- Page 1 and 2:
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Functiona
- Page 3:
Many figures in this thesis use col
- Page 6 and 7:
ACKNOWLEûGEM ENTS Many friends and
- Page 8 and 9:
Approval page Acknowledgements Tabi
- Page 10 and 11:
CONCLUDING COMMENTS Figures for Cha
- Page 12 and 13:
CHAPTER 5: Mechanical and phylogene
- Page 14 and 15:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 .l. Phylog
- Page 16 and 17:
Figure 3.6. Osteological correlates
- Page 18 and 19:
AMNH GI HMN IVPP MOR NMC OMNH PIN P
- Page 20 and 21:
and constructional morphology revea
- Page 22 and 23:
1985, Bryant and Seymour 1990). If
- Page 24 and 25:
surfaces of a Tyrannosaurus rex spe
- Page 26 and 27:
3. Troodontidae (Figure 1.2): Trwdo
- Page 29 and 30:
Hypothesized functions of the tyran
- Page 31 and 32:
1. Atomization (Chapters 2 and 3).
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 1.1. P hylogenetic diagram o
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 1.2. Phylogenetic diagram of
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 1.3. Phylogenetic diagram of
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 1.4. Phylogenetic diagram of
- Page 41:
Figure 1 .S. Skeletal restorations
- Page 44 and 45:
did not quantify the degree of prox
- Page 46 and 47:
qualitative debate over arctometata
- Page 48 and 49:
This hypothesis focuses on tyrannos
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.1. Theropod and Plafeosauru
- Page 52 and 53:
specimens in the figures reflects a
- Page 54 and 55:
were not attempted. While this limi
- Page 56 and 57:
Chapter 3). 1 now address variation
- Page 58 and 59:
- Ç6'P 1 68'€tr 1 L'OC 99'66 L'9
- Page 60 and 61:
Table 2.3: Log-transformed values f
- Page 62 and 63:
experiences a sharp laterally indin
- Page 64 and 65:
ecause it can be cursorily dassifie
- Page 66 and 67:
arctometatarsalian specimens, the l
- Page 68 and 69:
) Shaf€ and region of proximal ar
- Page 70 and 71:
a) Ginglymus. Figure 2.14 shows the
- Page 72 and 73:
) Shaft and region of proximal arti
- Page 74 and 75:
measurements of width pV2S%TU-DE an
- Page 76 and 77:
Table 2.4b Variancelmeasurement eac
- Page 78 and 79:
the largest sum of linear measureme
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 2.5: Specimen statistics Herr
- Page 82 and 83:
and Sinraptor dongi specimens. With
- Page 84 and 85:
In addition, a hook like proximal a
- Page 86 and 87:
oth physical narrowing and elongati
- Page 88 and 89:
1s the MT 111 shape segregation fun
- Page 90 and 91:
tyrannosaurids, ornithomimid, and t
- Page 92 and 93:
proximal constriction, white EImisa
- Page 95:
Figure 2.2. Tyrannosaurid, trwdonti
- Page 99:
Figure 2.4. Dromaeosaurid and carno
- Page 102 and 103:
- Anterior (flexor) surface medial
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 2.7. Left MT III of Tyrannos
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 2.8. Left MT III of Gorgosau
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 2.9. Left MT III of an omith
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 2.10. Left metatarsus of Tmd
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 2.1 1. Left MT III of Elmisa
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 2.12. Right MT III of Deinon
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 2.13. Left MT III of Allosau
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 2.14. Left metatarsus of Sin
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 2.15. Plots of MT Ill specir
- Page 123:
Figure 2.16. Plot of third metatars
- Page 126 and 127:
tv . ... . Ri. . . .
