- Page 1 and 2:
Report No. BDK75 977-04 Date: Augus
- Page 3 and 4:
Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN
- Page 5 and 6:
ALTERNATIVE SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR CAN
- Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the 2004 h
- Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODU
- Page 11 and 12:
Torsion Test Data .................
- Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure page Figure
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure 4-15. Arrangement of the LVD
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This project
- Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND The following
- Page 21 and 22:
information obtained in the late 19
- Page 23 and 24:
these problems. The concern with fa
- Page 25 and 26:
opposite side, see Figure 2-2 The s
- Page 27 and 28:
2.2.4 Helical Pipes This option wou
- Page 29 and 30:
2.3 Alternative Foundations from Ot
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-10. Drilled concrete piles
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2-13. Grouted soil anchors G
- Page 35 and 36:
The pad and pier foundation, found
- Page 37 and 38:
comments and recommendations on pre
- Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 3 DESIGN IMPLICATIONS Based
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 3-2. Differences between con
- Page 43 and 44:
2 [ ] 2 2 ( r ) + 3. 25 ( r ) − (
- Page 45 and 46:
eakout surface for a single plate,
- Page 47 and 48:
strength of a headed anchor in tens
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 3-9. Schematic of anticipate
- Page 51 and 52:
Vbfp l e tfp bfp f’c ca1 = the ba
- Page 53 and 54:
3.2.2 Equivalent Side-Face Blowout
- Page 55 and 56:
computed. See Equation 3-14 below t
- Page 57 and 58:
One method to quantify the failure
- Page 59 and 60:
• An additional 12-4.5” long, 1
- Page 61 and 62:
Applied load Lever arm Figure 4-4.
- Page 63 and 64:
Figure 4-8. Isometric view of embed
- Page 65 and 66:
Flexural plate breakout area Torsio
- Page 67 and 68:
4.2.4 Annular Base Plate Design The
- Page 69 and 70:
torsional strength of the lever arm
- Page 71 and 72:
4.4 Concrete Block and Tie-Down Des
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 4-13. Arrangement of the LVD
- Page 75 and 76:
4.7 Summary of Torsion and Flexure
- Page 77 and 78:
foundation displayed the predicted
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 5-5. Specimen at failure 5.1
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 5-7. Torsional moment and ro
- Page 83 and 84:
torsional 45 degree crack formation
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 5-11. Widening of concrete b
- Page 87 and 88:
Failure cracks widen Bond loosens F
- Page 89 and 90:
Rear of shaft Figure 5-14. Load and
- Page 91 and 92:
testing, signifying that the predic
- Page 93 and 94:
provided in NCHRP Report 412 were i
- Page 95 and 96:
6.2.2 Tapered Embedded Steel Pipe a
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 6-3. FDOT Design Standards I
- Page 99 and 100:
This option provides a possible alt
- Page 101 and 102:
6.2.5 Cast-in-Place Solid Concrete
- Page 103 and 104:
This option does have some disadvan
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6-9. Embedded steel pipe and
- Page 107 and 108:
However, the fillet welds are susce
- Page 109 and 110:
APPENDIX A TEST APPARATUS DRAWINGS
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure A-3. Dimensioned side elevat
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure A-5. Dimensioned drawings of
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure A-7. Dimensioned plan drawin
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure A-9. Dimensioned drawing of
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure A-11. Dimensioned view of em
- Page 121 and 122:
STIFFENER DESIGN Calculation of Cap
- Page 123 and 124: L breakout Concrete Breakout Equiva
- Page 125 and 126: Abrg L⋅b 7 in 2 := = .5 Nsb 200
- Page 127 and 128: β 1 f c Calculations Using ACI Str
- Page 129 and 130: Determine Flexural Capacity of Roun
- Page 131 and 132: DEVELOPMENT LENGTHS OF FLEXURAL REI
- Page 133 and 134: Short Pipe Design Flexural Strength
- Page 135 and 136: Long Pipe Design Flexural Strength
- Page 137 and 138: Superstructure Assembly Strength -
- Page 139 and 140: Weld Design Tn_blowout Vweld := Tor
- Page 141 and 142: Check_Bolt_Shear := "Sufficient Str
- Page 143 and 144: Check Reinforcement No_Bars_Block_R
- Page 145 and 146: Tie-Down Design Block Properties Wi
- Page 147 and 148: Vmax Total Load that the Tie-down m
- Page 149 and 150: λpf := .38⋅ λpw := 3.76⋅ E F
- Page 151 and 152: Input and Properties Shaft Torsion
- Page 153 and 154: ψcV := 1.4 ψecV := 1.0 ψedV := 1
- Page 155 and 156: lbreakout := L + 2⋅1.5ca1 lbreako
- Page 157 and 158: Rn_weld := Throat⋅FW Rn_weld 11.1
- Page 159 and 160: ⎛ ⎜ ⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜ 9.250
- Page 161 and 162: Flexural Capacity of T-Plates Using
- Page 163 and 164: FAILURE EQUATIONS Torsion Threshold
- Page 165 and 166: Required Length of Shaft Based on B
- Page 167 and 168: Design Axial Strength ϕcomp := .90
- Page 169 and 170: Design Axial Strength ϕcomp := .90
- Page 171 and 172: Zp := ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ bp tp⋅ 2 ⎞
- Page 173: Bolt Properties - D1" ASTM A325 Cen
- Page 177 and 178: Check Shear Check_Shear_B := "Suffi
- Page 179 and 180: 7'-4" 8" 5'-4" 8" 1'-3" Calculate s
- Page 181 and 182: Required Capacity of the Channel As
- Page 183 and 184: Check_Flange_Compact_Unit := "Compa
- Page 185 and 186: Rear of Shaft Face of Shaft Figure
- Page 187 and 188: Bolt slippage ends Predicted failur
- Page 189 and 190: APPENDIX D DESIGN GUIDELINES For th
- Page 191 and 192: The designer should then use this i
- Page 193 and 194: • Determine the angle required fo
- Page 195 and 196: Superstructure Base Connection Foun
- Page 197 and 198: 1.5ca1 1.5ca1 Length of bearing are
- Page 199 and 200: Vu = 9.04 kip T .u = 198.88 ft·kip
- Page 201 and 202: Increase threaded rod diameter to 2
- Page 203 and 204: Embedded Pipe and Torsion Plates De
- Page 205 and 206: ⎝ ⎠ Check_Breakout_Torsion := "
- Page 207 and 208: Lbreakout := tflex.plate + 2⋅1.5c
- Page 209 and 210: ( ) .85 if fc < 4000psi β 1 f c .6
- Page 211 and 212: REFERENCES 1. Cook, R.A., and Halco