26.02.2013 Views

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was not degraded forest but that it had become a fertile forest because <strong>of</strong> the villagers’ efforts. In<br />

making their stand, the villagers managed <strong>to</strong> claim their right over the forest. However, it was not <strong>to</strong><br />

be a long-lasting vic<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

During the 1980s and under the Chartchai government, there was widespread land speculation<br />

accompanied by increases in the number <strong>of</strong> land disputes. The state attempted <strong>to</strong> declare the surrounding<br />

forest around Thung Yao “Park Reserve” in 1989, but was met with huge resistance by the people<br />

despite the <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> a support fund <strong>of</strong> US$ 2,666 per year. The villagers’ perception was that if the<br />

forest was turned in<strong>to</strong> a park reserve, they would be denied access <strong>to</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the forest and would be<br />

required <strong>to</strong> comply with the rules and regulations <strong>of</strong> national government. It was this fear that losing the<br />

forest would mean losing their capacity <strong>to</strong> decide over their forest resources that motivated the women<br />

<strong>of</strong> Thung Yao in<strong>to</strong> making a stand, as some <strong>of</strong> them recounted:<br />

“That day the women <strong>of</strong> Ban Thung were gathered in the meeting, we shouted, ‘We are not<br />

giving up the forest because if we give up the forest, we will no longer have any food. We are<br />

satisfied as we are. We don’t want money from <strong>to</strong>urism. If this area becomes a Park Reserve<br />

where would we get our bamboo, mushrooms, and ants’ eggs? Take your 80,000 Baht and go<br />

and develop somewhere else. This forest is ours and we will protect it ourselves.’”<br />

“If we had left it <strong>to</strong> the men leaders, they would have given up the forest when the <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

asked. But we women will not give up. So we became the main leaders ourselves. If we had<br />

not done that, we would not have our source <strong>of</strong> food supply <strong>to</strong>day because the land would<br />

have all been converted <strong>to</strong> a park reserve.”<br />

The women <strong>of</strong> Ban Thung Yao knew that they needed concrete pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong> show how important the forest<br />

resources are <strong>to</strong> their basic livelihood. To protect their forest, they needed <strong>to</strong> make outsiders understand<br />

its benefits, so they set out collecting data. “With 5,000 Baht, we bought books and pencils and we<br />

recorded every kind <strong>of</strong> food that we collected from the forest.”<br />

The women collected data for one year and found that there were more than 28 types <strong>of</strong> vegetables, 25<br />

types <strong>of</strong> mushrooms, 13 kinds <strong>of</strong> fruits, and more than 20 herbs. More important, when converted in<strong>to</strong><br />

Mrs.Phakee Wannasak (left), the village head, and Mrs Rawiwan Kanchaisak (right) are among the women in the village<br />

who actively gave voice <strong>to</strong> their community’s aspiration <strong>to</strong> retain their ownership <strong>of</strong> – and management rights (including<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mary rights) <strong>to</strong> – their forest.<br />

310<br />

Orapan Nabangchang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!