07.04.2013 Views

PUBLIC OPINION by WALTER LIPPMANN TO FAYE LIPPMANN ...

PUBLIC OPINION by WALTER LIPPMANN TO FAYE LIPPMANN ...

PUBLIC OPINION by WALTER LIPPMANN TO FAYE LIPPMANN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lumber, hire carpenters, or construct brick walls they need not<br />

necessarily do them through the same agency, for that might mean<br />

cumbersome over-centralization; but they would be able to use the same<br />

measure for the same things, be conscious of the comparisons, and be<br />

treated as competitors. And the more competition of this sort the<br />

better.<br />

For the value of competition is determined <strong>by</strong> the value of the<br />

standards used to measure it. Instead, then, of asking ourselves<br />

whether we believe in competition, we should ask ourselves whether we<br />

believe in that for which the competitors compete. No one in his<br />

senses expects to "abolish competition," for when the last vestige of<br />

emulation had disappeared, social effort would consist in mechanical<br />

obedience to a routine, tempered in a minority <strong>by</strong> native inspiration.<br />

Yet no one expects to work out competition to its logical conclusion<br />

in a murderous struggle of each against all. The problem is to select<br />

the goals of competition and the rules of the game. Almost always the<br />

most visible and obvious standard of measurement will determine the<br />

rules of the game: such as money, power, popularity, applause, or Mr.<br />

Veblen's "conspicuous waste." What other standards of measurement does<br />

our civilization normally provide? How does it measure efficiency,<br />

productivity, service, for which we are always clamoring?<br />

By and large there are no measures, and there is, therefore, not so<br />

much competition to achieve these ideals. For the difference between<br />

the higher and the lower motives is not, as men often assert, a<br />

difference between altruism and selfishness. [Footnote: _Cf._<br />

Ch. XII] It is a difference between acting for easily understood aims,<br />

and for aims that are obscure and vague. Exhort a man to make more<br />

profit than his neighbor, and he knows at what to aim. Exhort him to<br />

render more social service, and how is he to be certain what service<br />

is social? What is the test, what is the measure? A subjective<br />

feeling, somebody's opinion. Tell a man in time of peace that he ought<br />

to serve his country and you have uttered a pious platitude, Tell him<br />

in time of war, and the word service has a meaning; it is a number of<br />

concrete acts, enlistment, or buying bonds, or saving food, or working<br />

for a dollar a year, and each one of these services he sees definitely<br />

as part of a concrete purpose to put at the front an army larger and<br />

better armed, than the enemy's.<br />

So the more you are able to analyze administration and work out<br />

elements that can be compared, the more you invent quantitative<br />

measures for the qualities you wish to promote, the more you can turn<br />

competition to ideal ends. If you can contrive the right index numbers<br />

[Footnote: I am not using the term index numbers in its purely<br />

technical meaning, but to cover any device for the comparative<br />

measurement of social phenomena.] you can set up a competition between<br />

individual workers in a shop; between shops; between factories;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!