Alternative Support Systems for Cantilever - National Transportation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Embedded Pipe and Flexure Plate Design Step 4) Embedded Pipe and Flexure Plate Design Given Given ϕflex = 0.9 Diameterembed.pipe = 16⋅in ϕweld = 0.75 twall.embed.pipe = 0.375⋅in ϕtor = 0.9 fy.pipe = 42⋅ksi fu.pipe = 58⋅ksi Es 2.9 10 4 = × ⋅ksi Vu = 9.04 kip Tu = 198.88 ft·kip Mu = 165.34 ft·kip Diametershaft = 42⋅in Lshaft = 12 ft f'c = 5.5⋅ksi Based on ACI 318-08 Appendix D - Anchorage to Concrete Estimate flexure plate section properties and refine if necessary Nflex.plate.bear := 4 Number of idealized flexural bearing positions on flexure plate tflex.plate := 1in Thickness of flexure plate, minimum of 1 in. Diameterflex.plate := 20in Diameter of flexure plate, minimum of 2 in. greater than embedded plate Diametershaft − Diameterflex.plate cover := cover = 11⋅in 2 ca1 := ⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ Diameter flex.plate 2 ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ 2 + 3.25⋅ ⎢ ⎡ ⎛ ⎢⎜ ⎣⎝ Diameter shaft 2 ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ 2 − 3.25 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ Diameter flex.plate 2 2 ⎞ ⎥ ⎤ ⎟ ⎥ ⎠ ⎦ − ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ca1 = 7.618⋅in 360deg A := = 1.571 A = 90⋅deg Nflex.plate.bear Diameter flex.plate Diametershaft chord_group 2⋅ sin 2 A := ⋅ ⎛ ⎞ chord_group = 2.475 ft 2 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ ⎟ ⎠ 3.0⋅ca1 Amin_group := 2⋅asin A Diameter min_group = 65.936⋅deg shaft Check_Group_Effect := "Group Effect" if A ≤ Amin_group Check_Group_Effect = "No Group Effect" "No Group Effect" otherwise 190 2 ⎤ ⎞⎥ ⎟⎥ ⎠⎦
Lbreakout := tflex.plate + 2⋅1.5ca1 Lbreakout = 23.855⋅in ( ) 3 AVc := min Lbreakout, Lshaft ⋅ ⋅ca1 AVc 545.219 in 2 = ⋅ 2 AVco := 4.5⋅ca1 AVco 261.182 in 2 = ⋅ ( ) bflex.plate := .5⋅ Diameterflex.plate − Diameterembed.pipe bflex.plate = 2⋅in π Lflex.plate 8 Diameter := ⋅( embed.pipe + 2 ⋅.5⋅bflex.plate) Lflex.plate = 7.069⋅in le := Lflex.plate le = 7.069⋅in .2 1.5 ⎛ le ⎞ bflex.plate f'c ⎛ ca1⎞ Vb := 13⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅⎜ ⎟ ⋅lbf V tflex.plate in psi ⎝ in b = 42.394 kip ⎠ ⎜ ⎝ ⎟ ⎠ ψcV := 1.4 Modification factor for cracking in concrete ψecV := 1.0 Modification factor for anchor groups ψedV := 1.0 Modification factor for edge effects ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ AVc Vcbg := ⋅ψ A ecV⋅ψedV⋅ψcV⋅Vb Vcbg = 123.897 kip Vco Vcbg_parallel := 2⋅Vcbg Vcbg_parallel = 247.794 kip Vc := Vcbg_parallel ⋅.5Nflex.plate.bear Vc = 495.587 kip ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ Diameterembed.pipe Mn.breakout.plate := ϕtor⋅Vc⋅ M 2 n.breakout.plate = 297.352 ft·kip Check_Breakout_Flexure := "Sufficient" if Mn.breakout.plate ≥ Tu Weld Design for Flexure Plate "Not Sufficient" if Mn.breakout.plate < Tu ( ) Check_Breakout_Flexure = "Sufficient" max Mu , Mn.breakout.plate Vweld.flex := V Diameter weld.flex = 178.411 kip flex.plate Select weld properties and revise if necessary 1 Weld_Size 4 in := AISC Spec. J2 Table J2.4 Felectrode := 70ksi FW := .6⋅Felectrode AISC Spec. J2 Table J2.5 191
Page 1 and 2:
Report No. BDK75 977-04 Date: Augus
Page 3 and 4:
Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN
Page 5 and 6:
ALTERNATIVE SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR CAN
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the 2004 h
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODU
Page 11 and 12:
Torsion Test Data .................
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure page Figure
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 4-15. Arrangement of the LVD
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This project
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND The following
Page 21 and 22:
information obtained in the late 19
Page 23 and 24:
these problems. The concern with fa
Page 25 and 26:
opposite side, see Figure 2-2 The s
Page 27 and 28:
2.2.4 Helical Pipes This option wou
Page 29 and 30:
2.3 Alternative Foundations from Ot
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-10. Drilled concrete piles
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2-13. Grouted soil anchors G
Page 35 and 36:
The pad and pier foundation, found
Page 37 and 38:
comments and recommendations on pre
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 3 DESIGN IMPLICATIONS Based
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 3-2. Differences between con
Page 43 and 44:
2 [ ] 2 2 ( r ) + 3. 25 ( r ) − (
Page 45 and 46:
eakout surface for a single plate,
Page 47 and 48:
strength of a headed anchor in tens
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 3-9. Schematic of anticipate
Page 51 and 52:
Vbfp l e tfp bfp f’c ca1 = the ba
Page 53 and 54:
3.2.2 Equivalent Side-Face Blowout
Page 55 and 56:
computed. See Equation 3-14 below t
Page 57 and 58:
One method to quantify the failure
Page 59 and 60:
• An additional 12-4.5” long, 1
Page 61 and 62:
Applied load Lever arm Figure 4-4.
