29.03.2013 Views

The life of George Stephenson, railway engineer - Lighthouse ...

The life of George Stephenson, railway engineer - Lighthouse ...

The life of George Stephenson, railway engineer - Lighthouse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

390 LIFE OF GEORGE STEPHENSON. [chap. xxxi.<br />

peditious worhing, than others which have nothing steeper than<br />

1 in 100 or 1 in 120 ! " <strong>The</strong>y concluded by reporting in favour<br />

<strong>of</strong> the line which exhibited the most gradients and the sharpest<br />

curves, chiefly on the ground that it could be constructed for less<br />

money.<br />

Sir Eobert Peel took occasion, when speaking in favour <strong>of</strong> the<br />

continuance <strong>of</strong> the Railways Department <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Trade,<br />

to advert to this Report in the House <strong>of</strong> Commons on the 4th<br />

<strong>of</strong> March following, as containing " a novel and highly important<br />

view on the subject <strong>of</strong> gradients, which, he was certain, never<br />

could have been taken by any Committee <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Com-<br />

mons, however intelligent ;<br />

" and he might have added, that the<br />

more intelligent, the less likely they were to arrive at any such<br />

conclusions. When Mr. <strong>Stephenson</strong> saw this report <strong>of</strong> the<br />

premier's speech in the newspapers <strong>of</strong> the following morning,<br />

he went forthwith to his son, and asked him to write a letter<br />

to Sir Robert Peel on the subject. He saw clearly that if these<br />

views were adopted, the utility and economy <strong>of</strong> <strong>railway</strong>s would<br />

be seriously curtailed. " <strong>The</strong>se members <strong>of</strong> parliament," said he,<br />

" are now as much disposed to exaggerate the powers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

locomotive, as they were to under-estimate them but a few years<br />

ago." Mr. Robert <strong>Stephenson</strong> wrote a letter for his father's<br />

signature, embodying the views which he so strongly entertained<br />

as to the importance <strong>of</strong> flat gradients, and referring to the ex-<br />

periments conducted by him many years before, in pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

great loss <strong>of</strong> working power which was incurred on a line <strong>of</strong><br />

steep as compared with easy gradients. It was clear, from the<br />

tone <strong>of</strong> Sir Robert Peel's speech in a subsequent debate,* that<br />

he had carefully read and considered Mr. <strong>Stephenson</strong>'s practical<br />

observations on the subject ; for he then took the opportunity <strong>of</strong><br />

observing that »" he thought there was too great a tendency to'<br />

adopt the shortest lines, without reference to gradients. Though,<br />

in recent instances, unfavourable gradients had been overcome<br />

by the construction <strong>of</strong> new engines, he doubted whether there<br />

was not an unpr<strong>of</strong>itable expenditure <strong>of</strong> power in such cases,<br />

whether the mechanical action <strong>of</strong> locomotive engines was not<br />

materially interfered with by unfavourable gradients,— and<br />

* Debate on Mr. Morison's resolutions, March 20th, 1845.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!