07.04.2013 Views

PUBLIC OPINION by WALTER LIPPMANN TO FAYE LIPPMANN ...

PUBLIC OPINION by WALTER LIPPMANN TO FAYE LIPPMANN ...

PUBLIC OPINION by WALTER LIPPMANN TO FAYE LIPPMANN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stability and prosperity. We should be ready to aid her in binding up<br />

her wounds, in relieving her from starvation and distress, in giving<br />

her in every practicable way the benefits of our disinterested<br />

friendship. The conduct of this administration has created<br />

difficulties which we shall have to surmount.... _We shall have to<br />

adopt a new policy,_ a policy of _firmness_ and consistency<br />

through which alone we can promote an enduring _friendship._"<br />

The theme friendship is for the non-interventionists, the theme "new<br />

policy" and "firmness" is for the interventionists. On the<br />

non-contentious record, the detail is overwhelming; on the issue<br />

everything is cloudy.<br />

Concerning the European war Mr. Hughes employed an ingenious formula:<br />

"I stand for the unflinching maintenance of _all_ American rights<br />

on land and sea."<br />

In order to understand the force of that statement at the time it was<br />

spoken, we must remember how each faction during the period of<br />

neutrality believed that the nations it opposed in Europe were alone<br />

violating American rights. Mr. Hughes seemed to say to the pro-Allies:<br />

I would have coerced Germany. But the pro-Germans had been insisting<br />

that British sea power was violating most of our rights. The formula<br />

covers two diametrically opposed purposes <strong>by</strong> the symbolic phrase<br />

"American rights."<br />

But there was the Lusitania. Like the 1912 schism, it was an<br />

invincible obstacle to harmony.<br />

"... I am confident that there would have been no destruction of<br />

American lives <strong>by</strong> the sinking of the Lusitania."<br />

Thus, what cannot be compromised must be obliterated, when there is a<br />

question on which we cannot all hope to get together, let us pretend<br />

that it does not exist. About the future of American relations with<br />

Europe Mr. Hughes was silent. Nothing he could say would possibly<br />

please the two irreconcilable factions for whose support he was<br />

bidding.<br />

It is hardly necessary to say that Mr. Hughes did not invent this<br />

technic and did not employ it with the utmost success. But he<br />

illustrated how a public opinion constituted out of divergent opinions<br />

is clouded; how its meaning approaches the neutral tint formed out of<br />

the blending of many colors. Where superficial harmony is the aim and<br />

conflict the fact, obscurantism in a public appeal is the usual<br />

result. Almost always vagueness at a crucial point in public debate is<br />

a symptom of cross-purposes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!