a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ZIMBABWE<br />
Regarding the handling of case of anticompetitive<br />
behavior, it should be pointed out that there are<br />
a number of success stories in the Commission’s<br />
handling of competition cases. As found out in a<br />
study undertaken in 2008 on the impact of the implementation<br />
of competition policy and law in Zimbabwe<br />
203 , the control and abolishment of restrictive<br />
<br />
socio-economic nature in the country. The Commission’s<br />
competition intervention into various industries<br />
and sectors in Zimbabwe through the issuance<br />
of remedial orders and conclusion of Consent<br />
Agreements or Undertakings on restrictive business<br />
practices can be summarized as follows:<br />
horizontal restraints arising from collusive and<br />
cartel-like behaviour of a grossly anticompetitive<br />
nature were abolished in key and essential<br />
industries and sectors, such as the cement<br />
industry, the coal industry and the dry cleaning<br />
and laundry services sector;<br />
vertical restraints with substantial economic and<br />
<br />
under control, in other essential industries like the<br />
coal tar fuel industry;<br />
<br />
in consumer products industries such as the<br />
alcoholic beverages industry and the cigarette<br />
industry, as well as in utilities sectors such as<br />
electricity and telecommunications that directly<br />
affect the consumer, were brought to an end; and<br />
entry barriers were removed in industries such as<br />
the cement industry, the coal industry, the sugar<br />
industry, and the fertilizer industry, resulting in<br />
the introduction of new economic players and<br />
increased employment.<br />
More recently, the Commission’s intervention in<br />
the health insurance services sector, through its<br />
full-scale investigation into the abusive practices<br />
Table 6: Commission’s Merger Determinations From 1999 to Date<br />
Merger Determination<br />
Period<br />
1999-2005<br />
2006-2009<br />
2010-2011<br />
2012 to date<br />
Source: CTC<br />
199<br />
by Cimas Medical Aid Society against liver dialysis<br />
patients, resulted in the issuance of remedial orders<br />
that not only strengthened competition in that<br />
sector but also had immense consumer protection<br />
<br />
sector, through another full-scale investigation<br />
into abuse of monopoly position by the electricity<br />
utility, also got acclaims from the government, the<br />
business community, and the general public because<br />
its remedial orders had far-reaching positive<br />
implications of a socio-economic nature.<br />
Despite these success stories, given the architecture<br />
of the law with regard to issues is considered<br />
to be Restrictive Practices in ZCA and the nature<br />
prohibitions associated to the anticompetitive restrictive<br />
practices, without prejudice to the sovereignty<br />
of CTC’s decisions, it is logical to conclude<br />
that there is need a new law to properly provide<br />
for restrictive practices, identify and sharpen offences<br />
associates to such practices and prohibit<br />
the same commensurately.<br />
Invariably, there arises an issue of concern as to<br />
what makes many cases be dropped after they<br />
<br />
that the inadequacies in the law and lack of proper<br />
competition knowledge at both the staff and<br />
Commission levels have contributed to such a scenario,<br />
hence the need for remedial action to such<br />
undesired state of affairs at CTC.<br />
3.8.2.2 Merger control<br />
The Commission has made determinations on a<br />
total of 137 mergers and acquisitions since it effectively<br />
commenced its operations in 1999. Of those,<br />
71 transactions were determined during the period<br />
1999-2005, 49 during the period 2006-2009,<br />
16 during the period 2010-2011, and 1 already<br />
determined so far during the current 2012 year, as<br />
shown in Table 6 below:<br />
Comments<br />
Of the 71 mergers that were determined during the period 1999-2005, 52 were approved without any conditions,<br />
11 were approved with some conditions204, 6 were not challenged205, and 2 were prohibited.<br />
Of the 49 mergers and acquisitions that the Commission determined during the period 2006-2009, 33 were<br />
approved without any conditions, 11 were approved with some conditions, and 5 were not challenged.`<br />
Of the 16 mergers that were determined during the period 2010-2011, 11 were approved unconditionally,<br />
while the remaining 5 were approved with some conditions.<br />
So far this year, the only merger that was determined by the Commission was approved without any conditions.<br />
ZIMBABWE