04.05.2013 Views

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

Analysis of the extended defects in 3C-SiC.pdf - Nelson Mandela ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

75<br />

Fig. 7.5. The stack<strong>in</strong>g fault selected for simulation with arrows po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

thickness fr<strong>in</strong>ges used for foil thickness determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

To verify <strong>the</strong> suggested nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fault image, simulation and match<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

performed. Fig. 7.5. shows a magnified bright field TEM micrograph <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SF shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.4. This fault was selected for <strong>the</strong> simulation and <strong>the</strong> assumed fault vector and<br />

partial dislocation burgers vectors were used. Follow<strong>in</strong>g this, <strong>the</strong> unknowns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

problem were determ<strong>in</strong>ed start<strong>in</strong>g with foil thickness. This was done us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

thickness fr<strong>in</strong>ges present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> micrograph as well as <strong>the</strong> technique <strong>of</strong> convergent<br />

beam electron diffraction (CBED) (De Graef (2003)).<br />

Thickness fr<strong>in</strong>ge method<br />

Consider Fig. 7.5. It is known that <strong>the</strong> thickness fr<strong>in</strong>ges present <strong>in</strong> a bright field (or<br />

dark field) micrograph follow <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>crements <strong>of</strong> 1/2ξ (ξ is ext<strong>in</strong>ction distance) for each<br />

successive bright to dark fr<strong>in</strong>ge start<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material (Hirsch et al.<br />

(1965)). Thus <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>the</strong> foil thickness was found to be approximately 2.75 ξ at<br />

<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fault us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> thickness fr<strong>in</strong>ges as <strong>in</strong>dicated. Us<strong>in</strong>g this and <strong>the</strong><br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction distance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> {111} reflection <strong>in</strong> <strong>3C</strong>-<strong>SiC</strong> <strong>the</strong> thickness was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

be ~ 188 nm. A value <strong>of</strong> 622 Å was used for <strong>the</strong> ext<strong>in</strong>ction distance and was found<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g Electron Diffraction (2003).<br />

3 ξ<br />

~2.75 ξ<br />

2 ξ<br />

5/2 ξ<br />

3/2 ξ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!