24.12.2014 Views

Letnik 9/2, september 2007 - Slovenska vojska

Letnik 9/2, september 2007 - Slovenska vojska

Letnik 9/2, september 2007 - Slovenska vojska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ralf Klewin-von Fintel<br />

and developing threat situation, as assessed by German politicians and security<br />

organizations in the European context already in previous years I think I can say<br />

at this juncture that the latter is closest to the truth. Although they apply only to the<br />

Federal Ministry of Defence’s area of responsibility, the Defence Policy Guidelines<br />

[Verteidigungspolitische Richtlinien] of May 2003 contain a chapter entitled<br />

“German Security: Risks and Opportunities”, which already clearly emphasizes<br />

that 9/11 and the subsequent terrorist attacks have heightened the awareness that<br />

asymmetric threats may occur at any time and anywhere in the world, and may be<br />

directed against anyone 6 . Furthermore, the European Security Strategy, which was<br />

enacted at the European level in December 2003, puts terrorism at the top of its<br />

list of key threats to European security, due to its status as an increasing strategic<br />

threat to Europe, ahead of organized crime, state failure, regional conflicts and the<br />

proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It states, inter alia, that: “...Europe<br />

is both a target and a base for such terrorism: European countries are targets and<br />

have been attacked. Logistical bases for al-Qaeda cells have been uncovered in the<br />

United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Spain and Belgium. Concerted European action<br />

is indispensable. 7 ” The Security Strategy also gives serious consideration to what<br />

is undoubtedly the most frightening scenario, namely that terrorist groups could<br />

acquire weapons of mass destruction. At this stage, I believe that the question<br />

raised in the interview quoted at the beginning of this paper can already be given<br />

a clear answer. Irreconcilable differences most certainly do not exist in the US and<br />

German assessments of the threat posed by terrorism. In the following remarks, I<br />

will consider this assertion in more detail by endeavoring to address the question of<br />

the German threat assessment of terrorism in Germany.<br />

A G E R M A N T H R E AT A S S E S S M E N T<br />

The German Federal Ministry of the Interior stated unequivocally in May 2005<br />

that Islamist extremism and terrorism pose the most significant threat to internal<br />

security both globally and within Germany 8 . Germany’s internal security was and<br />

6<br />

German Federal Ministry of Defence, Verteidigungspolitische Richtlinien für den Geschäftsbereich des Bundesministeriums<br />

der Verteidigung [Defence Policy Guidelines for the Area of Responsibility of the Ministry of<br />

Defence], Berlin, May 21, 2003, p.6.<br />

7<br />

EU, A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy, Brussels, 2003, p.3.<br />

8<br />

See German Federal Ministry of the Interior, Verfassungsschutzbericht 2004 [2004 Report on the Protection of<br />

the Constitution], Berlin, 2005, pp.3f.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!