03.04.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12<br />

Status of Names in the Officiai List of Family-<br />

Group Names in Zoology<br />

A number of family-group names have been<br />

placed on the Official List by the Commission<br />

of Nomenclature. The Code rules that: "The<br />

status of a name entered in an Official List is<br />

subject to the ruling(s) in any relevant<br />

Opinion(s) [...]; all other aspects of its status<br />

derive from the normal application of the Code"<br />

(Art. 80.6.2) and also that: "A name may be<br />

placed in an Official List without any additional<br />

qualification" (Art. 80.6.3).<br />

We have found a number of instances in<br />

which the authorship and/or date of publication<br />

of a name entered on the Official List are<br />

erroneous, that is that name has been estab-<br />

lished earlier by the same or another author.<br />

For convenience, the corrections were published<br />

in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomencla-<br />

ture (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2001), but they did<br />

not require any action from the Commission.<br />

Since then, we have discovered another such<br />

erroneous entry: Opinion 1470 placed the<br />

name Eugmphalidae on the Official List and<br />

attributed it to de Koninck, 1 881 ,<br />

in fact first established by White, 1 877.<br />

when<br />

BOUCHET&ROCROI<br />

it was<br />

Cases to be Submitted to the Commission<br />

Inevitably, a review of family-group names<br />

such as the present one has made apparent a<br />

All names<br />

2396<br />

available 2060<br />

not available 336<br />

number of nomenclatural cases that cannot<br />

be solved without a decision of the Commission.<br />

The problems are simply discussed under<br />

the appropriate headings in the<br />

Nomenclátor or in the Appendices. It was felt<br />

inappropriate to prepare applications for publication<br />

in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature<br />

before publication of the present work:<br />

first, because it is precisely the purpose of the<br />

present work to highlight the problems, elicit<br />

discussion and seek a consensus among<br />

malacologists; second, because it is not pos-<br />

sible to monopolize several issues of the Bul-<br />

letin of Zoological Nomenclature just to deal<br />

with the many cases involved. A solution to all<br />

these problems will probably take several<br />

years. Ultimately, the present Nomenclátor<br />

could, after amendments, become a Part of<br />

the List of Available Names in Zoology, as<br />

regulated by Article 79 of the Code.<br />

Nomenclátor<br />

Epidemiology of Gastropod Family-Group<br />

Names<br />

A total of 2,396 names at the rank of subtribe,<br />

tribe, subfamily, family, and superfamily have<br />

been proposed for Recent and fossil gastropods,<br />

or have, at one time or another, been<br />

used at these ranks. Of these, 336 are not<br />

available names, mainly because they are not<br />

potentially valid<br />

1947<br />

invalid 113<br />

611<br />

taxonomically valid<br />

at family rank<br />

1336<br />

synonyms or used<br />

at subfamily/tribe<br />

FIG. 1. How the nomenclatural and taxonomical filters operate on the 2,396 names established or<br />

used for gastropod families, subfamilies, tribes, or subtribes.<br />

rank

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!