04.05.2013 Views

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48<br />

associated displacement field <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stack<strong>in</strong>g fault to obta<strong>in</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tensity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fr<strong>in</strong>ges.<br />

As discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 2.6 stack<strong>in</strong>g faults are produced by a disruption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regular<br />

stack<strong>in</strong>g sequence <strong>of</strong> a material. It can also be seen as two regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crystal<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g been shifted relative to one ano<strong>the</strong>r by a distance given by a displacement<br />

vector R which may be a non-lattice translation as shown by Fig. 4.4. The<br />

displacement vector has a component parallel to <strong>the</strong> fault plane R|| and normal to it<br />

R . Thus <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> this fault will <strong>in</strong>troduce a phase shift α = 2πg·R which<br />

modifies <strong>the</strong> solution to <strong>the</strong> DHW equations for <strong>the</strong> bottom section (section II) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

crystal. If α is an <strong>in</strong>teger multiple <strong>of</strong> π no defect contrast will be seen which shows<br />

that R is a lattice translation vector and effectively no modification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solutions to<br />

<strong>the</strong> DHW equations result. If R is a non-lattice translation, α is not an <strong>in</strong>teger multiple<br />

<strong>of</strong> π and image contrast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> alternat<strong>in</strong>g light and dark fr<strong>in</strong>ges will be<br />

formed.<br />

Fig. 4.4. (a) Schematic illustration <strong>of</strong> a planar defect separat<strong>in</strong>g crystal sections I<br />

and II; (b) <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed planar defect comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> column approximation (from De<br />

Graef (2003))<br />

To simulate such an <strong>in</strong>tensity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g procedure is used. Consider a<br />

crystal with thickness z0 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a stack<strong>in</strong>g fault as shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4.4 (b). Region 1<br />

has been shifted with respect to region II by a vector R. The top section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crystal<br />

(region 1) is defect free and is described by a scatter<strong>in</strong>g matrix Sscat(s1.z1) where z1 is<br />

<strong>the</strong> distance from <strong>the</strong> top surface to <strong>the</strong> fault. The bottom section is shifted with<br />

respect to <strong>the</strong> top and is described by a different scatter<strong>in</strong>g matrix M(s2.z2) s<strong>in</strong>ce it lies<br />

<strong>in</strong> a different orientation with respect to <strong>the</strong> top. The two scatter<strong>in</strong>g matrices are as<br />

follows,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!