a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
188 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />
independency is silently withdrawn by Section 18<br />
that the Minister may give the Commission such<br />
general directions relating to the policy the Commission<br />
is to observe in the exercise of its functions<br />
as the Minister considers being necessary in the<br />
national interest.<br />
<br />
and in the general context within which they are<br />
mentioned, they pose a huge potential for interferences<br />
with the independency provided for<br />
in Section 5(3) notwithstanding the caveats prescribed<br />
in Section 18 (2) especially considering<br />
the manner the Commission is supposed to act<br />
to such policy directions as provided in Section 18<br />
(3) that the Commission shall take all necessary<br />
steps to comply with any direction given to it by<br />
the Minister.<br />
With regard to validity of decisions and acts of<br />
Commission and committees as provided under<br />
Section 19 that “No decision or act of the Commission<br />
or a committee and no act that is authorized<br />
by the Commission or a committee shall be invalid<br />
solely because there was a vacancy in the membership<br />
of the Commission or the committee or<br />
<br />
a member of the Commission or the committee,<br />
as the case may be, at the time the decision was<br />
taken or the act was done or authorized.<br />
This provision can be construed to defeat the purpose<br />
of appointment of members as provided under<br />
Section 6 and validity of meetings where decisions<br />
are made (regarding quorum) as provided<br />
under Section 13 (6) thus being contrary to principles<br />
of good regulation that ensures due process<br />
in delivery of competition justice.<br />
3.1.2 The Directorate of the CTC<br />
The organigram of the CTC as supported by the<br />
ZCA provides for the Board of Commissioners as<br />
the oversight Board which works supervises the<br />
Secretariat/Directorate which is led by a director<br />
as appointed under Section 17 (1) and Assistant<br />
Directors under Section 17 (6).<br />
The internal structure of the directorate is deemed<br />
to be ideal given the prevailing conditions that<br />
CTC also deal with Tariff as another core mandate,<br />
thus having a division of its own. The structure ca-<br />
<br />
be subdivided into narrow thematic areas such as<br />
mergers and cartels as the law develops overtime.<br />
Staff recruitment has also been done to complement<br />
the dichotomy of law and economics ideal<br />
for a competition authority.<br />
Problems lie with the relative inexperience of most<br />
staff and the lack of specialized training on competition<br />
as shall be discussed later in the subsequent<br />
subtopics.<br />
3.2 Sources of Competition Cases<br />
Statutorily, CTC’s major sources of competition<br />
cases are (i) complaints from the business community<br />
and the general public (ii) concerns learnt<br />
toral<br />
studies (iv) ministerial instructions from the<br />
government (v) referrals from sector regulators.<br />
These are conventional ways for which competition<br />
authorities globally employ in identifying issues<br />
to be dealt with by competition law. Handling<br />
of the complaints is as provided hereunder.<br />
3.2.1 Handling of Competition<br />
Complaints at CTC<br />
CTC’s directorate undertakes preliminary investigation<br />
into the allegation in order to identify and<br />
assess the nature of competition issue so as to<br />
establish a prima facie case for a full-scale investigation<br />
under Section 28 of the ZCA. The investigations<br />
undertaken involve information gathering<br />
and interviews with major stakeholders (competitors,<br />
customers, suppliers, policymakers, etc.) and<br />
analysis of the information gathered. Draft <strong>report</strong>s<br />
(with appropriate recommendations) on the preliminary<br />
investigations undertaken are thoroughly<br />
considered and debated by the Directorate’s Operations<br />
Committee before they are submitted to<br />
the relevant Committee of the Commission 188 and<br />
ultimately to the full Commission for determination.<br />
According to CTC <strong>report</strong>s, there are four committees<br />
formed, Audit & Administration Committee,<br />
Mergers & Restrictive Practices Committee, Tariffs<br />
Committee and the Legal & Enforcement Committee.<br />
The committees would basically sit to deliberate<br />
and sharpen recommendations emanating<br />
from Directorate’s Operations Committee in<br />
the spirit of bettering the exercise of CTC’s function<br />
as provided under Section 14 (1).