26.02.2013 Views

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

labor. The respondents with the lowest incomes among the group <strong>of</strong> respondents, who also have the<br />

least landholdings and lives<strong>to</strong>ck, depend on pipla the most <strong>to</strong> generate cash income for their needs. The<br />

farmers in this group also depend on remittances they get from family members who have left their<br />

villages <strong>to</strong> work elsewhere.<br />

Although pipla is a major source <strong>of</strong> income for the farmers, they also engaged in lives<strong>to</strong>ck raising, and<br />

only one-third <strong>of</strong> the respondents belonging <strong>to</strong> the high- and medium-income categories expressed<br />

willingness <strong>to</strong> grow and register pipla in their own land. These are the farmers who own lands,<br />

although the land holdings <strong>of</strong> the middle-income farmers are mostly tsheri and mostly located far<br />

from the villages. The low-income farmers derive the highest share <strong>of</strong> income from pipla but own<br />

limited lands.<br />

Challenges in improving the contribution <strong>of</strong> pipla<br />

Most farmers recognize the need <strong>to</strong> improve their capacities in collecting, processing, and marketing<br />

pipla so that they can maximize their pr<strong>of</strong>it and sustain their resource base. Of these three areas <strong>of</strong><br />

limitations in pipla production, one-half <strong>of</strong> the respondents identified their current unsustainable and<br />

unorganized collection practices as the main drawback, while one-third identified marketing challenges,<br />

and the rest, limited processing skills.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the farmers see the need <strong>to</strong> establish community rules on proper collection practices for<br />

more organized and sustainable harvesting <strong>of</strong> pipla. Because pipla has a high commercial value in the<br />

market, farmers tend <strong>to</strong> compete among themselves in collecting pipla berries. Ideally, pipla should be<br />

collected when the berries mature, but there are farmers who want <strong>to</strong> pick ahead <strong>of</strong> the others, even if<br />

the berries are still premature. Some farmers uproot the plant, putting <strong>to</strong> waste the small berries. The<br />

DoFPS developed guidelines for the proper harvesting <strong>of</strong> pipla, which the farmers need <strong>to</strong> collectively<br />

adopt and commit <strong>to</strong> follow.<br />

The farmers are also concerned about marketing as the current practice is not organized and does<br />

not fetch the most favorable price for the farmers. In the early 1990s, the relatively well-<strong>of</strong>f farmers<br />

at first were able <strong>to</strong> fetch higher prices than the poorer farmers because they did not involve the<br />

middlemen in selling their harvest. The farmers recalled that, in 1996, the prices improved for<br />

the poorer farmers as well with the entry <strong>of</strong> other middlemen from other places that allowed for<br />

competition in buying prices. Still, the poorer farmers tended <strong>to</strong> obtain lower cash income from<br />

pipla. Some <strong>of</strong> them bartered pipla with other products, such as rice and sheets <strong>of</strong> cloth, while others<br />

<strong>to</strong>ok advance payments from the middlemen; thus, they could not negotiate with the middlemen<br />

for higher prices. The market value <strong>of</strong> pipla could have been higher than the present price had the<br />

farmers not resorted <strong>to</strong> adulteration.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the low-income farmers are generally forced <strong>to</strong> sell their collection <strong>to</strong> the middlemen since<br />

they cannot afford <strong>to</strong> bring their produce <strong>to</strong> the distant market outlet and, in many cases, they already<br />

tie their future harvests <strong>to</strong> middlemen as payment for their cash advances. Sometimes the low-income<br />

famers cannot compete with high-income farmers in collecting pipla since the latter exert some control<br />

over the market. In some areas, pipla grows in tsheri and pasturelands owned by the other farmers and<br />

are not accessible <strong>to</strong> low-income farmers. Some <strong>of</strong> the poor farmers, however, collect pipla for the well<strong>of</strong>f<br />

farmers and are paid for their labor on a daily wage basis.<br />

Farmers process pipla berries by drying these under the sun. Direct sun-drying is done by spreading<br />

the pipla on the ground <strong>to</strong> maintain the quality. During continuous rain, pipla is oven-dried, which is<br />

a faster way <strong>to</strong> dry pipla than sun-drying. However, the smoke can cause the color <strong>of</strong> pipla <strong>to</strong> change,<br />

thereby reducing its quality. Sun drying is generally preferred <strong>to</strong> oven-drying since it is cheaper and<br />

less laborious as it does not require fuelwood. Poor farmers <strong>of</strong>ten s<strong>to</strong>re their pipla collection for a few<br />

weeks until it is sold <strong>to</strong> the middlemen. Some better-<strong>of</strong>f farmers can s<strong>to</strong>re their collected pipla for as<br />

long as one year while waiting for favorable prices.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!