01.06.2013 Views

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />

Box 9: Standard Operational Procedure in a Merger Case<br />

(i) The Act provides that a merger assessment should be completed within a period of 90 days from the date of<br />

application with possible extension a maximum of 30 days.<br />

<br />

(iii) Record on Investigations Authorization Form.<br />

<br />

(v) Executive Director makes decision as to whether to pursue the matter.<br />

(vi) The Commission issues invoice to parties.<br />

<br />

(viii) Relevant statutory fees are paid.<br />

<br />

<br />

(xi) Opposition Procedure, i.e., Third Party views.<br />

<br />

(xiii) Director submits <strong>report</strong> to the Executive Director.<br />

(xiv) Executive Director submits the preliminary <strong>report</strong> to the Technical Committee of the Board of Commissioners<br />

<br />

<br />

warrant. The Board may: (i) reject the application; (ii) approve the application unconditionally; (iii) approve<br />

the application conditionally.<br />

NB: The Commission may where necessary issue directions to parties to a merger to (a) remedy, mitigate or<br />

prevent the substantial lessening of competition; and (b) remedy, mitigate or prevent any adverse effects that<br />

have resulted from, or are likely to result from, the substantial lessening of competition.<br />

(xv) If the parties do not agree with Board decision, they have 30 days to appeal to the Competition and<br />

Consumer Protection Tribunal.<br />

Source: Operations Manual, Directorate of Mergers and Monopolies, Zambia Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, 2011.<br />

In a typical merger case, pertinent areas covered<br />

include: (i) legal provisions and assessment tests<br />

(i.e., the relevant provisions of the Act, and the<br />

effect, dominance and public interest tests); (ii)<br />

investigations conducted (i.e., methodology); (iii)<br />

<br />

<br />

etc.); (iii) competition analysis and relevant observations;<br />

(iv) conclusions; and (v) recommendations.<br />

As an example, Box 10 below shows the Executive<br />

Summary of the <strong>report</strong> on the proposed merger<br />

between Cena Farms Zambia Limited and Mount<br />

Isabelle Limited.<br />

Box 10: Executive Summary of Staff Paper Report on Proposed Merger between Cena Farms<br />

Zambia Limited and Mount Isabelle Limited<br />

Background<br />

The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission on 12th May, 2010 received an application from Chibesakunda<br />

and Company concerning an application for authorization of a merger between Cena Farms Zambia Limited<br />

(“Cena Farms”) and Mount Isabelle Limited (“Mount Isabelle”) herein referred to as the parties. The proposed<br />

transaction entails that Cena Farms will acquire 100 per cent of Mount Isabelle at a purchase price of [ ].<br />

The parties have submitted that Cena Farms was incorporated in Zambia in 2009 under the Companies Act Cap<br />

<br />

No 4647 Beit Road in Lusaka while their business address is at Farm No. 2644 in Mkushi. The principal activity of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!