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 2.19. Plot of third metatars
- Page 131 and 132:
CHAPTER 3: Tensile keystone model o
- Page 133 and 134:
dynamically transmitted Iommotor fo
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 3.1 . Metatarsi examined in t
- Page 137 and 138:
interrnetatarsal dynamics in these
- Page 139 and 140: compelled analysis of movement evid
- Page 141 and 142: Once prepared, TMP 94.1 2.602 and i
- Page 143 and 144: Daspletosaurus tomsus (MOR 590), an
- Page 145 and 146: 2. Freedom of movement inferred fro
- Page 147 and 148: Table 3.2. Surface areas of intemet
- Page 149 and 150: phylogenetic bracketing Wtmer 1995)
- Page 151 and 152: 4) Forces from anterior displacerne
- Page 153 and 154: e expected for tyrannosaurid interm
- Page 155 and 156: The preceding discussion derives fr
- Page 157 and 158: weapons sparring), and the arctomet
- Page 159: Figure 3.1. Schematic representatio
- Page 163: Figure 3.3. CT reconstruction of ri
- Page 167: Figure 3.5. MT II (left element) an
- Page 171: Figure 3.7. Osteological correlates
- Page 175: Figure 3.9. Osteological correlates
- Page 179: Figure 3.1 1 ae. The metatarsal rec
- Page 187: Figure 3.13. Ligament contribution
- Page 192 and 193: Lu- dorsal 81igarnents
- Page 195 and 196: CHAPTER 4: Finite element model of
- Page 197 and 198: forces are applied to nodes on the
- Page 199 and 200: Material and Ioading regimes of fhe
- Page 201 and 202: Two analyses were fun in order to t
- Page 203 and 204: Dunng Iinear progression when an an
- Page 205 and 206: This quantity approximates the vert
- Page 207 and 208: to its right foot to prepare for a
- Page 209 and 210: elements in the finite element rnes
- Page 211 and 212: Table 4.1. Material properties of b
- Page 213 and 214: Photoshop 3 for Macintosh, to ensur
- Page 215 and 216: this program. NUAGES typically foun
- Page 217 and 218: 1) Informative strain results versu
- Page 219 and 220: of strain energy evident in Figure
- Page 221 and 222: Specifically, osteological correlat
- Page 223 and 224: custiioned the rnetatarsals against
- Page 226: Figure 4.2. Initial loads and bound
- Page 230: Figure 4.4. Simplified representati
- Page 234: Figure 4.6. Strain distribution in
- Page 237 and 238: The analyses of the Gorgosaurus Iib
- Page 239 and 240: individual organs with ideally effi
- Page 241 and 242:
These considerations of ligament mo
- Page 243 and 244:
The precise scaling of metatarsal l
- Page 245 and 246:
tenable from the available evidence
- Page 247 and 248:
equivalent horsepower, 15 economy c
- Page 249 and 250:
Other aptations refiect multiple fu
- Page 251 and 252:
This and other systernatically info
- Page 253 and 254:
(Russell 1975, McGregor 2000). Meta
- Page 255 and 256:
was the default developmental patte
- Page 257 and 258:
Arnong dromaeosaurids and birds, th
- Page 259 and 260:
hypothesis. Fossil evidence of basa
- Page 261 and 262:
suggestive of grasping ability. Neo
- Page 263 and 264:
available evidence without propriet
- Page 265:
Figure 5.1. Phylogeny of the Therop
- Page 269:
Figure 5.3. Phylogeny of the Therop
- Page 273:
Figure 5.5. Phylogeny of the Therop
- Page 277 and 278:
LITERTURE ClTED Alexander R.M. 1977
- Page 279 and 280:
Carter D.R., Fyhrie, D.P., and Whal
- Page 281 and 282:
Galton P.M. 1982. Elaphrosaurus, an
- Page 283 and 284:
Hutchinson J.R., Stidham T.A., Sniv
- Page 285 and 286:
Novas F.E. 1993. New information on
- Page 287 and 288:
Stein B.R. and Casinos 1997. What i
- Page 289 and 290:
APPENDIX Principal Components Analy
- Page 291:
highest degree, and so on. Specimen