04.05.2013 Views

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72<br />

Table 7.1. The values used <strong>in</strong> calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> camera length. Rm is <strong>the</strong> measured<br />

values <strong>in</strong> arbitrary units us<strong>in</strong>g measur<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>of</strong>tware and R is <strong>the</strong> actual values <strong>in</strong><br />

meters obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g factor. A value <strong>of</strong> 5.43Å was used for <strong>the</strong> lattice<br />

parameter <strong>of</strong> Si.<br />

Index Rm R (<strong>in</strong> m) λL (<strong>in</strong> m 2 )<br />

93.49 0.007805 2.45E-12<br />

93.49 0.007805 2.45E-12<br />

91.39 0.00763 2.39E-12<br />

91.39 0.00763 2.39E-12<br />

107.27 0.008956 2.43E-12<br />

107.27 0.008956 2.43E-12<br />

Average 2.42E-12<br />

Table 7.2. The values used <strong>in</strong> calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> lattice parameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>SiC</strong>. Rm is <strong>the</strong><br />

measured values <strong>in</strong> arbitrary units us<strong>in</strong>g measur<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>of</strong>tware and R is <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

values <strong>in</strong> meters obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g factor.<br />

Index Rm R (<strong>in</strong> m) dhkl (<strong>in</strong> m) Lattice parameter (<strong>in</strong> m)<br />

116.37 0.009715 2.49E-10 4.32E-10<br />

115.86 0.009673 2.51E-10 4.34E-10<br />

115.90 0.009676 2.50E-10 4.34E-10<br />

114.67 0.009573 2.53E-10 4.38E-10<br />

133.69 0.011161 2.17E-10 4.34E-10<br />

132.43 0.011056 2.19E-10 4.38E-10<br />

Average 4.35E-10 ± 0.02E-10<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g this procedure, <strong>the</strong> lattice parameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SiC</strong> was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by tak<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parameters obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> and diffraction spots<br />

present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pattern. The lattice parameter was found to be 4.35Å ± 0.02Å.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore from <strong>the</strong> orientation relationship between <strong>the</strong> two sets <strong>of</strong> diffractions<br />

spots it is clear that exact epitaxial orientation between <strong>the</strong> two materials were<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g growth with <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g orientation relationship {001}Si || {001}<strong>SiC</strong><br />

and Si || <strong>SiC</strong>.<br />

Fig. 7.1 also shows evidence <strong>of</strong> planar <strong>defects</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface and<br />

extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SiC</strong>. This was confirmed by a high resolution TEM<br />

study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!