Latvijas Vēsturnieku komisijas raksti - 23.sējums

156 Konferences “Baltija Otrajā pasaules karā (1939–1945)” referāti par holokausta tematiku
References
1 Martin Cüppers, Wegbereiter der Shoah: Die Waffen-SS, der Kommandostab Reichsführer-SS und
die Judenvernichtung 1939–1945 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliches Buchgesellschaft, 2005).
2 See, for example, Ruth Bettina Birn’s discussion of the dramatically increased power of the Höhere
SS- und Polizeiführer (HSSPF) in the occupied East as compared with the more limited original
position of this office in Germany proper: Ruth Bettina Birn, Die Höheren SS- und Polizeiführer:
Himmlers Vertreter im Reich und den Besetzten Gebieten (Düsseldorf: Droste, 1986).
3 Cf. Hans-Dietrich Loock, “Zur ‘großgermanischen Politik’ des Dritten Reiches”, Vierteljahreshefte für
Zeitgeschichte 8 (1960), no. 1: pp. 62–3.
4 Mark P. Gingerich, “Waffen SS Recruitment in the ‘Germanic Lands’, 1940–1941”, The Historian
59 (1997), no. 4: pp. 817–8.
5 E.g. Hans F.K. Günther, Rassenkunde des deutschen Volkes, 15th ed. (Munich: J.F. Lehmanns Verlag,
1930), p. 192 fn. 2.
6 Harold Skilbred, “The SS and ‘Germanic’ Fascism during World War II”, Ph.D. diss. (University of
California, Berkeley, 1974), pp. 193–225.
7 Skilbred, pp. 5–7.
8 The historiography of this period has up to now mainly focussed upon the struggle between Quisling
(initially supported by the Wehrmacht, particularly the Kriegsmarine) and Terboven for power and
influence in the summer of 1940. Cf.: Robert Bohn, “Die Instrumentarien der deutschen Herrschaft im
Reichskommissariat Norwegen” in: Robert Bohn (ed.), Die deutsche Herrschaft in den “germanischen”
Ländern 1940–1945 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1997), pp. 72–73. This approach, however, ignores
the markedly diverging ambitions of Terboven and the SS. For example, in this version Stahlecker
is portrayed as championing Terboven’s interests when he attempts to marginalise Quisling, e.g.:
Sverre Rødder, “Min ære er troskap”: Om politiminister Jonas Lie (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1990), p. 90.
9 Nuremberg Document L-180, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military
Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945–1 October 1946, English ed., (Nuremberg: [s.n.], 1947–9;
hereafter – IMT Blue Series), vol. 37, pp. 670–717.
10 Michael Wildt, Generation des Unbedingten: Das Führerkorps des Reichssicherheitshauptamtes
(Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 2003), p. 509.
11 Magne Skodvin, Striden om okkupasjonsstyret i Norge: Fram til 25. september 1940 (Oslo: Det norske
Samlaget, 1956), pp. 157–9, 161, 272; Rødder, pp. 89–93.
12 Birn, pp. 216–8, 343, 348.
13 Skodvin, p. 340; Wildt, p. 510.
14 Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm, Die Einsatzgruppe A der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD 1941/42 (Frankfurt
a.M. &c.: Peter Lang, 1996), p. 489; Wildt, p. 509.
15 Wilhelm, pp. 478–9; Wildt, pp. 509–10; cf. Bundesarchiv-Lichterfeld (BArch) (former BDC), SSO-Akten,
Erich Ehrlinger, roll 177, frame 351.
16 Gingerich, p. 818.
17 Wilhelm, p. 479.
18 Cf. Gingerich, p. 830.
19 Skilbred, p. 74. Later, in 1942, rumours surrounding the role of Regiment Nordland in the resurrection
of the Norwegian armed forces resurfaced in an article in Helsinki’s Hufvudstadsbladet, which caused
Berger some consternation: BArch, NS 19/1576.