26.02.2013 Views

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

people (million)<br />

Pilot subsidies for forest management<br />

In 2009, the subsidy for forest management was taken as part <strong>of</strong> the central budget. An amount <strong>of</strong> US$<br />

73.86 million was invested <strong>to</strong> subsidize the tending <strong>of</strong> middle and young-aged stands. This subsidy was<br />

increased <strong>to</strong> US$ 295.44 million in 2010. During the year, the central government allocated US$ 29.54<br />

million <strong>to</strong> the forest seed pilot and US$ 44.32 million <strong>to</strong> the afforestation pilot. However, the current<br />

afforestation subsidy is limited <strong>to</strong> key forest ecological projects.<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Poverty</strong> Reduction Policies<br />

After 30 years <strong>of</strong> continuous efforts, China’s rural poverty reduction has made remarkable achievements<br />

and progress in achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Some goals and sub-goals as halving<br />

extreme poverty, rolling back child mortality, providing universal primary education and safe drinking<br />

water have already been achieved, alleviating rural poverty significantly.<br />

Through the first three stages <strong>of</strong> rural poverty reduction in China, the population in absolute poverty in<br />

the countryside decreased from 250 million in 1978 <strong>to</strong> 30 million in 2000, and poverty incidence from<br />

30.7% in 1978 <strong>to</strong> 3% in 2000. During the fourth stage, the poor population rose <strong>to</strong> 35.97 million because<br />

the poverty standard rose from US$ 116 in 2007 <strong>to</strong> US$ 158 in 2009.<br />

In recent years, the implementation <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> important forestry policies such as NKFP and forestry<br />

reform has not only improved China’s environment, but has also helped poverty reduction. The CCFP,<br />

for instance, not only effectively curbs soil erosion <strong>of</strong> the ecologically fragile areas but also benefits<br />

nearly 20% <strong>of</strong> the farmers with a grant budget <strong>of</strong> over US$ 26.59 billion. The CCFP plays an important<br />

role in rural poverty reduction.<br />

Meanwhile, the forestry construction program funded through a WB loan is another channel for poverty<br />

reduction and is led by government with participation from concerned program entities (i.e. stateowned<br />

forest farms, collective forest farms, farmers, and forestry companies) and research institutes.<br />

Successfully completed in 2006, the “forestry development program in poverty areas” through a loan<br />

from the WB covered 216 counties in 12 provinces, and benefited 3.83 million poor. Income per capita<br />

increased <strong>to</strong> an average <strong>of</strong> US$ 84.60 and doubled after the program (Zhang Jianlong 2008).<br />

Figure III.2. China’s rural poverty population and changes <strong>of</strong> poverty incidence<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

1978 1985 1993 2000 2009<br />

rural poverty population rural poverty incidence<br />

Source: China Rural <strong>Poverty</strong> Moni<strong>to</strong>ring Report 2009 and other public information.<br />

Despite the progress in poverty reduction in the past 30 years, there have been many problems and<br />

challenges in rural poverty reduction in recent years. First, education, health and other basic public<br />

services lag behind, and the self-development capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers in poverty areas is weak. Second,<br />

limitations persist in the existing poverty reduction policies, such as the unsound evaluation system<br />

on poverty reduction and unregulated use and management <strong>of</strong> the poverty reduction fund. Third, the<br />

harsh natural environment seriously affects people’s productivity and living conditions in some poor<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!