22.02.2013 Views

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fragments <strong>of</strong> amphiboles are less potent than<br />

asbestos fibers [Mossman 2008].<br />

In summary, <strong>the</strong>re is more literature now than in<br />

1990 pertaining to differential animal carcinogenicity<br />

<strong>and</strong> toxicity <strong>of</strong> EMPs from nonasbestiform<br />

amphiboles (e.g., acicular crystals, prismatic<br />

crys tals, <strong>and</strong> cleavage fragments). The number <strong>of</strong><br />

studies is limited <strong>and</strong> each study has limitations,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y suggest that nonasbestiform amphiboles<br />

might pose different risks than asbestos. More<br />

detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies, including<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> important limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studies,<br />

can be found in Section 2.8.4 <strong>of</strong> this document.<br />

2.7.1.1.3 Analytical Limitations<br />

The third element that served as a basis for<br />

NIOSH’s 1990 recommendation that non asbestiform<br />

analogs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asbestos minerals be encompassed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> REL was <strong>the</strong> inability to accurately<br />

<strong>and</strong> consistently distinguish asbestos fibers <strong>and</strong><br />

nonasbestiform EMPs in samples <strong>of</strong> airborne<br />

particulate. The 1990 NIOSH testimony argued<br />

that asbestiform <strong>and</strong> nonasbestiform minerals<br />

can occur in <strong>the</strong> same geological area <strong>and</strong> that<br />

mixed exposures to airborne asbestos fibers <strong>and</strong><br />

EMPs from <strong>the</strong> nonasbestiform analog minerals<br />

can occur at mining operations. The potential for<br />

mixed exposures can also occur downstream if<br />

<strong>the</strong> mined commodity contains both asbestiform<br />

<strong>and</strong> nonasbestiform minerals.<br />

The 1990 NIOSH testimony fur<strong>the</strong>r pointed<br />

out <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> routine analytical methods for<br />

air samples that can accurately <strong>and</strong> consistently<br />

determine whe<strong>the</strong>r an individual EMP that<br />

meets <strong>the</strong> dimensional criteria <strong>of</strong> a countable<br />

particle is an asbestos fiber or a nonasbestiform<br />

EMP (e.g., acicular crystals, prismatic crystals,<br />

cleavage fragments).<br />

32<br />

Two analytical components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NIOSH REL<br />

for airborne asbestos fibers are applied to air<br />

samples: <strong>the</strong> microscopic methods <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

counting rules. The microscopic methods include<br />

<strong>the</strong> following:<br />

• Phase contrast microscopy (PCM)—Analytical<br />

Method 7400 “A rules”—<strong>Asbestos</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>O<strong>the</strong>r</strong> <strong>Fibers</strong> by PCM [NIOSH<br />

1994a] is used to count all particles that<br />

are longer than 5 µm <strong>and</strong> have a lengthto-width<br />

ratio equal to or greater than 3:1.<br />

• Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)—<br />

Analytical Method 7402—<strong>Asbestos</strong> by<br />

TEM [NIOSH 1994b] is used as a supplement<br />

to <strong>the</strong> PCM method when <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is uncertainty about <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong><br />

elongate particles (EPs) that are counted.<br />

When TEM analysis is used for particle<br />

identification, only those EPs that<br />

are identified as “asbestos” <strong>and</strong> meet<br />

<strong>the</strong> dimensional criteria used by PCM<br />

(>0.25 µm width <strong>and</strong> >5 µm length) are<br />

counted as asbestos fibers. PCM counts<br />

can be adjusted to yield corrected asbestos<br />

fiber counts by multiplying <strong>the</strong>m by<br />

<strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> fibers determined by<br />

TEM to be asbestos.<br />

There are several limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> PCM<br />

<strong>and</strong> TEM for asbestos analysis. PCM is stated<br />

to be limited to observing EPs with widths<br />

>0.25 µm <strong>and</strong> is not equipped for particle identification.<br />

TEM, although capable <strong>of</strong> resolving<br />

EPs with widths as small as 0.001 µm, frequently<br />

cannot differentiate nonasbestiform from<br />

asbestiform EMPs when <strong>the</strong> elemental composition<br />

is <strong>the</strong> same or when present in a heterogeneous<br />

mix <strong>of</strong> unknown particles. A potential<br />

limitation <strong>of</strong> TEM is that partial lengths <strong>of</strong><br />

long fibers may not be observed because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

intersect grid bars or lie partially outside <strong>the</strong><br />

small field <strong>of</strong> view. However, this is likely to<br />

NIOSH CIB 62 • <strong>Asbestos</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!