22.02.2013 Views

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sedimentation, <strong>and</strong> diffusion [Asgharian <strong>and</strong><br />

Yu 1988]. In a study to assess EP deposition in<br />

<strong>the</strong> tracheobronchial region, Zhou et al. [2007]<br />

evaluated <strong>the</strong> deposition efficiencies <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

fibers (3.66 µm diameter), using two human<br />

airway replicas that consisted <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oral cavity,<br />

pharynx, larynx, trachea, <strong>and</strong> three to four generations<br />

<strong>of</strong> bronchi. Carbon fiber deposition<br />

was found to increase with <strong>the</strong> Stokes number,<br />

indicating that inertial impaction is <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />

mechanism. Also, fiber deposition in <strong>the</strong><br />

tracheobronchial region was lower than that <strong>of</strong><br />

spherical particles at a given Stokes number,<br />

indicating a greater likelihood for small-width<br />

EPs to move past <strong>the</strong> upper respiratory tract<br />

<strong>and</strong> reach <strong>the</strong> lower airways where diffusional<br />

deposition predominates [Yu et al.1986].<br />

These results were confirmed by results <strong>of</strong> later<br />

studies evaluating <strong>the</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> asbestos,<br />

using a similar tracheobronchial cast model<br />

[Sussman et al. 1991a, b]. The probability <strong>of</strong><br />

deposition <strong>of</strong> a particle in a specific location in<br />

<strong>the</strong> airways is not <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> penetration to that region, <strong>and</strong> for particles<br />

in a certain range <strong>of</strong> AEDs, <strong>the</strong> difference between<br />

penetration <strong>and</strong> deposition may be substantial<br />

[ICRP 1994].<br />

2.9.2 Clearance <strong>and</strong> Retention<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> mechanisms are associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

removal <strong>of</strong> deposited particles from <strong>the</strong> respiratory<br />

tract [Warheit 1989]. Physical clearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> insoluble particles deposited in <strong>the</strong> lung is<br />

an important physiological defense mechanism<br />

that usually serves to moderate any risk that<br />

might o<strong>the</strong>rwise be associated with exposure to<br />

particles. Inhaled particles that deposit on respiratory<br />

tract surfaces may be physically cleared<br />

by <strong>the</strong> tracheobronchial mucociliary escalator<br />

or nasal mucus flow to <strong>the</strong> throat, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong>y may be ei<strong>the</strong>r expectorated or swallowed.<br />

40<br />

Clearance depends upon <strong>the</strong> physicochemical<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inhaled particles, <strong>the</strong> sites <strong>of</strong><br />

deposition, <strong>and</strong> respiratory anatomy <strong>and</strong> physiology.<br />

For example, inhaled insoluble particles<br />

with larger AEDs tend to deposit on <strong>the</strong><br />

nasopharyngeal mucus <strong>and</strong> are generally cleared<br />

by sneezing or nose blowing or by flow into <strong>the</strong><br />

oropharynx, where <strong>the</strong>y are swallowed. Insoluble<br />

particles with smaller AEDs tend to deposit<br />

lower in <strong>the</strong> respiratory tract, with associated<br />

longer retention times. Those deposited in <strong>the</strong><br />

alveolar region are subject to longer retention<br />

times than those deposited on <strong>the</strong> bronchial region<br />

[Lippmann <strong>and</strong> Esch 1988].<br />

The most important process for removal <strong>of</strong> insoluble<br />

particles from <strong>the</strong> airways is mucociliary<br />

clearance, which involves a layer <strong>of</strong> mucus propelled<br />

by <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> ciliated airway cells<br />

that line <strong>the</strong> trachea, bronchi, <strong>and</strong> terminal<br />

bronchioles [Warheit 1989]. The mucociliary<br />

transport system is sensitive to a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

agents, including cigarette smoke <strong>and</strong> ozone<br />

[Vastag et al. 1985]. These toxicants affect <strong>the</strong><br />

speed <strong>of</strong> mucus flow <strong>and</strong> consequent particle<br />

clearance by altering ciliary action <strong>and</strong>/or modifying<br />

<strong>the</strong> properties <strong>and</strong>/or amount <strong>of</strong> mucus.<br />

Chronic exposure to cigarette smoke has been<br />

shown to cause a prolonged impairment <strong>of</strong> particulate<br />

clearance from <strong>the</strong> bronchial region.<br />

This impaired clearance is associated with increased<br />

retention <strong>of</strong> asbestos fibers in <strong>the</strong> bronchi,<br />

where <strong>the</strong>y stimulate inflammatory processes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> bronchial epi<strong>the</strong>lium [Churg <strong>and</strong><br />

Stevens 1995; Churg et al. 1992].<br />

Because <strong>the</strong> alveolar region <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lung does<br />

not possess mucociliary clearance capability,<br />

particles (generally

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!