02.06.2013 Views

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Acknowledgments This research has<br />

been supported bv the grant of GACIZ No.<br />

106/00/1464 and the grant of MSMT<br />

No.240000012.<br />

OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL<br />

FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY:<br />

DOES THE ANTERIOR VERTEBRAL<br />

BODY LOSE STRENGTH FOLLOWING<br />

STRESS SHIELDING BY THE NEURAL<br />

ARCH<br />

P. Pollintine, S. J. Garbutt, J. H.Tobias1, D. S. MeNally2,<br />

G. K. Wakely, P. Dolan, M. A. Adams<br />

Department of Anatomy, and 1Rheumatology Unit,<br />

University of Bristol, U.K. 2University of Nottingham,<br />

U.K.<br />

Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral<br />

fractures are normally attributed to systemic<br />

bone loss caused by age-related hormonal<br />

changes and reduced physical activity.<br />

However, regional vertebral bone mass<br />

and density will also depend on the manner<br />

in which the intervertebral disc presses on<br />

the vertebral body, and on load-bearing by<br />

the neural arch. We hypothesise that agerelated<br />

degeneration of intervertebral discs<br />

increases neural arch compressive loadbearing,<br />

and influences the distribution of<br />

compressive load on the vertebral body,<br />

causing anterior vertebral body bone loss<br />

and weakening in the elderly spine.<br />

Materials and methods: Fifteen<br />

cadaveric motion segments (aged 72–92<br />

yrs),comprising 2 adjacent vertebral bodies<br />

and the intervening disc and ligaments,<br />

were compressed to 1.5kN while positioned<br />

to simulate erect standing posture<br />

and a simulated forward stooped posture.<br />

The distribution of intradiscal stress, measured<br />

by pulling a miniature pressure transducer<br />

along the mid-sagittal diameter of the<br />

disc, was integrated over area to give the<br />

force acting on the anterior and posterior<br />

halves of the vertebral body (1).These were<br />

subtracted from the 1.5 kN to determine<br />

the force on the neural arch. Compressive<br />

strength of each motion segment was measured<br />

in the stooped posture. Bone mineral<br />

density (BMD) of the anterior and whole<br />

vertebral body was measured by dual energy<br />

x-ray absorptiometry.<br />

Results: In erect posture, the neural<br />

arch resisted 48 % (STD 26˚10) of the<br />

applied 1,5 kN, while the anterior vertebral<br />

body resisted only 15 % (STD 19 %). However,<br />

in the stooped posture these values<br />

changed to 14 % (STD 7 %) and 57 % (STD<br />

22 %) respectively. Compressive strength in<br />

flexion correlated negatively with neural<br />

arch load-bearing in erect posture (r2=0.51,<br />

p=0.006). Compressive strength correlated<br />

with whole vertebral body BMD (r2 = 0.55,<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!