DIFFUSION OF WATER AND OXYGEN<br />

Most coatings, except specialized barrier coatings such as chlorinated rubber, do not<br />

protect metal substrates <strong>by</strong> preventing the diffusion of water. The attractive force<br />

for water within most coatings is simply too strong. There seems to be general<br />

agreement that the amount of water that can diffuse through organic coatings of<br />

reasonable thickness is greater than that needed for the corrosion process [2–8]. Table 1.1<br />

shows the permeation rates of water vapor through several coatings as measured <strong>by</strong><br />

Thomas [9,10].<br />

The amount of water necessary for corrosion to occur at a rate of 0.07 g<br />

Fe/cm 2 /year is estimated to be 0.93 g/m 2 /day [9,10]. Thus, coatings with the lowest<br />

permeability rates might possibly be applied in sufficient thickness such that water<br />

does not reach the metal in the amounts needed for corrosion. Other coatings must<br />

provide protection through other mechanisms. Similar results have been obtained<br />

<strong>by</strong> other studies [2,11]. However, the role of water permeation through the coating<br />

cannot be completely ignored. Haagan and Funke have pointed out that, although<br />

water permeability is not normally the rate-controlling step in corrosion, it may be<br />

the rate-determining factor in adhesion loss [11].<br />

<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!