Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet
Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet
Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Northern<br />
North-<br />
Eastern<br />
Lampang 2 3,609 577 116 522<br />
Phayao 1 1,868 299 191 651<br />
Tak 1 23,314 3,730 87 457<br />
Nan 51 241,927 38,708 6,466 24,345<br />
Total 65 296,580 47,453 9,071 34,631<br />
Chaiyaphume 1 1,775 284 103 541<br />
Ubonratchathai 4 5,170 827 183 833<br />
Nakornratchasima 1 14,000<br />
Burirum 2 24,246 3,879 1,170 2,022<br />
Khon Kaen 2 45,667 7,307 1,679 6,446<br />
Kalasin 2 156,850 25,096 1,635 15,175<br />
Total 12 247,708 39,633 4,770 25,017<br />
Trang 7 18,160 2,906 694 2,831<br />
Suratthani 3 10,011 1,602 845 2,070<br />
Southern Krabi 1 10 2 34 133<br />
Phuket 13 338 54 1,443 4,642<br />
Ranong 5 2,233 357 177 828<br />
Total 29 30,752 4,920 3,193 10,504<br />
Central Karnchanaburi 1 4,800 768 2,125 6,085<br />
What must be said <strong>of</strong> these requests is that whether or not they are approved depends on pre-determined<br />
criteria, on pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> management, and on agreement <strong>of</strong> the local communities <strong>to</strong> the conditions imposed.<br />
Without a continuity <strong>of</strong> policy and commitment from the decision makers, they could just end up being<br />
numbers. Nonetheless, there is room for optimism.<br />
One advantage this has over the stalemate in the Community <strong>Forestry</strong> Bill is that the process was already<br />
launched and is not caught up in two decades <strong>of</strong> debate. The other is that since local communities are<br />
positively responding <strong>to</strong> this policy (which is not surprising since there is much <strong>to</strong> be gained), any<br />
successive government is not likely <strong>to</strong> risk popularity by not continuing the policy. One area that should<br />
be <strong>of</strong> particular concern is an overly active pursuit <strong>of</strong> the policy <strong>to</strong> gain political popularity at the<br />
expense <strong>of</strong> appropriate and careful screening <strong>of</strong> applications, and will not augur well for the natural<br />
resources base <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
Commercial <strong>Forestry</strong> and Industrial <strong>Forestry</strong><br />
Commercial forestry and industrial forestry are part <strong>of</strong> the economic sec<strong>to</strong>r with high potential for<br />
employment and income generation. Thailand is both an importer and exporter <strong>of</strong> wood and woodbased<br />
products. The increased consumption <strong>of</strong> paper is probably one <strong>of</strong> the main drivers <strong>of</strong> demand<br />
for import <strong>of</strong> wood pulp and other types <strong>of</strong> fiber. In 2010, the value <strong>of</strong> import <strong>of</strong> was approximately<br />
16,490 million Baht. In the same year, the import value <strong>of</strong> paper and paper scraps combined was<br />
approximately 52,740 million Baht. Other main import products were processed wood (10,636 million<br />
Baht) and various types <strong>of</strong> plywood. For imported logs, the main supplier both in terms <strong>of</strong> quantity<br />
and value was Myanmar. Imports <strong>of</strong> processed wood on the other hand were mainly from Lao PDR<br />
followed by Malaysia.<br />
On the export side, the <strong>to</strong>p three most important export items in terms <strong>of</strong> value in 2010 were paper<br />
(42,235 million Baht), processed wood (18,145 million Baht) and wooden furniture (14,751 million<br />
Baht). By comparison, the value <strong>of</strong> log exports was much lower at only 16 million Baht. The value <strong>of</strong><br />
teak wood exports alone was around 76% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal exports, the rest coming from. The remaining<br />
wood exports were Para wood (rubberwood or wood from the Para rubber tree, Heveabrasiliensis),<br />
eucalyptus, and pinewood. Most <strong>of</strong> the exports <strong>of</strong> processed wood were Para wood. The export value<br />
<strong>of</strong> Para wood in 2010 was 17,154.5 million Baht equivalent <strong>to</strong> nearly 95% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal value <strong>of</strong> exports<br />
<strong>of</strong> processed wood from Thailand.<br />
In 2009, according <strong>to</strong> the RFD, there were 3,987 wood processing establishments. With the exception<br />
<strong>of</strong> a few that were producing wooden craft products, most <strong>of</strong> these establishments were machinerybased<br />
and capital-intensive. In addition, there were three paper pulp fac<strong>to</strong>ries. Through the support <strong>of</strong><br />
the Forest Industry Organization (FIO), a key public sec<strong>to</strong>r agency, the areas where trees were planted<br />
305