01.06.2013 Views

7° Congresso Nazionale

7° Congresso Nazionale

7° Congresso Nazionale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46<br />

<strong>7°</strong> <strong>Congresso</strong> <strong>Nazionale</strong> Associazione Italiana di Endourologia<br />

Table 3.<br />

Comparison of results in blood loss in various nephrostomy tract techniques.<br />

Technique Patients Ext. blood loss p (Miniperc vs all other)<br />

Miniperc 63 (actual series) 0,65 ± 1,05 g/dL<br />

Alken dilators 59 (previous series) 2,08 ± 1,43 g/dL < 0,001<br />

One- Shot 36 (previous series) 1,64 ± 0,95 g/dL < 0,05<br />

Pneumatic dilation 15 (previous series) 1,90 ± 1,12 g/dL < 0,02<br />

for patients with Alken dilators access; 4,75 + 1,99 days<br />

(range 2-13 days) for patients with One-Shot access;<br />

4,46 + 1,06 days (range 3-7 days) for patients with pneumatic<br />

dilation access; the data not reaches statistical significance,<br />

but the mean hospital stay after miniperc procedures<br />

seems shorter than after standard procedures.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Considering the literature that shows experiences mainly<br />

in paediatric surgery with different nephrostomic<br />

approach (reported range 11-24 Fr) it is opportune to<br />

put a limit to the mini percutaneous procedure. We agree<br />

to identifying “MINI perc” technique only to nephrostomic<br />

approach ≤ 14 Fr and have manufactured the set<br />

in accordance.<br />

Superior approach cannot be intended Mini procedures<br />

but just “MIDI”. Please consider that the main manufactures<br />

of endourologic equipment are moving in accordance<br />

with this line. In case of failure or operation difficulties<br />

the approach can be easily converted and<br />

increased to allow standard procedures.<br />

The limits of this technique are: major operation times<br />

and consequently major costs; more difficulties in vision<br />

and operability. The advantages are: less trauma, reduction<br />

of bleeding, possibility of tubeless procedures and<br />

shorter recovery times.<br />

Supine position is certainly a step forward in terms of<br />

reducing operative times and percentage of clearance of<br />

the fragments. In fact the LASER lithotripsy and the<br />

decubitus allow litholopaxy of the fragments thanks to<br />

the gravity and the retrograde continuous irrigation.<br />

Moreover the possibility of using flexible ureteroscopes<br />

allows a better access to all the kidney calices and consequently<br />

an easier extraction of fragments.<br />

We estimate, with the right indications, that the Miniperc<br />

should be more and more adopted by modern endourol-<br />

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2007, 79, 3, Supplemento 1<br />

ogists. The progress mainly in optics and the miniaturization<br />

of instruments will make the procedure more<br />

useful and effective.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Traxer O, Smith Thomas G.III, Pearle M S, Corvin T S,<br />

Saboorian H, Careddu JA: Renal parenchymal injury after standard<br />

and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 2001;<br />

165(5):1693-1695.<br />

2. Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Careddu JA et al: The “miniperc” tecnique:<br />

a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.<br />

World J Urol 1998; 16:371-374.<br />

3. Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, et al: The Hickman peelaway<br />

sheath:alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J<br />

Endourol 1997; 11:171-172<br />

4. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC:<br />

Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous<br />

nephrolithotomy. Urology 2001; 58(3):345-350.<br />

5. Chan D-Y; Jarrett TW: Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.<br />

J.Endourol. 2000; 14(3):269-273.<br />

6. Bhargava A.,Gupta V.K: Role of “Mini-perc” in the management<br />

of urolithiasis.(abstract FP4-4) J Endourol 2003 (suppl) A36.<br />

7. Monga M, Oglevie S : Mini-Percutaneous nephrolithotomy:<br />

extended experience and follow-up.(abstract FP4-12) J Endourol<br />

2003 (suppl) A38.<br />

8. Desai M, Ridhorkar V, Patel S et al.: Pediatric percutnaeous<br />

nephrolithotomy : assessing impact of technical innovations on safety<br />

and efficacy. J Enrodurol 1999; 13(5):359-64.<br />

9. Zattoni F, Passerini-Glazel G, Tasca A.: Pediatric nephroscope for<br />

percutaneous stone removal. Urology 1989; 33:404-406.<br />

10. Frattini A, Barbieri A, Salsi P, Sebastio N, Ferretti S,<br />

Bergamaschi E, Cortellini P. One shot: A novel method to dilate the<br />

nephrostomy access for percutaneous lithotripsy. J Endourol 2001;<br />

15 (9):919-923.<br />

Correspondence: Stefania Ferretti M.D., Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Parma, via Gramsci, 14 – 43100 Parma, Italy<br />

E-mail: ferretti@ao.pr.it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!