26.02.2013 Views

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Livelihood and poverty context in the forests<br />

It has been observed that in areas where forests are still substantial and forest resources abound, poverty<br />

incidence tends <strong>to</strong> be higher. Family income in these areas usually falls below the poverty thresholds<br />

as forests can only provide subsistence livelihoods, especially in isolated areas. However, there are<br />

unaccounted incomes received by upland households for free like fuelwood, vegetables from their<br />

gardens, water from springs, land rentals and a host <strong>of</strong> other goods and services that constitute a large<br />

part <strong>of</strong> household consumption that are usually underestimated in their household income surveys<br />

There are different livelihood activities in the forests that the people are engaged in. Many forest dwellers<br />

do kaingin (swidden) and plant agricultural crops in areas they occupy. They gather and utilize forest<br />

products for household consumption. There is not much issue about this as this is allowed especially<br />

for the indigenous peoples but, legally, the gathering <strong>of</strong> any forest product without authorization from<br />

the government is a punishable act (PD 705). Some also have ventured in illegal commercial forest<br />

products extraction for sale. The common products that are gathered and sold commercially whether<br />

legally or illegally include timber, rattan, bamboo, resins, honey, fuelwood, and charcoal. Many upland<br />

community members also process some raw materials in<strong>to</strong> handicrafts, novelty and decorative items<br />

and semi-finished products <strong>to</strong> get higher value.<br />

Deforestation and poverty<br />

Deforestation is the process <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> natural forest vegetation and eventual conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

originally forested areas in<strong>to</strong> non-forest uses. One <strong>of</strong> the major drivers <strong>of</strong> deforestation is forest<br />

conversion <strong>to</strong> upland agriculture. Forests have been cut down <strong>to</strong> clear lands for growing agricultural<br />

crops. In 1996, FAO estimated that 60-70% <strong>of</strong> tropical forest conversion was due <strong>to</strong> permanent or shortfallow<br />

agriculture (Tenorio 1999 as cited by Bugayong and Peralta 2006). The study by Fernandez et.<br />

al. on the status <strong>of</strong> cancelled and expired TLAs found that in 27 out <strong>of</strong> 32 cancelled or expired TLAs<br />

surveyed, these areas were destroyed in varying degrees 5 <strong>to</strong> 10 years after cancellation or expiration.<br />

Apparently, the displaced workers and adjacent community members moved in <strong>to</strong> the “open access”<br />

forest areas and occupied them for farming.<br />

Logging is also a primary driver <strong>of</strong> deforestation in an indirect way. In Balangue’s study (1991) 15% <strong>of</strong><br />

dipterocarp forests in the country was permanently lost due <strong>to</strong> peripheral logging activities, particularly,<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> forest areas for road building, logging camps, settlements <strong>of</strong> workers and cultivation <strong>of</strong> some<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the forests for the production <strong>of</strong> food for these workers and their dependents. Moreover, logging<br />

also contributed much <strong>to</strong> subsequent destruction <strong>of</strong> second growth forests as it provided access <strong>to</strong> forests<br />

and brought along plenty <strong>of</strong> people in their operations. When logging s<strong>to</strong>pped, many <strong>of</strong> the workers and<br />

their relatives opened up and converted forest lands in<strong>to</strong> agricultural and agr<strong>of</strong>orestry farms.<br />

Mining for mineral resources entails clearing <strong>of</strong> forests (mostly culled forests where soil is lateritic) and<br />

thus adds <strong>to</strong> the problems <strong>of</strong> deforestation. Coal mining, for example, entails stripping <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>psoil <strong>to</strong><br />

recover the minerals beneath. This happened in the Bagacay mines in Samar where large tracts <strong>of</strong> forest<br />

areas have been left deforested until now, long after the mining opera<strong>to</strong>rs left the area. This caused<br />

suffering <strong>to</strong> communities downstream as they lost some <strong>of</strong> their livelihood sources that are dependent<br />

on the river.<br />

In some grazing practices, forests are cut down and burned <strong>to</strong> create land for grazing cattle. Once<br />

burning is repeatedly done, the sturdiest grass (Imperata sp) invades the area, which regressively<br />

becomes the climax vegetation.<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> deforestation is now felt adversely in many areas. Coupled with erratic rainfall patterns<br />

in some areas where in a few hours the volume <strong>of</strong> rainfall exceeds normal levels, mountain slips,<br />

landslides, flash floods, and massive soil erosion are now common occurrences in many upland areas.<br />

These calamities continue <strong>to</strong> occur resulting in un<strong>to</strong>ld miseries and sufferings <strong>to</strong> people, further<br />

aggravating the massive poverty in the countryside and perpetuating the never-ending cycle <strong>of</strong> poverty<br />

and environmental degradation.<br />

270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!