a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
122 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />
Box 9: Standard Operational Procedure in a Merger Case<br />
(i) The Act provides that a merger assessment should be completed within a period of 90 days from the date of<br />
application with possible extension a maximum of 30 days.<br />
<br />
(iii) Record on Investigations Authorization Form.<br />
<br />
(v) Executive Director makes decision as to whether to pursue the matter.<br />
(vi) The Commission issues invoice to parties.<br />
<br />
(viii) Relevant statutory fees are paid.<br />
<br />
<br />
(xi) Opposition Procedure, i.e., Third Party views.<br />
<br />
(xiii) Director submits <strong>report</strong> to the Executive Director.<br />
(xiv) Executive Director submits the preliminary <strong>report</strong> to the Technical Committee of the Board of Commissioners<br />
<br />
<br />
warrant. The Board may: (i) reject the application; (ii) approve the application unconditionally; (iii) approve<br />
the application conditionally.<br />
NB: The Commission may where necessary issue directions to parties to a merger to (a) remedy, mitigate or<br />
prevent the substantial lessening of competition; and (b) remedy, mitigate or prevent any adverse effects that<br />
have resulted from, or are likely to result from, the substantial lessening of competition.<br />
(xv) If the parties do not agree with Board decision, they have 30 days to appeal to the Competition and<br />
Consumer Protection Tribunal.<br />
Source: Operations Manual, Directorate of Mergers and Monopolies, Zambia Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, 2011.<br />
In a typical merger case, pertinent areas covered<br />
include: (i) legal provisions and assessment tests<br />
(i.e., the relevant provisions of the Act, and the<br />
effect, dominance and public interest tests); (ii)<br />
investigations conducted (i.e., methodology); (iii)<br />
<br />
<br />
etc.); (iii) competition analysis and relevant observations;<br />
(iv) conclusions; and (v) recommendations.<br />
As an example, Box 10 below shows the Executive<br />
Summary of the <strong>report</strong> on the proposed merger<br />
between Cena Farms Zambia Limited and Mount<br />
Isabelle Limited.<br />
Box 10: Executive Summary of Staff Paper Report on Proposed Merger between Cena Farms<br />
Zambia Limited and Mount Isabelle Limited<br />
Background<br />
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission on 12th May, 2010 received an application from Chibesakunda<br />
and Company concerning an application for authorization of a merger between Cena Farms Zambia Limited<br />
(“Cena Farms”) and Mount Isabelle Limited (“Mount Isabelle”) herein referred to as the parties. The proposed<br />
transaction entails that Cena Farms will acquire 100 per cent of Mount Isabelle at a purchase price of [ ].<br />
The parties have submitted that Cena Farms was incorporated in Zambia in 2009 under the Companies Act Cap<br />
<br />
No 4647 Beit Road in Lusaka while their business address is at Farm No. 2644 in Mkushi. The principal activity of the