01.06.2013 Views

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />

Such an open ended phrase “as soon as practicable”<br />

may cause long delays to the notifying parties<br />

given that the parties to a merger have a legitimate<br />

interest to know how long the merger control<br />

procedure will last. This is a major shortcoming<br />

petition<br />

enforcement on mergers and acquisitions<br />

aspect in Zimbabwe.<br />

In practice most merger control regimes are based<br />

on similar underlying principle of prohibiting the<br />

creation or strengthening of a dominant position<br />

which would result in either substantial lessening<br />

<br />

impediment to effective competition in a particular<br />

relevant market. The merger test is usually<br />

crafted to prohibit those mergers that either create<br />

or strengthen a position of dominance in a relevant<br />

market.<br />

The ZCA has attempted to provide for this test<br />

in Section 32 (1) that “… In determining, for the<br />

purposes of section thirty-one, whether or not<br />

any restrictive practice, merger or monopoly situation<br />

is or will be contrary to the public interest …”<br />

and Section 32 (4) “the Commission shall regard<br />

a merger as contrary to the public interest if the<br />

<br />

(a) has lessened substantially or is likely to lessen<br />

substantially the degree of competition<br />

in Zimbabwe or any substantial part of<br />

Zimbabwe; or<br />

(b) has resulted or is likely to result in a monopoly<br />

situation which is or will be contrary to the<br />

public interest”.<br />

The Section 32 (1) prohibits mergers which are<br />

contrary to public interest; Section 32 (4) impliedly<br />

<br />

(b) which covers both creation and strengthening<br />

of dominance in the market. It can be observed<br />

that the prohibition is scattered in Sections 2, 32<br />

(1), 32 (4) and 34 of the ZCA, makes the interpretation<br />

of the ZCA in so far as prohibited mergers<br />

is concerned a complicated undertaking. To make<br />

it simple, the prohibition of mergers would directly<br />

and categorically target the creation and strengthen<br />

of position of dominance/monopoly situation.<br />

If it appears that the merger is likely to substantially<br />

prevent or lessen competition in Zimbabwe<br />

or any part of Zimbabwe, the Commission then<br />

determines whether the merger is likely to result<br />

petitive<br />

gain which would be greater than and offset<br />

the effects of any prevention or lessening of<br />

competition that may result or likely result from<br />

the merger, and would not likely be obtained if the<br />

merger is prevented.<br />

The pro-competitive gains include economies of<br />

scale or other reason resulting into or are likely to<br />

<br />

business, trade or industry, necessary for the production,<br />

supply or distribution of any commodity<br />

or service in Zimbabwe.<br />

alty<br />

of up to 10 per cent of either or both of the<br />

merging parties’ annual turnovers in Zimbabwe.<br />

There are no provisions to provide for a procedure<br />

to handle a breach of merger condition as it<br />

may be ordered under Section 31 (2) (e). Invariably<br />

there is no provision to sanction such breach in the<br />

ZCA. Section 33 of the ZCA attempts to provide for<br />

this, by allowing for the registration of the CTC orders<br />

for enforcement purposes and the penalty for<br />

failure to comply with such orders. Whilst Section<br />

33 (2) provides that once registered, the order of<br />

the CTC has the effect of a civil judgment, the same<br />

Section under Subsection (7) goes on to prescribe<br />

a criminal penalty for failure to comply with any<br />

provision of the order, thus derailing its potency.<br />

This is an anomaly that needs to be addressed.<br />

Penalties associated with breach of merger pro-<br />

<br />

provided in Section 34 A (4) are too wide (1 – 10<br />

per cent of either or both of the merging parties)<br />

hence giving room for exercise of greater discretion<br />

than prudence would demand. The lower limit<br />

should have been elevated especially considering<br />

the gravity of the offences as provided in Section<br />

34 A (3) (a) and (b).<br />

2.4 Consumer Protection/Unfair<br />

Competition Issues<br />

Consumer protection laws are designed to ensure<br />

<br />

truthful information in the marketplace. The laws<br />

are designed to prevent businesses that engage in<br />

<br />

advantage over competitors and may provide additional<br />

protection for the weak and those unable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!