a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
134 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />
against the anticompetitive elements. The same<br />
applies to vertical restraints. Therefore, the break-<br />
<br />
economies of scale, or the elimination of vertical<br />
restraint agreements or arrangements that serve<br />
<br />
could therefore be an extreme form of remedy. It<br />
must be noted that care must be taken to avoid<br />
imposing greater costs than those incurred by the<br />
anticompetitive conduct.<br />
Restitution and payment of damages are also<br />
generally considered to be appropriate remedies<br />
in abuse cases.<br />
Section 65 of the Act provides for enforcement of<br />
competition law by the Commission at the request<br />
of foreign competition authorities, and for positive<br />
comity. Section 65(1) provides that “a foreign<br />
competition authority may, where it has reasonable<br />
grounds to believe that anticompetitive practices<br />
in Zambia are damaging competition in the<br />
country of the authority, request the Commission<br />
to investigate and make an appropriate determi-<br />
<br />
from other members of COMESA and/or SADC by<br />
virtue of the obligations that Zambia has assumed<br />
towards these regional organizations. It also ap-<br />
<br />
in the Gazette, that Zambia has entered into an<br />
agreement with one or more States or organizations<br />
whereby, on a basis of reciprocity, each party<br />
to the agreement shall exercise the principle of<br />
comity … in investigating and determining cases<br />
falling within its jurisdiction”.<br />
The above provisions greatly facilitate Zambia’s<br />
cooperation with other countries in the effective<br />
implementation of competition policy and law,<br />
both regionally and internationally.<br />
The provisions of section 66 of the Act also greatly<br />
facilitate the effective implementation of competition<br />
policy and law in Zambia. They provide that<br />
“the Minister may, by statutory instrument, on<br />
the recommendation of the Commission, make<br />
regulations to provide for the manner in which investigations<br />
under this Part shall be carried out”.<br />
The importance of the provisions is that they enable<br />
the Commission to lay out in more detail,<br />
which can be subjected to frequent changes and<br />
amendments, pertinent matters pertaining to procedural<br />
issues. As has already been stated earlier,<br />
the main regulations to the Act, the Competition<br />
and Consumer Protection (General) Regulations,<br />
2011, were gazetted on 19 August 2011 as Statutory<br />
Instrument No.97 of 2011. The regulations<br />
cover the following areas: (i) determination of relevant<br />
product market; (ii) market inquiry process;<br />
(iii) application for authorization of horizontal or<br />
vertical agreement, and application for exemption;<br />
(iv) threshold for authorization of proposed<br />
merger, and application for negative clearance; (v)<br />
authorization of investigations, notice of investigation,<br />
unannounced raid on premises, form of consent<br />
agreement, undertakings, and investigation<br />
at request of foreign competition authority; (vi)<br />
lodging of complaints; and (vii) service of documents<br />
on Commission, service of documents on<br />
person other than Commission, service of notice<br />
by Commission, Inspectors, and fees.<br />
2.5 Sanctions<br />
One of the major shortcomings of the old Act that<br />
<br />
Competition Commission (ZCC) was the inadequacy<br />
of sanctions under that Act which did not<br />
deter would-be offenders. The new Act has recti-<br />
<br />
of various sanctions, of both administrative and<br />
criminal nature. Administrative sanctions are imposed<br />
by the Commission, while criminal sanctions<br />
can only be imposed by law courts.<br />
The most deterrent administrative sanction is the<br />
fending<br />
enterprise’s annual turnover. This sanction<br />
is imposed for a number of offences, including<br />
the following: (i) entering into or giving effect to<br />
per se prohibited agreements (in breach of sections<br />
9(1) and 10(1) of the Act); (ii) abusing a position<br />
of dominance (in breach of section 16(1) of<br />
the Act); (iii) not complying with a condition of an<br />
exemption (section 21(3)); (iii) offences relating to<br />
mergers (i.e.,: implementing a reviewable merger<br />
without the approval of the Commission, implementing<br />
a merger that has been rejected by the<br />
Commission, or (iv) failing to comply with merger<br />
approval conditions) (section 37); and (v) certain<br />
offences relating to consumer protection (e.g., engaging<br />
in unfair trading practices, false or misleading<br />
representations, display of disclaimers, supply<br />
of defective and unsuitable goods and services,