22.02.2013 Views

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• For rats <strong>and</strong> hamsters, alveolar deposition<br />

becomes practically zero when particle<br />

AED exceeds 3.0 µm <strong>and</strong> aspect ratio exceeds<br />

10. In contrast, considerable alveolar<br />

deposition is found for humans breathing<br />

at rest, even for EPs with AEDs approaching<br />

5 µm <strong>and</strong> aspect ratio exceeding 10.<br />

• Rodents have smaller-diameter airways<br />

than humans, a characteristic which increases<br />

<strong>the</strong> chance for particle deposition<br />

via contact with airway surfaces.<br />

• Turbulent air flow, which enhances particle<br />

deposition via impaction, is common in<br />

human airways but rare in rodent airways.<br />

• Variations in airway branching patterns<br />

may account for significant differences<br />

in deposition between humans <strong>and</strong> rodents.<br />

Human airways are characterized<br />

by symmetrical branching, wherein each<br />

bifurcation is located near <strong>the</strong> centerline<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parent airway. This symmetry favors<br />

deposition “hotspots” on carinal<br />

ridges at <strong>the</strong> bifurcations due to disrupted<br />

airstreams <strong>and</strong> local turbulence. Rodent<br />

airways are characterized by asymmetric<br />

branching, which results in a more diffuse<br />

deposition pattern because <strong>the</strong> bulk flow<br />

<strong>of</strong> inspired air follows <strong>the</strong> major airways<br />

with little change in velocity or direction.<br />

• Alveolar clearance is slower in humans<br />

than in rats. Human dosimetry models<br />

predict that, at nonoverloading exposure<br />

concentrations, a greater proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

particles deposited in <strong>the</strong> alveolar region<br />

will be interstitialized <strong>and</strong> sequestered in<br />

humans than in rats.<br />

An important consideration in <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>and</strong><br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> animal studies is <strong>the</strong> selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> well characterized (with respect to chemical<br />

<strong>and</strong> physical parameters) <strong>and</strong> appropriately<br />

sized EMPs that take into account differences<br />

NIOSH CIB 62 • <strong>Asbestos</strong><br />

in deposition <strong>and</strong> clearance characteristics<br />

between rodents <strong>and</strong> humans. EMPs that are<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> being deposited in <strong>the</strong> bronchoalveolar<br />

region <strong>of</strong> humans cannot be completely<br />

evaluated in animal inhalation studies because<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum thoracic size for particles in rodents<br />

is approximately 2 µm AED, which is<br />

less than <strong>the</strong> maximum thoracic size <strong>of</strong> about<br />

3 µm AED for humans [Timbrell 1982; Su <strong>and</strong><br />

Cheng 2005].<br />

3.4.2.1 Short-Term Animal Studies<br />

There are several advantages to conducting<br />

short-term animal studies in rats; one is that<br />

<strong>the</strong> information gained (e.g., regarding overload<br />

<strong>and</strong> maximum tolerated dose [MTD])<br />

can be used to more effectively design chronic<br />

inhalation studies [ILSI 2005]. The objectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies would be to<br />

• Evaluate EMP deposition, translocation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> clearance mechanisms;<br />

• Compare <strong>the</strong> biopersistence <strong>of</strong> EMPs retained<br />

in <strong>the</strong> lung with results from in vitro<br />

durability assays;<br />

• Compare in vivo pulmonary responses to<br />

in vitro bioactivity for EMPs <strong>of</strong> different<br />

dimensions; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Compare cancer <strong>and</strong> noncancer toxicities<br />

for EMPs from asbestiform <strong>and</strong> nonasbestiform<br />

amphibole mineral varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

varying shapes, as well as within narrow<br />

ranges <strong>of</strong> length <strong>and</strong> width.<br />

More fundamental studies should also be performed<br />

to<br />

• Identify biomarkers or tracer/imaging<br />

methods that could be used to predict or<br />

monitor active pulmonary inflammation,<br />

pulmonary fibrosis, <strong>and</strong> malignant transformation;<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!