15.02.2013 Views

world cancer report - iarc

world cancer report - iarc

world cancer report - iarc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

industries, processes and occupations that<br />

are deemed to be dangerous for children<br />

has been set out by the Philippines.<br />

Prevention of occupational <strong>cancer</strong> may<br />

positively affect general environmental<br />

conditions. A study of conditions at the<br />

Huannan coal mine, China, established that<br />

from 1953 to the 1980s underground dust<br />

Pollutant Decrease<br />

Carbon monoxide (CO) 37%<br />

Lead 78%<br />

Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) 14%<br />

Ozone 6%<br />

Particles of ≤10 µm diameter (PM-10) 22%<br />

PM-10 measurements began in 1988<br />

Sulfur dioxide (SO 2) 37%<br />

Table 4.5 Percent decrease in air concentrations of six key air pollutants, USA (1986-1995).<br />

138 Prevention and screening<br />

levels decreased from 266 mg/m 3 to 1.3<br />

mg/m 3, and this coincided with marked<br />

improvement in housing conditions, water<br />

quality, nutrition and sanitation [8].<br />

Environmental pollution<br />

The prevention of <strong>cancer</strong> caused by environmental<br />

pollution might be expected to<br />

follow the same principles and approaches<br />

adopted for prevention of occupational<br />

<strong>cancer</strong>. However, control of carcinogenic<br />

hazards in the general environment is usually<br />

more complex than at the workplace.<br />

Among other things, environmental pollution<br />

usually derives from many sources.<br />

Moreover, exposure levels vary greatly<br />

over space and time. Measures to reduce<br />

pollution can rarely be correlated with<br />

reduced <strong>cancer</strong> incidence. A decreased<br />

incidence of lung <strong>cancer</strong>, for example,<br />

cannot be attributed to reduced air pollution<br />

against a high background of tobac-<br />

Compound Average ambient Cancer associated IARC classification<br />

air concentration [mg/m 3]<br />

Acetaldehyde 5 Nasal tumours in rats 2B<br />

Acrylonitrile 0.01 - 10 Lung <strong>cancer</strong> in workers 2A<br />

Arsenic (1 - 30) x 10 -3 Lung <strong>cancer</strong> in humans 1<br />

Benzo[a]pyrene No data Lung <strong>cancer</strong> in humans 1<br />

Bis(chloromethyl)ether No data Epitheliomas in rats 1<br />

Chloroform 0.3-10 Kidney tumours in rats 2B<br />

Chromium VI (5 - 200) x 10 -3 Lung <strong>cancer</strong> in workers 1<br />

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.07 – 4 Tumour formation in rodents 2B<br />

Diesel exhaust 1.0 - 10.0 Lung <strong>cancer</strong> 2A<br />

Nickel 1 - 180 Lung <strong>cancer</strong> in humans 1<br />

Polycyclic aromatic (1 - 10) x 10 -3 Lung <strong>cancer</strong> in humans 1<br />

hydrocarbons (benzo[a]pyrene)<br />

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.1 - 0.7 Hepatocellular carcinomas in mice 3<br />

Trichloroethylene 1 – 10 Cell tumours in testes of rats 2A<br />

Vinyl chloride 0.1 – 10 Haemangiosarcoma in workers 1<br />

Liver <strong>cancer</strong> in workers<br />

Table 4.6 WHO guidelines (1999) for air pollutants with carcinogenic health end-points. These substances have been classified by IARC as either human carcinogens<br />

(Group 1), probable human carcinogens (Group 2A) or possible human carcinogens (Group 2B).endpoints

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!