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 4-8. Isometric view of embed
Page 65 and 66:
Flexural plate breakout area Torsio
Page 67 and 68:
4.2.4 Annular Base Plate Design The
Page 69 and 70:
torsional strength of the lever arm
Page 71 and 72:
4.4 Concrete Block and Tie-Down Des
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 4-13. Arrangement of the LVD
Page 75 and 76:
4.7 Summary of Torsion and Flexure
Page 77 and 78:
foundation displayed the predicted
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 5-5. Specimen at failure 5.1
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 5-7. Torsional moment and ro
Page 83 and 84:
torsional 45 degree crack formation
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 5-11. Widening of concrete b
Page 87 and 88:
Failure cracks widen Bond loosens F
Page 89 and 90:
Rear of shaft Figure 5-14. Load and
Page 91 and 92:
testing, signifying that the predic
Page 93 and 94:
provided in NCHRP Report 412 were i
Page 95 and 96:
6.2.2 Tapered Embedded Steel Pipe a
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 6-3. FDOT Design Standards I
Page 99 and 100:
This option provides a possible alt
Page 101 and 102:
6.2.5 Cast-in-Place Solid Concrete
Page 103 and 104:
This option does have some disadvan
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6-9. Embedded steel pipe and
Page 107 and 108:
However, the fillet welds are susce
Page 109 and 110:
APPENDIX A TEST APPARATUS DRAWINGS
Page 111 and 112:
Figure A-3. Dimensioned side elevat
Page 113 and 114:
Figure A-5. Dimensioned drawings of
Page 115 and 116:
Figure A-7. Dimensioned plan drawin
Page 117 and 118:
Figure A-9. Dimensioned drawing of
Page 119 and 120:
Figure A-11. Dimensioned view of em
Page 121 and 122:
STIFFENER DESIGN Calculation of Cap
Page 123 and 124:
L breakout Concrete Breakout Equiva
Page 125 and 126:
Abrg L⋅b 7 in 2 := = .5 Nsb 200
Page 127 and 128:
β 1 f c Calculations Using ACI Str
Page 129 and 130:
Determine Flexural Capacity of Roun
Page 131 and 132:
DEVELOPMENT LENGTHS OF FLEXURAL REI
Page 133 and 134:
Short Pipe Design Flexural Strength
Page 135 and 136:
Long Pipe Design Flexural Strength
Page 137 and 138:
Superstructure Assembly Strength -
Page 139 and 140:
Weld Design Tn_blowout Vweld := Tor
Page 141 and 142:
Check_Bolt_Shear := "Sufficient Str
Page 143 and 144:
Check Reinforcement No_Bars_Block_R
Page 145 and 146:
Tie-Down Design Block Properties Wi
Page 147 and 148:
Vmax Total Load that the Tie-down m
Page 149 and 150:
λpf := .38⋅ λpw := 3.76⋅ E F
Page 151 and 152:
Input and Properties Shaft Torsion
Page 153 and 154:
ψcV := 1.4 ψecV := 1.0 ψedV := 1
Page 155 and 156: lbreakout := L + 2⋅1.5ca1 lbreako
Page 157 and 158: Rn_weld := Throat⋅FW Rn_weld 11.1
Page 159 and 160: ⎛ ⎜ ⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜ 9.250
Page 161 and 162: Flexural Capacity of T-Plates Using
Page 163 and 164: FAILURE EQUATIONS Torsion Threshold
Page 165 and 166: Required Length of Shaft Based on B
Page 167 and 168: Design Axial Strength ϕcomp := .90
Page 169 and 170: Design Axial Strength ϕcomp := .90
Page 171 and 172: Zp := ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ bp tp⋅ 2 ⎞
Page 173 and 174: Bolt Properties - D1" ASTM A325 Cen
Page 175 and 176: CONCRETE BLOCK Concrete Block Desig
Page 177 and 178: Check Shear Check_Shear_B := "Suffi
Page 179 and 180: 7'-4" 8" 5'-4" 8" 1'-3" Calculate s
Page 181 and 182: Required Capacity of the Channel As
Page 183 and 184: Check_Flange_Compact_Unit := "Compa
Page 185 and 186: Rear of Shaft Face of Shaft Figure
Page 187 and 188: Bolt slippage ends Predicted failur
Page 189 and 190: APPENDIX D DESIGN GUIDELINES For th
Page 191 and 192: The designer should then use this i
Page 193 and 194: • Determine the angle required fo
Page 195 and 196: Superstructure Base Connection Foun
Page 197 and 198: 1.5ca1 1.5ca1 Length of bearing are
Page 199 and 200: Vu = 9.04 kip T .u = 198.88 ft·kip
Page 201 and 202: Increase threaded rod diameter to 2
Page 203 and 204: Embedded Pipe and Torsion Plates De
Page 205: ⎝ ⎠ Check_Breakout_Torsion := "
Page 209 and 210: ( ) .85 if fc < 4000psi β 1 f c .6
Page 211 and 212: REFERENCES 1. Cook, R.A., and Halco
show all

Alternative Support Systems for Cantilever - National Transportation ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?