a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ZAMBIA<br />
the weather is dry in the country. It is evident that the relevant product market has recorded new entrants in the<br />
market with respect to commercial farmers.<br />
However, the relevant product markets have recorded numerous entrants with respect to farming and that farming<br />
is one of the most widely performed activities in Zambia and it continually attracts new entrants on the market, both<br />
commercial, small scale and subsistence farmers. The proposed acquisition of assets of Mount Isabelle by Cena<br />
Farms is not likely to pose a threat to result in exit of other competitors to the undertaking in the relevant product<br />
<br />
Consideration of Dominant Position<br />
<br />
Competition and Consumer Protection Act, No. 24 of 2010 that states that “a dominant position exists in relation<br />
to the supply of goods or services in Zambia, if thirty (30) per cent or more of those goods or services are supplied<br />
or acquired by one enterprise”. Cena Farms currently holds less than 30 per cent in the relevant product markets.<br />
Consideration of Abuse of Dominant Position of Market Power<br />
In the current case the threat for abuse in the relevant product market arising from this transaction is not likely<br />
because of the perceived low barriers to entry and having experienced recently numerous entrants attracted by<br />
government incentives and favourable climate and soil, among others. Therefore, the potential for abuse of market<br />
power by Cena Farms in the relevant product market is not likely to lead to abuse of market power which can only<br />
be done and sustained by a dominant undertaking.<br />
Consideration of Third Party Views<br />
The third parties that submitted their comments regarding the proposed merger between Cena Farms and Mount<br />
Isabelle supported the transaction based on reasons that it is not likely to adversely affect competition and also accent<br />
public interest issues that would likely to accrue from the transaction through additional jobs at the farms. This<br />
is so because the third parties felt that if the merger was sanctioned it would lead to increased competition in the<br />
market due to increased productivity, resulting into improved quality of services being provided to the consumers.<br />
<br />
two parties are in the same line of business, therefore, most employees were likely to be retained.<br />
Recommendations<br />
Given the foregoing analysis and conclusions, the Technical Committee of the Board of Commissioners recommends<br />
to the Board of Commissioners that unconditional authorization be granted to the parties because preliminary<br />
investigations and assessment have revealed that the transaction would not raise any competition concerns<br />
that may lead to substantial lessening of competition or abuse of dominant position of market power in the<br />
economy of Zambia.<br />
Source: Staff Paper Report on Proposed Merger between Cena Farms Zambia Limited and Mount Isabelle Limited, CCPC.<br />
The Commission’s examination of the above Cena<br />
Farms Zambia Limited/ Mount Isabelle Limited<br />
merger, which the Board of Commissioners unconditionally<br />
authorized, shows that the examination<br />
was based on the merger control provisions<br />
of the Act, including economic analysis, and that<br />
the substantive test for assessing mergers as provided<br />
for in the Act was applied. The examination<br />
was also based on stakeholder consultations. It is<br />
however noted that the Technical Committee of<br />
the Board of Commissioners granted an interim<br />
authorization of the transaction “because the<br />
preliminary market enquiry showed that the proposed<br />
transaction would not likely prevent, restrict<br />
or distort competition to an appreciable extent in<br />
the relevant product market and that it was un-<br />
125<br />
likely to have a detriment effect on the economy<br />
of Zambia in general”. The Act does not provide<br />
for interim authorizations of mergers. 147 In the case<br />
of the Cena Farms Zambia Limited/ Mount Isabelle<br />
Limited merger, tively<br />
been authorized on the recommendation of<br />
<br />
meeting of the Board of Commissioners, if it was<br />
of an urgent matter, since it raised no serious competition<br />
concerns.<br />
The stakeholders that were interviewed during the<br />
-<br />
-<br />
<br />
under the new Act. Sentiments expressed in that<br />
ZAMBIA