26.02.2013 Views

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From 2003-04 until 2004-05, revenue generated from the sale <strong>of</strong> wood products <strong>to</strong> rural residents was<br />

slightly higher than revenue from wood products sold <strong>to</strong> urban residents (Table I.2). However, in 2005-<br />

06 and 2006-07, the revenue from the supply <strong>of</strong> wood products <strong>to</strong> urban users was around 60% and<br />

92%, respectively, while revenue from the supply <strong>of</strong> wood products <strong>to</strong> rural users was about 17% and<br />

8%, respectively. Although demand is higher in rural areas, more revenue is being generated from the<br />

sale <strong>of</strong> wood products <strong>to</strong> the urban consumers. This is because, at a subsidized rate, rural residents can<br />

buy timber at a much lower price than the amount urban residents pay for the same amount <strong>of</strong> timber.<br />

The <strong>to</strong>tal government revenue generated from supply <strong>of</strong> wood and wood products <strong>to</strong> rural and urban<br />

consumers from 2003-04 <strong>to</strong> 2006-07 amounted <strong>to</strong> Nu 85.93 million, which went <strong>to</strong> the government<br />

exchequer.<br />

Table I.2. Revenue generated (Nu. in million) from supply <strong>of</strong> wood products.<br />

User Year<br />

2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007<br />

Rural 3.98 3.75 4.57 2.33<br />

Urban 0.46 2.22 17.43 27<br />

Monasteries 0.28 1.65 0.11 -<br />

Government<br />

institutions<br />

7.61 8.39 6.15 -<br />

Total 12.33 16.01 28.26 29.33<br />

Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Forests.<br />

Government plantations<br />

Commercial plantations in Bhutan date back <strong>to</strong> 1947 with the establishment <strong>of</strong> plantations along the<br />

sub-tropical foothills <strong>of</strong> Bhutan. Clear-felling followed by artificial planting <strong>of</strong> exotic and local species,<br />

such as teak (Tec<strong>to</strong>na grandis), sal (Shorea robusta), champ (Michelia champaca), and other valuable<br />

species, was practiced. Since the 1960s, the plantation program expanded <strong>to</strong> other parts <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

<strong>to</strong> reforest degraded, denuded, and barren areas and <strong>to</strong> arrest forest degradation and forest cover loss,<br />

particularly in sub-tropical zones where high human population and cattle population co-exist. A <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

<strong>of</strong> 21,516 ha have been planted as <strong>of</strong> June 2008.<br />

Although plantation has been an annual event throughout the first <strong>to</strong> the ninth FYP with the participation<br />

<strong>of</strong> government agencies and private and wood-based industries, progress has been slow. This is because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the country’s dependence on the natural forests, which supply the bulk <strong>of</strong> the forest resource demand,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> clear-cut plantation directions and strategy, lack <strong>of</strong> funding support, and other institutional gaps.<br />

Conifer and broadleaf plantations constitute about 2% <strong>of</strong> Bhutan’s <strong>to</strong>tal forests cover. Rural people<br />

are employed on a daily wage basis as plantation laborers for planting in government land. Very little<br />

benefits are derived.<br />

Wood-based industries plantation<br />

Industrial and commercial forestry operations are carried out by a few wood-based industries such as<br />

the Bhutan Board Product Ltd. (BBPL), Natural Resources Development Corporation Ltd. (NRDCL)<br />

and Bhutan Chemical Carbide Ltd. (BCCL) for charcoal production. Out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal plantations planted<br />

by various agencies, commercial plantations <strong>of</strong> short rotation-high density forests account for only<br />

18.7%. As in government plantations, the rural poor are hired by the wood-based industry on a daily<br />

wage basis as workforce for planting, harvesting, wood processing, and marketing tasks. BBPL has<br />

two nurseries for supplying production and planting materials, NRDCL has 10 nurseries, while private<br />

individuals have 27 nurseries.<br />

The constraints faced by industrial forestry are unclear legislation and regulation on leasehold<br />

government reserve forests, limited forest resources, and the need for accommodation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!