01.06.2013 Views

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ZIMBABWE<br />

Regarding the handling of case of anticompetitive<br />

behavior, it should be pointed out that there are<br />

a number of success stories in the Commission’s<br />

handling of competition cases. As found out in a<br />

study undertaken in 2008 on the impact of the implementation<br />

of competition policy and law in Zimbabwe<br />

203 , the control and abolishment of restrictive<br />

<br />

socio-economic nature in the country. The Commission’s<br />

competition intervention into various industries<br />

and sectors in Zimbabwe through the issuance<br />

of remedial orders and conclusion of Consent<br />

Agreements or Undertakings on restrictive business<br />

practices can be summarized as follows:<br />

horizontal restraints arising from collusive and<br />

cartel-like behaviour of a grossly anticompetitive<br />

nature were abolished in key and essential<br />

industries and sectors, such as the cement<br />

industry, the coal industry and the dry cleaning<br />

and laundry services sector;<br />

vertical restraints with substantial economic and<br />

<br />

under control, in other essential industries like the<br />

coal tar fuel industry;<br />

<br />

in consumer products industries such as the<br />

alcoholic beverages industry and the cigarette<br />

industry, as well as in utilities sectors such as<br />

electricity and telecommunications that directly<br />

affect the consumer, were brought to an end; and<br />

entry barriers were removed in industries such as<br />

the cement industry, the coal industry, the sugar<br />

industry, and the fertilizer industry, resulting in<br />

the introduction of new economic players and<br />

increased employment.<br />

More recently, the Commission’s intervention in<br />

the health insurance services sector, through its<br />

full-scale investigation into the abusive practices<br />

Table 6: Commission’s Merger Determinations From 1999 to Date<br />

Merger Determination<br />

Period<br />

1999-2005<br />

2006-2009<br />

2010-2011<br />

2012 to date<br />

Source: CTC<br />

199<br />

by Cimas Medical Aid Society against liver dialysis<br />

patients, resulted in the issuance of remedial orders<br />

that not only strengthened competition in that<br />

sector but also had immense consumer protection<br />

<br />

sector, through another full-scale investigation<br />

into abuse of monopoly position by the electricity<br />

utility, also got acclaims from the government, the<br />

business community, and the general public because<br />

its remedial orders had far-reaching positive<br />

implications of a socio-economic nature.<br />

Despite these success stories, given the architecture<br />

of the law with regard to issues is considered<br />

to be Restrictive Practices in ZCA and the nature<br />

prohibitions associated to the anticompetitive restrictive<br />

practices, without prejudice to the sovereignty<br />

of CTC’s decisions, it is logical to conclude<br />

that there is need a new law to properly provide<br />

for restrictive practices, identify and sharpen offences<br />

associates to such practices and prohibit<br />

the same commensurately.<br />

Invariably, there arises an issue of concern as to<br />

what makes many cases be dropped after they<br />

<br />

that the inadequacies in the law and lack of proper<br />

competition knowledge at both the staff and<br />

Commission levels have contributed to such a scenario,<br />

hence the need for remedial action to such<br />

undesired state of affairs at CTC.<br />

3.8.2.2 Merger control<br />

The Commission has made determinations on a<br />

total of 137 mergers and acquisitions since it effectively<br />

commenced its operations in 1999. Of those,<br />

71 transactions were determined during the period<br />

1999-2005, 49 during the period 2006-2009,<br />

16 during the period 2010-2011, and 1 already<br />

determined so far during the current 2012 year, as<br />

shown in Table 6 below:<br />

Comments<br />

Of the 71 mergers that were determined during the period 1999-2005, 52 were approved without any conditions,<br />

11 were approved with some conditions204, 6 were not challenged205, and 2 were prohibited.<br />

Of the 49 mergers and acquisitions that the Commission determined during the period 2006-2009, 33 were<br />

approved without any conditions, 11 were approved with some conditions, and 5 were not challenged.`<br />

Of the 16 mergers that were determined during the period 2010-2011, 11 were approved unconditionally,<br />

while the remaining 5 were approved with some conditions.<br />

So far this year, the only merger that was determined by the Commission was approved without any conditions.<br />

ZIMBABWE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!