world cancer report - iarc
world cancer report - iarc
world cancer report - iarc
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY<br />
In 1982, “molecular <strong>cancer</strong> epidemiology”<br />
was defined as “an approach in which<br />
advanced laboratory methods are used in<br />
combination with analytic epidemiology to<br />
identify at the biochemical or molecular<br />
level specific exogenous and/or host factors<br />
that play a role in human <strong>cancer</strong> causation”<br />
(Perera FP, Weinstein IB, J Chron<br />
Dis 35: 58l-600, 1982). Four categories of<br />
biomarkers were described: internal dose,<br />
biologically effective dose, response, and<br />
susceptibility. The hope was that, by introducing<br />
biomarkers into epidemiology,<br />
researchers “should be able to predict<br />
human risks more precisely than hitherto<br />
possible”. Since then, molecular <strong>cancer</strong><br />
epidemiology has evolved rapidly, with<br />
special programmes in many schools of<br />
public health.<br />
The stated goal of molecular <strong>cancer</strong> epidemiology<br />
is the prevention of <strong>cancer</strong>.<br />
Considerable molecular epidemiologic<br />
research has focused on environmental<br />
causes because many lines of evidence<br />
indicate that the factors that determine<br />
the great majority of <strong>cancer</strong>s incidence<br />
are largely exogenous and hence preventable<br />
(Lichenstein P et al., N Engl J Med<br />
343: 78-85, 2000). These include exposures<br />
related to lifestyle and occupation,<br />
and pollutants in air, water, and the food<br />
supply. This awareness has lent greater<br />
urgency to the search for more powerful<br />
tools in the form of early-warning systems<br />
to identify causal environmental agents<br />
and flag risks well before the malignant<br />
process is entrenched.<br />
other organochlorine pesticides cause<br />
liver <strong>cancer</strong> in rats. DDT in particular<br />
has been associated with increased risk<br />
of pancreatic <strong>cancer</strong>, breast <strong>cancer</strong>,<br />
lymphoma and leukaemia in humans.<br />
Some organochlorines exhibit sex<br />
steroid activity in relevant assay systems,<br />
and these pesticides are consid-<br />
EXPOSURE<br />
ASSESSMENT MARKERS OF DOSE<br />
EARLY DETECTION & CLINICAL<br />
POPULATION<br />
STATISTICS<br />
TO HUMANS<br />
PROGNOSTIC MARKERS DISEASE<br />
Environmental<br />
or<br />
endogenous<br />
agents<br />
Absorption<br />
Distribution<br />
Metabolism<br />
Metabolites<br />
in body fluid<br />
& excreta<br />
Potential molecular endpoints (specified in the lower section) that may serve as the basis for molecular epidemiological<br />
studies. These endpoints may be indicative of biological processes contributing to <strong>cancer</strong> development<br />
as shown in the upper section.<br />
The potential contribution of molecular epidemiology<br />
includes: providing evidence<br />
that environmental agents pose carcinogenic<br />
risks, helping establish the causal<br />
roles of environmental factors in <strong>cancer</strong>,<br />
identifying environment-susceptibility<br />
interactions and populations at greatest<br />
risk and developing new intervention<br />
strategies. A recent review of the field<br />
(Perera F, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92: 602-612,<br />
2000) critically evaluated the progress to<br />
date using as illustration research on<br />
tobacco smoke, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,<br />
aflatoxin B 1, benzene and hepatitis<br />
B virus and their role in lung, breast,<br />
liver <strong>cancer</strong> and leukaemia. It concluded<br />
ered to have the potential to disrupt<br />
endocrine-regulated homeostasis.<br />
Attempts have been made to correlate<br />
levels of organochlorines and polychlorinated<br />
biphenyls in breast tissue with<br />
breast <strong>cancer</strong> risk in several communities,<br />
but without clear-cut results [8].<br />
For the major pesticides, international<br />
PRIMARY PREVENTION AND CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS<br />
DNA adducts,<br />
protein adducts<br />
Repair<br />
Replication<br />
Mutation in<br />
<strong>report</strong>er genes,<br />
oncogenes,<br />
supressor genes<br />
SUSCEPTIBILITY FACTORS<br />
genetic/environmental<br />
Cell proliferation<br />
Clonal expansion<br />
Genomic<br />
instability,<br />
abberrant gene<br />
expression,<br />
altered<br />
cell structure<br />
Further<br />
genetic<br />
change<br />
Malignant<br />
tumour<br />
that molecular epidemiology has identified<br />
a number of carcinogenic hazards, in<br />
some cases providing definitive etiologic<br />
data, furthering our understanding of individual<br />
genetic and acquired susceptibility<br />
to environmental carcinogens. However,<br />
molecular epidemiology has not yet led to<br />
broad policy changes to prevent or to<br />
reduce exposure to carcinogens. What is<br />
now needed is timely translation of existing<br />
data into risk assessment and public<br />
health policy as well as focused research<br />
to fill gaps in scientific knowledge.<br />
regulations exist with regard to permissible<br />
amounts of residues in foods – the<br />
ADI, or acceptable daily intake, being<br />
the primary reference level for such<br />
exposures. ADI levels are determined by<br />
expert groups convened by WHO, and<br />
published as the WHO Pesticide Residue<br />
Series.<br />
Food contaminants 45