26.02.2013 Views

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

Contribution of Forestry to Poverty Alleviation - APFNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A hanging foot bridge constructed using income generated by a CFUG<br />

exercise exclusive rights <strong>to</strong> use and manage these forests and strictly prohibit outsiders from access,<br />

though there is no legal base for said prohibition.<br />

There are many such forests particularly in the hills above 1,500 masl where control and management<br />

<strong>of</strong> forests by the DOF is weak. A study conducted in the mountains <strong>of</strong> Nepal in 2003 showed that<br />

there were four traditionally managed forests with 26 households each in hills above 1,500 masl<br />

and two traditionally managed forests with 65 households each in the lower elevation zone (below<br />

1,500 masl) in three village development committee areas (Pandit 2003). On average, each VDC<br />

in the middle hills <strong>of</strong> Nepal has one such traditional forest. The proportion <strong>of</strong> traditional forests <strong>to</strong><br />

community forests in the upper elevation was estimated at more than 10% and in the lower elevation,<br />

which cover almost 5% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal forest area. Comparing this figure <strong>to</strong> the national average <strong>of</strong><br />

community forests, there are 1,125 traditional forests managed by local communities without DFO<br />

intervention (Ibid.). Only those claiming such forests have the rights <strong>to</strong> use and manage these forests.<br />

As users are not concerned about the conservation <strong>of</strong> forest resources, the members <strong>of</strong> the households<br />

have free access <strong>to</strong> the resources and may collect as much as they can. Therefore, forest degradation<br />

is relatively higher compared <strong>to</strong> that in community forests (Ibid.). The contribution <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

forests <strong>to</strong> the household economy cannot be directly interpreted because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> data, but local<br />

people are able <strong>to</strong> meet their subsistence needs.<br />

Allocation <strong>of</strong> tenure over forest resources<br />

Many agencies and projects in Nepal are involved in supporting CFs and LFs for the sustainable use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> forest resources and achievement <strong>of</strong> the GoN’s poverty reduction goals, which are<br />

consistent with the MDGs. These include the Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong> United Nations,<br />

Nepal Swiss Community <strong>Forestry</strong> Project, Livelihood and <strong>Forestry</strong> Program <strong>of</strong> UK Department <strong>of</strong><br />

International Development, Leasehold <strong>Forestry</strong> and Lives<strong>to</strong>ck Program <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> Nepal,<br />

and Western Upland <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> Program.<br />

The government implemented the Hills Leasehold <strong>Forestry</strong> and Forage Development Project (HLFFDP)<br />

from 1992 <strong>to</strong> 2003 in 10 districts <strong>of</strong> the country, with funding support from the International Fund<br />

215<br />

Bishnu Hari Pandit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!