01.06.2013 Views

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ZAMBIA<br />

the weather is dry in the country. It is evident that the relevant product market has recorded new entrants in the<br />

market with respect to commercial farmers.<br />

However, the relevant product markets have recorded numerous entrants with respect to farming and that farming<br />

is one of the most widely performed activities in Zambia and it continually attracts new entrants on the market, both<br />

commercial, small scale and subsistence farmers. The proposed acquisition of assets of Mount Isabelle by Cena<br />

Farms is not likely to pose a threat to result in exit of other competitors to the undertaking in the relevant product<br />

<br />

Consideration of Dominant Position<br />

<br />

Competition and Consumer Protection Act, No. 24 of 2010 that states that “a dominant position exists in relation<br />

to the supply of goods or services in Zambia, if thirty (30) per cent or more of those goods or services are supplied<br />

or acquired by one enterprise”. Cena Farms currently holds less than 30 per cent in the relevant product markets.<br />

Consideration of Abuse of Dominant Position of Market Power<br />

In the current case the threat for abuse in the relevant product market arising from this transaction is not likely<br />

because of the perceived low barriers to entry and having experienced recently numerous entrants attracted by<br />

government incentives and favourable climate and soil, among others. Therefore, the potential for abuse of market<br />

power by Cena Farms in the relevant product market is not likely to lead to abuse of market power which can only<br />

be done and sustained by a dominant undertaking.<br />

Consideration of Third Party Views<br />

The third parties that submitted their comments regarding the proposed merger between Cena Farms and Mount<br />

Isabelle supported the transaction based on reasons that it is not likely to adversely affect competition and also accent<br />

public interest issues that would likely to accrue from the transaction through additional jobs at the farms. This<br />

is so because the third parties felt that if the merger was sanctioned it would lead to increased competition in the<br />

market due to increased productivity, resulting into improved quality of services being provided to the consumers.<br />

<br />

two parties are in the same line of business, therefore, most employees were likely to be retained.<br />

Recommendations<br />

Given the foregoing analysis and conclusions, the Technical Committee of the Board of Commissioners recommends<br />

to the Board of Commissioners that unconditional authorization be granted to the parties because preliminary<br />

investigations and assessment have revealed that the transaction would not raise any competition concerns<br />

that may lead to substantial lessening of competition or abuse of dominant position of market power in the<br />

economy of Zambia.<br />

Source: Staff Paper Report on Proposed Merger between Cena Farms Zambia Limited and Mount Isabelle Limited, CCPC.<br />

The Commission’s examination of the above Cena<br />

Farms Zambia Limited/ Mount Isabelle Limited<br />

merger, which the Board of Commissioners unconditionally<br />

authorized, shows that the examination<br />

was based on the merger control provisions<br />

of the Act, including economic analysis, and that<br />

the substantive test for assessing mergers as provided<br />

for in the Act was applied. The examination<br />

was also based on stakeholder consultations. It is<br />

however noted that the Technical Committee of<br />

the Board of Commissioners granted an interim<br />

authorization of the transaction “because the<br />

preliminary market enquiry showed that the proposed<br />

transaction would not likely prevent, restrict<br />

or distort competition to an appreciable extent in<br />

the relevant product market and that it was un-<br />

125<br />

likely to have a detriment effect on the economy<br />

of Zambia in general”. The Act does not provide<br />

for interim authorizations of mergers. 147 In the case<br />

of the Cena Farms Zambia Limited/ Mount Isabelle<br />

Limited merger, tively<br />

been authorized on the recommendation of<br />

<br />

meeting of the Board of Commissioners, if it was<br />

of an urgent matter, since it raised no serious competition<br />

concerns.<br />

The stakeholders that were interviewed during the<br />

-<br />

-<br />

<br />

under the new Act. Sentiments expressed in that<br />

ZAMBIA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!