29.03.2013 Views

The life of George Stephenson, railway engineer - Lighthouse ...

The life of George Stephenson, railway engineer - Lighthouse ...

The life of George Stephenson, railway engineer - Lighthouse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAP, xvm.] ARTICLE IN THE "QUARTERLY." 207<br />

<strong>George</strong> <strong>Stephenson</strong>'s idea was indeed at that time regarded<br />

as but the dream <strong>of</strong> a chimerical projector. It stood before the<br />

public friendless, struggling hard to gain a footing, but scarcely<br />

daring to lift itself into notice for fear <strong>of</strong> ridicule. <strong>The</strong> civil<br />

<strong>engineer</strong>s generally rejected the notion <strong>of</strong> a Locomotive Railway<br />

; and when no leading man <strong>of</strong> the day could be found to<br />

stand forward in support <strong>of</strong> the Killingworth mechanic, its<br />

chances <strong>of</strong> success must have been pronounced small. But,<br />

like all great truths, the time was surely to come when it was to<br />

prevail.<br />

When such was the hostility <strong>of</strong> the civil <strong>engineer</strong>s, no wonder<br />

the reviewers were puzzled. <strong>The</strong> Quarterly,* in an able article<br />

in support <strong>of</strong> the projected Liverpool and Manchester Railway,<br />

—while admitting its absolute necessity, and insisting that there<br />

was no choice left but a railroad, on which the journey between<br />

Liverpool and Manchester, whether performed by horses or<br />

engines, would always be accomplished " within- the day,"<br />

nevertheless scouted the idea <strong>of</strong> travelling at a greater speed<br />

than eight or nine miles an hour. " We are not the advocates,"<br />

said the reviewer, "for visionary projects that interfere with<br />

useful establishments; we scout the idea <strong>of</strong> a general raxlToaA as<br />

altogether impracticable, or as one, at least, which will be ren-<br />

dered nugatory in lines, where the traffic is so small that the receipts<br />

would scarcely pay for the consumption <strong>of</strong> coals. . . . <strong>The</strong><br />

gross exaggerations <strong>of</strong> the powers <strong>of</strong> the locomotive engine, or,<br />

to speak in plain English, the steam-carriage, may delude for a<br />

time, but must end in the mortification <strong>of</strong> those concerned."<br />

Adverting to a project for forming a <strong>railway</strong> to Woolwich, by<br />

which passengers were to be drawn by locomotive engines,<br />

moving with twice the velocity and with greater safety than<br />

ordinary coaches, the reviewer proceeded :— " What can be more<br />

plans for speedy oommunioation, were treated as chimerical; and he recol-<br />

lected a conversation he had had with Mr. <strong>George</strong> <strong>Stephenson</strong>, which, although<br />

perhaps that gentleman had forgotten it, he (Mr. Biddulph) had not. Mr. <strong>Stephenson</strong><br />

on that occasion ohserved, ' Whatever may be said <strong>of</strong> horses or dogs<br />

racing, what comparison could there be between that and seeing an engine<br />

flying across. the country with more than a hundred people in its train, at a far<br />

greater speed than either the fleetest horses or dogs could run? '<br />

* Quarterly Review, for March, 1825.<br />

"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!