© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction 3<br />
• A dissolution process at the anode<br />
• A cathode site<br />
• An electrolytic path between the anode and cathode<br />
Any of these items could potentially be rate controlling. A coating that can<br />
suppress one or more of the items listed above can therefore limit the amount of<br />
corrosion. The main protection mechanisms used <strong>by</strong> organic coatings are:<br />
• Creating an effective barrier against the corrosion reactants water and<br />
oxygen<br />
• Creating a path of extremely high electrical resistance, thus inhibiting<br />
anode-cathode reactions<br />
• Passivating the metal surface with soluble pigments<br />
• Providing an alternative anode for the dissolution process<br />
The last two protection mechanisms listed above are discussed extensively in Chapter 2.<br />
This section will therefore concentrate on the first two protection mechanisms in the list<br />
above.<br />
It must be noted that it is impossible to use all these mechanisms in one coating.<br />
For example, pigments whose dissolved ions passivate the metal surface require the<br />
presence of water. This rules out their use in a true barrier coating, where water<br />
penetration is kept as low as possible.<br />
In addition, the usefulness of each mechanism depends on the service environment.<br />
Guruviah studied corrosion of coated panels under various accelerated test<br />
methods with and without sodium chloride (salt). Where salt was present, electrolytic<br />
resistance of the coatings was the dominant factor in predicting performance. However,<br />
in a generally similar method with no sodium chloride, oxygen permeation<br />
was the rate-controlling factor for the same coatings [2].<br />
1.2.1 DIFFUSION OF WATER AND OXYGEN<br />
Most coatings, except specialized barrier coatings such as chlorinated rubber, do not<br />
protect metal substrates <strong>by</strong> preventing the diffusion of water. The attractive force<br />
for water within most coatings is simply too strong. There seems to be general<br />
agreement that the amount of water that can diffuse through organic coatings of<br />
reasonable thickness is greater than that needed for the corrosion process [2–8]. Table 1.1<br />
shows the permeation rates of water vapor through several coatings as measured <strong>by</strong><br />
Thomas [9,10].<br />
The amount of water necessary for corrosion to occur at a rate of 0.07 g<br />
Fe/cm 2 /year is estimated to be 0.93 g/m 2 /day [9,10]. Thus, coatings with the lowest<br />
permeability rates might possibly be applied in sufficient thickness such that water<br />
does not reach the metal in the amounts needed for corrosion. Other coatings must<br />
provide protection through other mechanisms. Similar results have been obtained<br />
<strong>by</strong> other studies [2,11]. However, the role of water permeation through the coating<br />
cannot be completely ignored. Haagan and Funke have pointed out that, although<br />
water permeability is not normally the rate-controlling step in corrosion, it may be<br />
the rate-determining factor in adhesion loss [11].<br />
<strong>©</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Taylor</strong> & <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, <strong>LLC</strong>